The Dynamics of Peri-Urbanization

  • Joe Ravetz
  • Christian Fertner
  • Thomas Sick Nielsen
Chapter

Abstract

The peri-urban (sometimes also called the urban fringe) may be the dominant urban form and spatial planning challenge of the twenty-first century. In older industrial or post-industrial countries the peri-urban is a zone of social and economic change and spatial restructuring, while in newer industrializing countries, and most of the developing world, the peri-urban is often a zone of chaotic urbanization leading to sprawl. In both cases the peri-urban can be seen as not just a fringe in-between city and countryside, a zone of transition, rather it is a new kind of multi-functional territory. While it resists simple definitions, there are common features wherever such areas are found, such as a relatively low population density by urban standards, scattered settlements, high dependence on transport for commuting, fragmented communities and lack of spatial governance. Many global challenges arise from the ways that cities grow and change, especially the emerging mega-cities in developing countries where massive social and environmental problems can be found in their peri-urban hinterlands.

Keywords

Urban Expansion Urban Sprawl Urban System Urban Core Urban Fringe 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Adell G (1999) Theories and models of the peri-urban interface. A changing conceptual land-scape, strategic environmental planning and management for the peri-urban interface – research project. Development Planning Unit, University College, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen P, Engelen G, Sanglier M (1986) Towards a general dynamic model of the spatial evolution of urban systems. In: Hutchinson B, Batty M (eds) Advances in urban systems modelling. North-Holland/Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  3. Angel S, Sheppard SC, Civco DL (2005) The dynamics of global urban expansion. World Bank, Transport, Urban Development Department, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  4. Batty M, Longley PA (1994) Fractal Cities: A Geometry of Form and Function. Academic Press, San Diego, CalifGoogle Scholar
  5. Barredo JI, Kasanko M, Lavalle C, McCormick N, Demicheli L (2003) Sustainable urban and regional planning. The MOLAND activities on urban scenario modelling and forecast, European Commission-Joint Research Centre. http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu. Accessed 14 Mar 2012
  6. Beck U (1995) Ecological politics in an age of risk. Polity Press, BristolGoogle Scholar
  7. Bell S, Alves S, Silveirinha de OE, Zuin A (2010) Migration and land use change in Europe. A review. Living Rev Landscape Res 4(2). Online article. http://www.livingreviews.org/lrlr-2010-2. Accessed 14 Mar 2012
  8. Bengs C, Schmidt-Thomé K (2006) ESPON 1.1.2. Urban–rural relations in Europe. Final report. ESPON, Luxembourg. Online access. www.espon.eu. Accessed 14 Mar 2012
  9. Bertrand N (2007) Introduction: ESDP ideals and the inheritance of rural planning failures. In: Bertrand N, Kreibich V (eds) Europe’s city-regions competitiveness: growth regulation and peri-urban land management. Van Gorcum, Assen, pp 1–35Google Scholar
  10. Borsdorf A, Salet W (2007) Spatial reconfiguration and problems of governance in urban regions of Europe. An introduction to the Belgeo issue on advanced service sectors in European urban regions. Belgeo 1:1–12Google Scholar
  11. Briquel V, Collicard J-J (2005) Diversity in the rural hinterlands of European cities. In: Hoggart K (ed) The city’s hinterland – dynamism and divergence in Europe’s peri-urban territories. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 19–40Google Scholar
  12. Bruegmann R (2008) Sprawl: a compact history. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  13. Brunet R (1989) Les villes europeénnes: Rapport pour la DATAR, Délégation à l‘Aménagement du Territoire et à l‘Action Régionale, ParisGoogle Scholar
  14. Bryant CR, Russwurm LH, McLellan AG (1982) The city’s countryside: land and its management in the rural–urban fringe. Longman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Caruso G (2001) Peri-urbanisation. the situation in Europe. A bibliographical note and survey of studies in the Netherlands, Belgium, Great Britain, Germany, Italy and the Nordic countries. Report prepared for DATAR, FranceGoogle Scholar
  16. CEC (2008) Green paper on territorial cohesion. Turning territorial diversity into strength. SEC(2008) 2550, Commission of the European Communities, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  17. CEMAT (2007) Spatial development glossary. Council of Europe, StrasbourgGoogle Scholar
  18. Champion A (1999) Urbanization and counter-urbanization. In: Pacione M (ed) Applied geography. Principle and practice. Routledge, London, pp 347–357Google Scholar
  19. Champion AG, Fielding AJ, Keeble D (1989) Counterurbanization in Europe. Geogr J 155(1):52–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Clay G (1994) Real places: an unconventional guide to America’s generic landscape. University of Chicago Press, IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  21. CURE (Centre for Urban and Regional Ecology) (2003) Sustainable development in the countryside around towns. Report TX 171. Countryside Agency, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  22. Daniels T (1998) When city and country collide: managing growth in the metropolitan fringe. Island Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Davis M (2005) Planet of slums. Verso, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. De Roo G, Silva EA (2010) A planners encounter with complexity. Ashgate, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  25. Doxiades C (1968) Ekistics. An introduction to the science of human settlements. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Duhr S, Colomb C, Nadin V (2009) European spatial planning and territorial cooperation. Routledge, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  27. EEA (2000) CORINE land cover technical guide – Addendum 2000. Technical report no. 40, European Environment Agency, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  28. EEA (2006) Urban sprawl in Europe: the ignored challenge. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, 10/2006Google Scholar
  29. ESDP (1999) European spatial development perspective: towards balanced and sustainable development of the territory of the European Union, Informal Council of Ministers responsible for spatial planning. European Commission, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  30. Farley P, Roberts MS (2011) Edgelands. Journeys into England’s true wilderness. Jonathan Cape, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Friedmann J, Miller J (1965) The urban field. J Am Inst Planners 31(4):312–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gallent N, Andersson J, Bianconi M (2006) Planning on the edge: the context for planning at the rural–urban fringe. Routledge, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  33. Galster G, Hanson R, Ratcliffe M, Wolman H, Coleman S, Freihage J (2001) Wrestling sprawl to the ground. Defining and measuring an elusive concept. Hous Policy Debate 12(4):681–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Garreau J (1991) Edge city: life on the new frontier. Doubleday, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Geels FW (2005) Technological transitions and system innovation: a coevolutionary and socio-technical analysis. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UKGoogle Scholar
  36. Giannini E (1994) Metroscape. Dissertation, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  37. Ginsburg NS, Koppel B (2004) The extended metropolis: settlement transition in Asia. University of Hawaii Press, HonoluluGoogle Scholar
  38. Gottmann J (1961) Megalopolis: the urbanized northeastern seaboard of the United States. Sage Publications, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Graham S, Marvin S (2001) Splintering urbanism: networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hall P, Pain K (2006) The polycentric metropolis: learning from mega-city regions in Europe. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  41. Hardoy J, Mitlin D, Satterthwaite D (2001) Environmental problems in an urbanizing world. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  42. Harvey D (1985) The urbanization of capital. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  43. Harvey D (1987) The urban process under capitalism. Int J Urban Reg Res 2(1):101–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. IPCC Working Group III (2000) IPCC special report on emissions scenarios, SRES. UN Environment Programme, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. Jansson T, Bakker M, Hasler B, Helming J, Kaae B, Lemouël P, Neye S, Ortiz R, Nielsen TS, Verhoog D, Verkerk H (2009) The SIAT model chain. SENSOR report series 2009/2. Leibniz-Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Müncheberg. http://tran.zalf.de/home_ip-sensor. Accessed 14 Mar 2012
  46. Jones GW, Douglass M (2008) Mega-urban regions in Pacific Asia: urban dynamics in a global era. NUS Press, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  47. Knox PL, Taylor PJ (1995) World cities in a world-system. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Korcelli P, Kozubek E, Piorr A (2011) Economy and employment. In: Piorr A, Ravetz J, Tosics I (eds) Rural–urban regions and peri-urbanisation in Europe. Academic Books Life Sciences, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  49. Kraffczyk D (2004) The MetroScape: a geography of the contemporary city. Harvard University, Graduate School of Design, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  50. Lacqiuan A (2005) Beyond metropolis: the planning and governance of Asia’s mega-urban regions. Woodrow Wilson Center Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  51. Leontidou L, Couch C (2007) Urban sprawl and hybrid city-scapes in Europe: comparisons, theory construction and conclusions. In: Couch C, Leontidou L, Petschel-Held G (eds) Urban sprawl in Europe: landscapes, land-use change and policy. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  52. Loibl W, Bell S (2011) Population and migration. In: Piorr A, Ravetz J, Tosics I (eds) Peri-urbanisation in Europe. Academic Books Life Sciences, Copenhagen, pp 50–55Google Scholar
  53. Loibl W, Toetzer T (2003) Modelling growth and densification processes in sub-urban regions – simulation of landscape transition with spatial agents. Environ Modell Softw 18(2003):553–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Maciocco G (2008) The territorial future of the city [electronic resource]. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. McGregor D, Simon D, Thompson D (2006) The peri-urban interface: approaches to sustainable natural and human resource use. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  56. Mumford L (1938) The culture of cities. Secker and Warburg, LondonGoogle Scholar
  57. Nelson AC, Sanchez TW (1999) Debunking the exurban myth. A comparison of suburban households. Hous Policy Debate 10(3):689–709Google Scholar
  58. Nordregio (2005) ESPON 1.1.1. Potentials for polycentric development in Europe. Final report. ESPON, Luxembourg. www.espon.eu. Accessed 14 Mar 2012
  59. Portugali J (2000) Self-Organization and the City. Springer-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  60. Ravetz J (2000) City-region 2020: integrated planning for a sustainable environment. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  61. Ravetz J (2011a) Integrated development for peri-urban territorial cohesion. In: Piorr A, Ravetz J, Tosics I (eds) Peri-urbanisation in Europe. Academic Books Life Sciences, Copenhagen, pp 114–123Google Scholar
  62. Ravetz J (2011b) Peri-urban ecology: green infrastructure in the 21st century metro-scape. In: Douglas I (ed) Handbook of urban ecology. Routledge, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  63. Reckien D, Karecha J (2007) Sprawl in European cities. The comparative background. In: Couch C, Leontidou L, Petschel-Held G (eds) Urban sprawl in Europe: landscapes, landuse change and policy. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  64. Rickebusch S, Rounsevell M (2009) Where will Europeans live in the future? PLUREL newsletter no. 6, pp 1–3. www.plurel.net. Accessed 14 Mar 2012
  65. Ristimäki M (2011) Mobility and transport. In: Piorr A, Ravetz J, Tosics I (eds) Peri-urbanisation in Europe. Academic Books Life Sciences, Copenhagen, pp 61–64Google Scholar
  66. Robinson GM (1990) Conflict and change in the countryside: rural society, economy and planning in the developed world. Belhaven Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  67. Samir KC, Skirbekk V, Mishra T (2008) Demographic projections for NUTS2 regions in EU countries based on national probabilistic population projection. PLUREL deliverable report 1.2.3. www.plurel.net. Accessed 14 Mar 2012
  68. Schneider A, Woodcock C (2008) Compact, dispersed, fragmented, extensive? A comparison of urban expansion in twenty-five global cities using remotely sensed, data pattern metrics and census information. Urban Stud 45:659–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Scott AJ (2000) The cultural economy of cities: essays on the geography of image-producing industries. Sage, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  70. Shoard M (1983) This land is our land. Paladin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  71. Soja E (2000) Postmetropolis: critical studies of cities and regions. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  72. Spectorsky AC (1955) The exurbanites. Lippincott, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  73. Waltner-Toews D, Kay JJ, Lister N-M (eds) (2009) The ecosystem approach: complexity, uncertainty, and managing for sustainability. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  74. Zasada I, Berges R (2011) Environment and landscape. In: Piorr A, Ravetz J, Tosics I (eds) Peri-urbanisation in Europe. Academic Books Life Sciences, Copenhagen, pp 72–75Google Scholar
  75. Zasada I, Alves S, Müller FC, Piorr A, Berges R, Bell S (2010) International retirement migration in the Alicante region, Spain: process, spatial pattern and environmental impacts. J Environ Plann Manag 53(1):125–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joe Ravetz
    • 1
  • Christian Fertner
    • 2
  • Thomas Sick Nielsen
    • 3
  1. 1.Centre for Urban & Regional EcologyUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK
  2. 2.Department of Geosciences, Natural Resources and PlanningUniversity of CopenhagenFrederiksberg CDenmark
  3. 3.Department of TransportTechnical University of DenmarkLyngbyDenmark

Personalised recommendations