Advertisement

Numerical Procedure

  • Rudolf Kippenhahn
  • Alfred Weigert
  • Achim Weiss
Chapter
Part of the Astronomy and Astrophysics Library book series (AAL)

Abstract

For realistic material functions no analytic solutions are possible, so that one depends all the more on numerical solutions of the basic differential equations. Consequently the activity and the number of results in this field has increased with the numerical capabilities. The growth of computing facilities by leaps and bounds since the 1960s may be illustrated by a remark of M. Schwarzschild (1958): “A person can perform more than twenty integration steps per day”, so that “for a typical single integration consisting of, say, forty steps, less than two days are needed”. The situation has changed drastically since those days when the scientist’s need for meals and sleep was an essential factor in the total computing time for one model. Nowadays one asks rather for the number of solutions produced per second. And these modern solutions are enormously more refined (numerically and physically) than those produced 40 years ago. This progress has been possible because of the introduction of large and fast electronic computers and the simultaneous development of an adequate numerical procedure connected with the name of L.G. Henyey. His method for calculating models in hydrostatic equilibrium is now generally used and will be described later.

Keywords

Grid Point Mesh Point Stellar Wind Implicit Scheme Small Time Step 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Henyey, L.G., Forbes, J.E., Gould, N.L. (1964): Astrophys. J. 139, 306ADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Kähler, H. (1972): Astron. Astrophys. 20, 105ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. Kähler, H. (1975): Astron. Astrophys. 43, 443ADSGoogle Scholar
  4. Kähler, H. (1978): In The HR Diagram, ed. by A.G.D. Philip and D.S. Hayes, IAU Symp. 80 (Reidel, Dordtrecht), p. 303Google Scholar
  5. Kippenhahn, R., Weigert, A., Hofmeister, E. (1967): Meth. Comp. Phys. 7, 129Google Scholar
  6. Paczyński, B. (1972): Acta Astron. 22, 163ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. Richtmyer, R.D., Morton, K.W. (1967): Difference Methods for Initial-Value Problems, 2nd ed. (Interscience, New York)Google Scholar
  8. Schlattl, H. (1999): The Sun - a Laboratory for Neutrino- and Astrophysics, PhD thesis, TechnU̇niv. MunichGoogle Scholar
  9. Schwarzschild, M. (1958): Structure and Evolution of the Stars (Princeton University Press, Princeton)Google Scholar
  10. Wagenhuber, J., Weiss, A. (1994): Astron. Astrophys. 286, 121ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rudolf Kippenhahn
    • 1
  • Alfred Weigert
    • 2
  • Achim Weiss
    • 3
  1. 1.GöttingenGermany
  2. 2.Universität HamburgHamburgGermany
  3. 3.Max-Planck-Institut für AstrophysikGarchingGermany

Personalised recommendations