Socio-dynamic Discrete Choice on Networks in Space: Impact of Initial Conditions, Network Size and Connectivity on Emergent Outcomes in a Simple Nested Logit Model

  • Elenna R. Dugundji
  • László Gulyás
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 424)


The reported research treats interactions between agents and generated feedback dynamics in the adoption of various transportation mode alternatives. We consider a simple nested logit model where an agent’s choice is directly influenced by the percentages of the agent’s neighbors and socio-economic peers making each choice, and which accounts for common unobserved attributes of the choice alternatives in the error structure. We explicitly address non-global interactions within several hypothesized social and spatial network structures. Discrete choice estimation results controlling heterogeneous individual preferences are embedded in a multi-agent based simulation model in order to observe the evolution of choice behavior over time with socio-dynamic feedback due to the network effects. For the particular simple model under study, we find the impact of initial conditions on the emergent long-run behavioral outcomes is dependent on network size and network connectivity. We conclude highlighting limitations of our present study and recommendations for future work.


Discrete Choice Public Transit Mode Share Saddle Node Nest Logit Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ben-Akiva, M.: Structure of Passenger Travel Demand Models. Ph.D. Dissertation. Dept of Civil Engineering. MIT, Cambridge, MA (1973)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brock, W., Durlauf, S.: Multinomial Choice with Social Interactions. In: Blume, L., Durlauf, S. (eds.) The Economy as an Evolving Complex System III. Oxford University Press, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dugundji, E.R., Gulyás, L.: Socio-Dynamic Discrete Choice on Networks: Impacts of Agent Heterogeneity on Emergent Equilibrium Outcomes. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 35(6), 1028–1054 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ben-Akiva, M., Lerman, S.R.: Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. MIT Press, Cambridge (1985)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dugundji, E.R.: Discrete Choice on Networks: Nested Logit. In: Graduate Workshop on Computational Economics. Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Arentze, T.A., Timmermans, H.J.P., Hofman, F.: Creating Synthetic Household Populations: Problems and Approach. Transportation Research Record 2014, 85–91 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Arentze, T.A., van den Berg, P., Timmermans, H.J.P.: Modeling Social Networks in Geographic space: Approach and Empirical Application. Environment and Planning A (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hackney, J., Kowald, M.: Exponential Random Graph Models of the Zurich Snowball Survey. Futurenet Workshop: Social Network Analysis in Transport, Manchester, UK (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universiteit van AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.AITIA International Inc.BudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations