Advertisement

Leipzig-Halle: Ecosystem Services in a Stagnating Urban Region in Eastern Germany

  • Annette Bauer
  • Dietmar Röhl
  • Dagmar Haase
  • Nina Schwarz
Chapter

Abstract

Land use change makes an impact on ecosystem services and quality of life in urban regions. The dynamics of land use change as well as their effects are more clearly understood by taking local conditions into account. In the case of Leipzig-Halle, a period of heavy commercial and residential suburbanisation has recently come to an end. With uneven economic and population development, the region is characterised by stagnation and internal disparities. A clear-cut future development path is not self-evident. This raises questions for regional decision makers, planners and scientists alike: What are the potential land use developments of the future? Which of them are desirable and which are not? What, therefore, are appropriate and effective steering options? These questions are examined in this chapter.

Keywords

Ecosystem Service Spatial Planning Urban Green Space Green Corridor Brownfield Redevelopment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bauer A (2010) Assessment report on local and regional strategies. Internal report. http://www.plurel.net. Accessed 07 July 2010
  2. Baugesetzbuch (BauGB, 2005) 37. Edition, Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  3. Bolund P, Hunhammar S (1999) Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecol Econ 29:293–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bundesnaturschutzgesetz (BnatschG 2009) http://www.bundesrecht.juris.de. Accessed 23 Aug 2010
  5. City of Halle (2010) http://www.halle.de. Accessed 15 Nov 2010
  6. City of Leipzig (2007) Bevölkerungsvorausschätzung für die Stadt Leipzig 2005. Municipality of Leipzig, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  7. Eggers O, Schüttlohr K (2005) Öffentliches Baurecht. Bayerische Verwaltungsfachschule, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  8. EEA (European Environmental Agency) (2006a) Urban sprawl in Europe – the ignored challenge. EEA Report Oct 2006, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  9. EEA (European Environment Agency) (2006b) Corine land cover data download. http://www.eea.europa.eu/themes/landuse/interactive/clc-download. Accessed 21 July 2010
  10. Green Ring (2010) http://www.gruener-ring-leipzig.de. Accessed 21 July 2010
  11. Haase D, Nuissl H (2007) Does urban sprawl drive changes in the water balance and policy? The case of Leipzig (Germany) 1870–2003. Landscape Urban Plann 80:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haase D, Nuissl H (2010) Assessing the impacts of land use change on transforming regions. Editorial. Land Use Sci 5(2):67–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Haase D, Seppelt R, Haase A (2007) Land use impacts of demographic change—lessons from eastern German urban regions. In: Petrosillo I, Müller F, Jones KB, Zurlini G, Krauze K, Victorov S, Li B-L, Kepner WG (eds) Use of landscape sciences for the assessment of environmental security. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 329–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haase D, Bauer A, Reuther I, Schiffers B, Schwarz N, Seppelt R, Weinert J (2009) PLUREL regional workshop, Spatial development in the Leipzig-Halle region. Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  15. Regional Planning Association Halle (RPA Halle) (2009) Regional plan. http://www.regionale-planung.de/halle/html/frames/rplan.html. Accessed 19 Nov 2009
  16. Herfert G (2007) Regionale Polarisierung der demographischen Entwicklung in Ostdeutschland: Gleichwertigkeit der Lebensverhältnisse? Raumforschung und Raumordnung 65:435–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Institut für Länderkunde (IfL) (ed) (2001) Exkursionsführer Mitteldeutschland. Westermann, BraunschweigGoogle Scholar
  18. Kasanko M, Barredo JI, Lavalle C, McCormick N, Demicheli L, Sagris V, Brezger A (2006) Are European cities becoming dispersed? Landscape Urban Plann 77(1–2):111–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Loibl W, Köstl M (2008) Report on a methodology to delineate RUR-sub regions. Internal report. http://www.plurel.net. Accessed 21 July 2010
  20. Lorance Rall ED, Haase D (2011) Creative intervention in a dynamic city: a sustainability assessment of an interim use strategy for Brownfields in Leipzig, Germany. Landscape Urban Plann 100:189–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. MEA—Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2003) Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  22. Nuissl H, Rink D (2005) The ‘production’ of urban sprawl in eastern Germany as a phenomenon of post-socialist transformation. Cities 22(2):123–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Parthe Floodplain Cooperation (2009) http://www.zv-parthenaue.de. Accessed 7 Dec 2009
  24. Petrov L, Haase D, Lavalle C (2009) MOLAND Model results for the Leipzig region. PLUREL Newsl 5:5Google Scholar
  25. Pütz T (2010) Pendlerverflechtungen im Großraum Leipzig. http://www.bbr.bund.de. Accessed 3 Nov 2010
  26. Raumordnungsgesetz (ROG, 2005) 37. Edition, Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  27. Saxon Ministry of the Interior (SMI, 2004) Raumordnung und Landesentwicklung in Sachsen. http://www.landesentwicklung.sachsen.de/index.html. Accessed 24 Oct 2009
  28. Saxon Office for Statistics (2010a) Population statistics. http://www.statistik.sachsen.de. Accessed 20 July 2010
  29. Saxon Office for Statistics (2010b) Territory, administrative structure. http://www.statistik.sachsen.de. Accessed July 2010
  30. Saxon Office for Statistics (2010c) Employment and labour market. http://www.statistik.sachsen.de. Accessed 20 June 2010
  31. Saxony-Anhalt Office for Statistics (2010a) Population statistics. http://www.statistik.sachsen-anhalt.de. Accessed 20 July 2010
  32. Saxony-Anhalt Office for Statistics (2010b) Territory, administrative structure. http://www.statistik.sachsen-anhalt.de. Accessed July 2010
  33. Schwarz N, Bauer A, Haase D (2010) Assessing climate impacts of planning policies—an estimation for the urban region of Leipzig (Germany). Environ Impact Assess. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2010.02.002
  34. Sinn A, Haase D, Walde A (2008) Analysis of regional spatial planning and decision-making strategies and their impact on land use in the urban fringe. Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research—UFZ, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  35. Sinning H (2002) Leistungsfähigkeit und Grenzen kommunikativer Planungsinstrumente – am Beispiel nachhaltiger Freiraumentwicklung in Stadtregionen. Dissertation, RWTH AachenGoogle Scholar
  36. Tosics I, Szemö H, Illés D, Gertheis A, Lalenis K, Kalergis D (2010) National spatial planning policies and governance typology. Internal report. http://www.plurel.net. Accessed 21 July 2010
  37. Turowski G (2002) Spatial planning in Germany: structures and concepts. Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung, HannoverGoogle Scholar
  38. Regional Planning Association Western Saxony (RPA Western Saxony, 2008) Regional plan. http://www.rpv-westsachsen.de. Accessed 4 Sep 2009

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Annette Bauer
    • 1
    • 2
  • Dietmar Röhl
    • 3
  • Dagmar Haase
    • 1
    • 4
  • Nina Schwarz
    • 1
  1. 1.Department Comptational Landscape EcologyHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research GmbH - UFZLeipzigGermany
  2. 2.Sachgebiet Raumordnung, Landes- und RegionalplanungRegierung von MittelfrankenAnsbachGermany
  3. 3.Landesdirektion SachsenReferat 34 / Raumordnung, StadtentwicklungLeipzigGermany
  4. 4.Humboldt University Berlin/Institute of GeographyBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations