Advertisement

Structural Evolution in Knowledge Transfer Network: An Agent-Based Model

  • Haoxiang Xia
  • Yanyan Du
  • Zhaoguo Xuan
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 424)

Abstract

We use an agent-based model to study the effect of knowledge transfer on the structural evolution of a social network. In the proposed model, the agents exchange knowledge with their network neighbors; and simultaneously they adjust their neighbors by edge-rewiring in order seek better chance for knowledge transfer. This gives rise to the coevolution of the population’s knowledge state and the network topology. Through computational simulations, interesting phenomena are observed, most notably the disassembly and reassembly of the network connectivity and the emergence of the small-world structure that is self-organized from the initial random network. The underlying mechanisms are partly analyzed.

Keywords

Knowledge Transfer Structural Evolution Network Connectivity Random Network Local Group 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Argote, L., Ingram, P.: Knowledge transfer: a basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 82(1), 150–169 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Castellano, C., Fortunato, S., Loreto, V.: Statistical physics of social dynamics. Reviews of Modern Physics 81(2), 591–646 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Coleman, J., Katz, E., Menzel, H.: The diffusion of an innovation among physicians. Sociometry 20(4), 253–270 (1957)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cowan, R., Jonard, N.: Network structure and the diffusion of knowledge. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 28, 1557–1575 (2004)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fiske, S., Taylor, S.E.: Social cognition, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (1991)Google Scholar
  6. Gross, T., Blasius, B.: Adaptive coevolutionary networks: a review. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 5(20), 259–271 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kim, H., Park, Y.: Structural effects of R&D collaboration network on knowledge diffusion performance. Expert Systems with Applications 36(5), 8986–8992 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Palazzolo, E., Serb, D., She, Y., Su, C., Contractor, N.: Co-evolution of communication and knowledge networks as transactive memory systems. Communication Theory 16(2), 223–250 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Reagans, R., McEvily, B.: Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly 48, 240–267 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Rogers, E.M., Bhowmik, D.K.: Homophily-heterophily: relational concepts for communication research. Public Opinion Quarterly 34(4), 523–538 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Roth, C., Cointet, J.-P.: Social and semantic coevolution in knowledge networks. Social Networks 32(1), 16–29 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Scholl, W.: Effective teamwork: A theoretical model and a test in the field. In: Witte, J., Davis, J. (eds.) Understanding Group Behavior, vol. 2, pp. 127–146. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1996)Google Scholar
  13. Watts, D.J., Strogatz, S.H.: Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks. Nature 393(6684), 440–442 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Haoxiang Xia
    • 1
  • Yanyan Du
    • 1
  • Zhaoguo Xuan
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Systems EngineeringDalian University of TechnologyDalianChina

Personalised recommendations