Advertisement

Der Mensch als rationalisierendes Wesen: Kognitive Dissonanz und Selbstrechtfertigung

  • Peter Fischer
  • Kathrin Asal
  • Joachim I. Krueger
Part of the Springer-Lehrbuch book series (SLB)

Zusammenfassung

Bestimmt kennen Sie diese oder eine ähnliche Situation: Sie sitzen abends gemütlich mit Freunden beisammen, die Stimmung ist gut, die Stunde wird immer später und an Heimgehen ist nicht zu denken. Noch ein weiteres Getränk bestellen? Wenn da nur nicht das schlechte Gewissen wäre – das Wissen um die morgige Veranstaltung an der Uni, zu der Sie gehen wollten, da die nächste Klausur ansteht. Und darüber hinaus das Wissen um einen möglicherweise verkaterten nächsten Tag, an dem Sie eigentlich noch einiges zu lernen hätten. Wie Sie sich auch entscheiden werden, ein ungutes Gefühl wird vermutlich in jedem Fall bestehen bleiben.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Weiterführende Literatur

  1. Cooper, J. (2007). Cognitive dissonance: Fifty years of a classic theory. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Egan, L. C., Santos, L. R. & Bloom, P. (2007). The origins of cognitive dissonance: Evidence from children and monkeys. Psychological Science, 18, 978–983.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Harmon-Jones, E., Amodio, D. M. & Harmon-Jones, C. (2009). Action-based model of dissonance: A review, integration, and expansion of conceptions of cognitive conflict. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances of Experimental Social Psychology (vol. 41, pp. 119–166). Burlington: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  4. Hart, W., Albarracín, D., Eagly, A. H., Brechan, I., Lindberg, M. J. & Merrill, L. (2009). Feeling validated versus being correct: A meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 555–588.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Literatur

  1. Aronson, E. (1968). Dissonance theory: Progress and problems. In R. P. Abelson, E. Aronson, W. J. McGuire, T. M. Newcomb, M. J. Rosenberg & P. H. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook (pp. 5–27). Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  2. Aronson, E. (1999). Dissonance, hypocrisy, and the self-concept. In E. Harmon-Jones & J. Mills (Eds.), Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology (pp. 103–126). Washington: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D. & Akert, R. M. (2008). Sozialpsychologie (6. Aufl.). München: Pearson Studium.Google Scholar
  4. Beckmann, J. & Kuhl, J. (1984). Altering information to gain action control: Functional aspects of human information processing in decision making. Journal of Research in Personality, 18, 224–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brehm, J. W. (1956). Postdecision changes in the desirability of alternatives. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52, 384–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brock, T. C. & Balloun, J. L. (1967). Behavioral receptivity to dissonant information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 413–428.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brockner, J. & Rubin, J. (1985). Entrapment in escalating conflict: A social psychology analysis. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cooper, J. & Fazio, R. H. (1984). A new look at dissonance theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 17, pp. 229-266). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  9. Ditto, P. H. & Lopez, D. F. (1992). Motivated skepticism: Use of differential decision criteria for preferred and non-preferred conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 568–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elkin, R. A. & Leippe, M. R. (1986). Physiological arousal, dissonance, and attitude change: Evidence for a dissonance-arousal link and a »don’t remind me« effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 55–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elliot, A. J. & Devine, P. G. (1994). On the motivational nature of cognitive dissonance: Dissonance as psychological discomfort. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 382–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston: Row, Peterson.Google Scholar
  13. Festinger, L. (1964). Conflict, decision and dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Festinger, L. & Carlsmith, J. M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 203–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Festinger, L., Riecken, H. & Schachter, S. (1956). When prophecy fails. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fischer, P. & Greitemeyer, T. (2010). A new look at selective exposure effects: An integrative model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 384–389.Google Scholar
  17. Fischer, P., Jonas, E., Frey, D. & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2005). Selective exposure to information: The impact of information limits. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 469–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Frey, D. (1981a). Informationssuche und Informationsbewertung bei Entscheidungen. Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
  19. Frey, D. (1981b). Postdecisional preference for decision-relevant information as a function of the competence of its source and the degree of familiarity with this information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Frey, D. (1982). Different levels of cognitive dissonance, information seeking and information avoidance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1175–1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Frey, D. (1986). Recent research on selective exposure to information. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 19, pp. 41–80). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  22. Frey, D. & Gaska, A. (2009). Die Theorie der kognitiven Dissonanz. In D. Frey & M. Irle (Hrsg.), Theorien der Sozialpsychologie. Band I: Kognitive Theorien (3. Nachdruck der 2. überarb. Aufl. 1993; S. 275–324). Bern: Hans Huber.Google Scholar
  23. Frey, D. & Wicklund, R. (1978). A clarification of selective exposure: The impact of choice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 132–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Harmon-Jones, E. (2000). An update on dissonance theory, with a focus on the self. In A. Tesser, R. Felson & J. Suls (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on self and identity (pp. 119–144). Washington: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Holton, B. & Pyszczynski, T. (1989). Biased information search in the interpersonal domain. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 42–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hoshino-Browne, E., Zanna, A. S., Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., Kitayama, S. & Lackenbauer, S. (2005). On the cultural guises of cognitive dissonance: The case of easterners and westerners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 294–310.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink (2nd rev. ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  28. Johnston, L. (1996). Resisting change: Information-seeking and stereotype change. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 799–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jonas, E., Graupmann, V., Fischer, P., Greitemeyer, T. & Frey, D. (2003). Dissonanz als Wahlkampfhelfer – Konfirmatorische Informationssuche im Kontext der Parteispendenaffäre der CDU [Dissonance as a supporter at an election campaign – Selective exposure in the context of the party donation affair of the CDU]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 34, 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jonas, E., Schulz-Hardt, S., Frey, D. & Thelen, N. (2001). Confirmation bias in sequential information search after preliminary decisions: An expansion of dissonance theoretical research on selective exposure to information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 557–571.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kiesler, C. A. & Pallak, M. S. (1976). Arousal properties of dissonance manipulations. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 1014–1025.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kray, L. J. & Galinsky, A. D. (2003). The debiasing effect of counterfactual mindsets: Increasing the search for disconfirmatory information in group decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lundgren, S. R. & Prislin, R. (1998). Motivated cognitive processing and attitude change. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 715–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Matz, D. & Wood, W. (2005). Cognitive dissonance in groups: The consequences of disagreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 22–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McGregor, I., Zanna, M. P., Holmes, J. G. & Spencer, S. J. (2001). Compensatory conviction in the face of personal uncertainty: Going to extremes and being oneself. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 472–488.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Norton, M. I., Monin, B., Cooper, J. & Hogg, M. A. (2003). Vicarious dissonance: Attitude change from the inconsistency of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 47–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R. & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pinkley, R. L., Griffith, T. L. & Northcraft, G. B. (1995). »Fixed Pie« à la Mode: Information availability, information processing, and the negotiation of suboptimal agreements. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62, 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Report on the U.S. Intelligence Community’s Prewar Intelligence Assessments on Iraq. (July 9, 2004). Washington, D.C. United States select senate 2 on intelligence. Retrieved from http://www.intelligence.senate.gov/108301.pdfGoogle Scholar
  40. Schulz-Hardt, S. (1997). Realitätsflucht in Entscheidungsprozessen: Vom Groupthink zum Entscheidungsautismus. Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
  41. Schwarz, N., Frey, D. & Kumpf, M. (1980). Interactive effects of writing and reading a persuasive essay on attitude change and selective exposure. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Steele, C. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 21, pp. 261–302). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  43. Steele, C. M. & Liu, T. J. (1983). Dissonance processes as self-affirmation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stone, J., Aronson, E., Crain, A. L., Winslow, M. P. & Fried, C. B. (1994). Inducing hypocrisy as a means of encouraging young adults to use condoms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 116–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sweeney, P. D. & Gruber, K. L. (1984). Selective exposure: Voter information preferences and the Watergate affair. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1208–1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tesser, A. & Cornell, D. P. (1991). On the confluence of self processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 501–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Fischer
    • 1
  • Kathrin Asal
    • 1
  • Joachim I. Krueger
    • 2
  1. 1.Universität RegensburgRegensburg
  2. 2.Brown UniversityBrown

Personalised recommendations