Implications of mHealth Service Deployments: A Comparison between Dissimilar European Countries

  • Frederic Vannieuwenborg
  • Zviad Kirtava
  • Lambros Lambrinos
  • Jan Van Ooteghem
  • Sofie Verbrugge
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7216)


Despite several successful pilot studies, a general implementation and adoption of mobile health services is not often the case. The deployment of eHealth and in particular mHealth services is discussed for three non similar European countries: Cyprus, Georgia, and Belgium. Each country uses the same kind of mobile health services with a different emphasis. By comparing results of a reference case, tele-monitoring heart patients, major implications are identified for a general rollout of services and respective recommendations.


mHealth Tele-monitoring Business model implications 


  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Dang, S., Dimmick, S., Kelkar, G.: Evaluating the Evidence Base for the Use of Home Telehealth Remote Monitoring in Elderly with Heart Failure. Telemedicine and e-Health 15, 783–796 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dansky, K.H., Palmer, L., Shea, D., Bowles, K.H.: Cost Analysis of Telehomecare. Telemedicine Journal and e-Health 7, 225–232 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    K. M. O. FOD Economie, Middenstand en Energie, Causes of Death, statistics for 2006,
  6. 6.
    Fransen, E.: The Vitaphone Tele-ECG System: Event Recording in Patients With Arrhytmias (2009),
  7. 7.
    I. Global Industry Analysts, Global Telemedicine Market to Exceed $18 Billion by 2015 (2009) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hebert, K., Quevedo, H.C., Gogichiashvili, I., Nozadze, N., Sagirashvili, E., Trahan, P., Kipshidze, N., Arcement, L.: Feasibility of a Heart Failure Disease Management Program in Eastern Europe: Tbilisi, Georgia. In: Circulation: Heart Failure, September 7 (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kirtava, Z., Aladashvili, A., Chapidze, G.: Still Image Teleconsulting for Interventional Cardiology in Georgia. Presented at the Abstracts of the 6th Int. Conference on Telemedicine, vol. 9, pp. 342–343 (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kirtava, Z.: e-Health and m-Health: Trends and visions for resource-limited environment in developing economies - case of Georgia. Presented at the ESF and COST High-Level Conference “Future Internet and Society – Complex Systems Perspective”, Acquafredda di Maratea, Italy (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kyriacou, E., Pavlopoulos, S., Berler, A., Neophytou, M., Bourka, A., Georgoulas, A., Anagnostaki, A., Karayiannis, D., Schizas, C., Pattichis, C., Andreou, A., Koutsouris, D.: Multi-purpose HealthCare Telemedicine Systems with mobile communication link support. BioMedical Engineering OnLine 2 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kyriacou, E., Pattichis, C., Hoplaros, D., Kounoudes, A., Milis, M., Jossif, A.: A System for Monitoring Children with Suspected Cardiac Arrhythmias - Technical Optimizations and Evaluation. In: Bamidis, P.D., Pallikarakis, N. (eds.) XII Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, vol. 29, pp. 924–927. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lambrinos, L., Djouvas, C.: Using location information for sophisticated emergency call management. In: Lin, J.C., Nikita, K.S. (eds.) MobiHealth 2010. LNICST, vol. 55, pp. 227–232. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee, I.: in, ed: HCII, Carnegie Mellon University (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mikalajunaite, E.: 500m people will be using healthcare mobile applications in 2015, October 19 (November 2010),
  16. 16.
    Mougiakakou, S., Kyriacou, E., Perakis, K., Papadopoulos, H., Androulidakis, A., Konnis, G., Tranfaglia, R., Pecchia, L., Bracale, U., Pattichis, C., Koutsouris, D.: A feasibility study for the provision of electronic healthcare tools and services in areas of Greece, Cyprus and Italy. BioMedical Engineering OnLine 10, 49 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
    RIZIV, Telemonitoring voor chronische patiënten : financiering van 6 projecten, October 18 (2011),
  19. 19.
    Scholl, J., Lambrinos, L., Lindgren, A.: Rural Telemedicine Networks using Store-andforward VoIP and DTN. Presented at the Medical Informatics Europe (MIE 2009), Sarajevo, Serbia (2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Seto, E.: Cost Comparison Between Telemonitoring and Usual Care of Heart Failure: A Systematic Review. Telemedicine and e-Health 14, 679–686 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Valeri, L., Giesen, D., Jansen, P., Klokgieters, K.: Business Models for eHealth. Presented at the ICT for Health Unit, DG Information Society and Media (2010)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Van Ooteghem, J., Ackaert, A., Verbrugge, S., Colle, D., Pickavet, M., Demeester, P.: Economic viability of eCare solutions. In: eHealth 2010: Proceedings of the Third International ICST Conference on Electronic Healthcare for the 21st Century (2010)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Whited, J.D.: Economic Analysis of Telemedicine and the Teledermatology Paradigm. Telemedicine and e-Health 16, 223–228 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Winblad, I., Hämäläinen, P., Reponen, J.: What Is Found Positive in Healthcare Information and Communication Technology Implementation?- The Results of a Nationwide Survey in Finland. Telemedicine and e-Health 17, 118–123 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    World Health Organization, World Health Report 2002: Reducing risks, promoting healthy life. WHO Press, Geneva, Switzerland (2002) Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    World Health Organization, Surveillance of chronic disease: risk factors: countrylevel data and comparable estimates (SuRF reports; 2). WHO Press, Geneva, Switzerland (2005) Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    World Health Organization: Global Observatory for eHealth series 1 (2010),
  28. 28.
    World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Assessment of NCD prevention and control in Primary Health Care, Georgia (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2012

Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 International License (, which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frederic Vannieuwenborg
    • 1
  • Zviad Kirtava
    • 2
  • Lambros Lambrinos
    • 3
  • Jan Van Ooteghem
    • 1
  • Sofie Verbrugge
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Information Technology (INTEC)Ghent University, IBBTBelgium
  2. 2.Partners for Health NGONational Information Learning CentreGeorgia
  3. 3.Dept. of Communication and Internet StudiesCyprus University of TechnologyCyprus

Personalised recommendations