Advertisement

A Three-Level Cognitive Architecture for the Simulation of Human Behaviour

  • Othalia Larue
  • Pierre Poirier
  • Roger Nkambou
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7310)

Abstract

We present a three level Cognitive architecture for the simulation of human behaviour based on Stanovich’s tripartite framework (2010), which provides an explanation of how reflective and adaptive human behaviour emerges from the interaction of three distinct cognitive levels. The architecture is a symbolic dynamical system implemented in a multiagent system. We describe our methodology and a first validation: a classical and semantic Stroop task simulation.

Keywords

Multiagent System Stroop Task Semantic Memory Incongruent Trial Cognitive Level 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Sun, R.: Desiderata for cognitive architectures. Philosophical Psychology 17(3), 341–373 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eliasmith, C.: Moving beyond metaphors: Understanding the mind for what it is. Journal of Philosophy C(10), 493–520 (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stanovich, K.E.: Rationality and the reactive mind. Oxford Univ. Press (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Newell, A.: Unified theories of cognition. Harvard Univ. Press, MA (1990)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stroop, J.R.: Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Can. J. Psych. 36, 684–700 (1935)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ionescu, S., Blanchet, A.: Psychologie cognitive et bases neurophysiologiques du fonctionnement cognitif. PUF, Paris (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Engle, R.W.: Role of Working Memory capacity in Cognitive Control. Current Anthropology 51 (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Roelofs, A.: Goal-referenced selection of verbal action. Psychological Review 110, 88–125 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dehaene, S., Kerzsberg, M., Changeux, J.P.: A neuronal Model of a global workspace in effortful cognitive tasks. Neurobiology 95, 14529–14534 (1998)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lovett, M.: Modeling selective attention: NJAMOS. Cognitive Systems Research (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Anderson, J.R.: The architecture of cognition. Harvard University Press, MA (1983)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cardon, A.: La complexite organise: systmes adaptatifs et champ organisationnel. Hermes Science Publications, Paris (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ferber, J., Gutknecht, O., Michel, F.: From Agents to Organizations: An Organizational View of Multi-agent Systems. In: Giorgini, P., Müller, J.P., Odell, J.J. (eds.) AOSE 2003. LNCS, vol. 2935, pp. 214–230. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Frankish, K., Evans, J.S.B.T.: The duality of mind: a historical per- spective. In: Frankish, K., Evans, J.S. (eds.) Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Othalia Larue
    • 1
  • Pierre Poirier
    • 1
  • Roger Nkambou
    • 1
  1. 1.GDAC Resarch LaboratoryUniversité du Québec à MontréalMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations