Skip to main content

Exploiting the Probability of Observation for Efficient Bayesian Network Inference

  • Conference paper
  • 1796 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7310))

Abstract

It is well-known that the observation of a variable in a Bay-esian network can affect the effective connectivity of the network, which in turn affects the efficiency of inference. Unfortunately, the observed variables may not be known until runtime, which limits the amount of compile-time optimization that can be done in this regard. In this paper, we consider how to improve inference when we know the likelihood of a variable being observed. We show how these probabilities of observation can be exploited to improve existing heuristics for choosing elimination orderings for inference. Empirical tests over a set of benchmark networks using the Variable Elimination algorithm show reductions of up to 50%, 70%, and 55% in multiplications, summations, and runtime, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Becker, A., Geiger, D.: A Sufficiently Fast Algorithm for Finding Close to Optimal Clique Trees. Artificial Intelligence 125, 3–17 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Cooper, G.F.: The Computational Complexity of Probabilistic Inference using Bayesian Belief Networks. Artificial Intelligence 42, 393–405 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Darwiche, A.: Recursive Conditioning - Any-space Conditioning Method with Treewidth-Bounded Complexity. Artificial Intelligence 126(1-2), 5–41 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Dow, P.A., Korf, R.E.: Best-First Search for Treewidth. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on Aritificial Intelligence. AAAI press, CA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fishelson, M., Geiger, D.: Optimizing Exact Genetic Linkage Computations. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Research in Computational Molecular Biology (RECOMB), pp. 114–121 (April 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gogate, V., Dechter, R.: A Complete Anytime Algorithm for Treewidth. In: Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference on Uncertainity in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 201–208. AUAI press, Arlinton (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kjaerulff, U.: Triangulation of Graphs—Algorithms Giving Small Total State Space. Tech. Rep. R90-09, Department of Computer Science, University of Aalborg, Denmark (March 1990)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kjaerulff, U.B., Madsen, A.L.: Bayesian Networks and Influence Diagrams: A Guide to Construction and Analysis. Springer Publishing Company (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Koller, D., Friedman, N.: Probabilistic Graphical Models - Principles and Techniques. MIT Press (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Langevin, S., Valtorta, M.: Performance Evaluation of Algorithms for Soft Evidential Update in Bayesian Networks: First Results. In: Greco, S., Lukasiewicz, T. (eds.) SUM 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5291, pp. 284–297. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Lauritzen, S., Spiegelhalter, D.: Local Computations with Probabilities on Graphical Structures and Their Application to Expert Systems. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 50, 157–224 (1988)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Pan, R., Peng, Y., Ding, Z.: Belief Update in Bayesian Networks Using Uncertain Evidence. In: 18th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, pp. 441–444 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shoikhet, K., Geiger, D.: A Practical Algorithm for Finding Optimal Triangulations. In: Proceedings of the AAAI/IAAI, pp. 185–190 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang, N., Poole, D.: A Simple Approach to Bayesian Network Computations. In: The 10th Canadian Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 171–178 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mousumi, F., Grant, K. (2012). Exploiting the Probability of Observation for Efficient Bayesian Network Inference. In: Kosseim, L., Inkpen, D. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Canadian AI 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7310. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30353-1_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30353-1_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30352-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30353-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics