Advertisement

Lateralised Social Learning in Chicks

  • Orsola Rosa Salva
  • Lucia Regolin
  • Giorgio Vallortigara
Chapter

Abstract

In social learning, one individual acquires information on objects encountered in the environment by observing the interaction of another individual with such objects. A highly adaptive form of social learning regards the biologically relevant features of food items. Functional lateralisation of the brain is a widespread phenomenon in the vertebrates, present both in social and non-social learning tasks (such as those involved in foraging activities). Here, we report on our recent studies on lateralisation in social learning following the observation of conspecifics’ behaviour. We employed the domestic chick as a model (since it is highly lateralized in many relevant tasks) and a social version of a passive avoidance learning (PAL) task in which one chick (the demonstrator) pecks at a bead whilst another chick (the observer) views the demonstrator’s response. The bead is either coated in a bitter-tasting substance or left dry. Later both chicks are presented with a similar, dry, bead to determine if learning has occurred. We demonstrated that chicks learn to avoid pecking by observation only of a conspecifics’ disgust reaction after pecking a bitter-tasting bead. This learning is lateralised: access to the right hemisphere is necessary for successful recall. This is in contrast to the non-social version of this task, in which the left hemisphere plays the dominant role, although both hemispheres are, in turn, subject to brief windows of “enhanced recall” during memory formation (as theorised by an influential model of memory formation, Andrew 1999). We also investigated whether such recall events are prevalent in the social learning task.

Keywords

Left Hemisphere Social Learning Memory Trace Memory Formation Memory Phase 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Abbreviations

MeA

Methyl anthranilate

PAL

Passive avoidance learning

IMM

Intermediate medial mesopallium

StM

Medial striatum

ITM

Intermediate term memory phase, ITM-A and ITM-B refer to the first and second part of the ITM

LTM

Long-term memory phase

LE-chicks

Chicks having the left eye in use

RE-chicks

Chicks having the right eye in use

References

  1. Ades C, Ramires EN (2002) Asymmetry of leg use during prey handling in the spider Scytodes globula (Scytodidae). J Insect Behav 15:563–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen T, Clarke JA (2005) Social learning of food preferences by white-tailed ptarmigan chicks. Anim Behav 70:305–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrew RJ (1991a) Cyclicity in memory formation. In: Andrew RJ (ed) Neural and behavioural plasticity. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrew RJ (1991b) The nature of behavioural lateralization in the chick. In: Andrew RJ (ed) Neural and behavioural plasticity. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andrew RJ (1997) Left and right hemisphere memory traces: their formation and fate. Laterality 2:179–198PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Andrew RJ (1999) The differential roles of right and left sides of the brain in memory formation. Behav Brain Res 98:289–295Google Scholar
  7. Andrew RJ, Brennan A (1985) Sharply timed and lateralised events at the time of establishment of long term memory. Physiol Behav 34:547–556PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Andrew RJ, Tommasi L, Ford N (2000) Motor control by vision and the evolution of cerebral lateralization. Brain Lang 73:220–235PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Byrne RA, Kuba M, Griebel U (2002) Lateral asymmetry of eye use in Octopus vulgaris. Anim Behav 64:461–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Capretta PJ (1969) The establishment of food preferences in chicks Gallus gallus. Anim Behav 17:229–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cherkin A (1969) Kinetics of memory consolidation: role of amnesic treatment parameters. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 63:1094–1101PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cooper R, Nudo N, González JM, Vinson SB, Liang H (2011) Side-dominance of Periplaneta americana persists through antenna amputation. J Insect Behav 24:175–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cresswell W (1994) Flocking is an effective anti-predation strategy in redshanks, Tringa totanus. Anim Behav 47:433–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Daisley JN, Mascalzoni E, Rosa Salva O, Rugani R, Regolin L (2009) Lateralization of social cognition in the domestic chicken (Gallus gallus). Phil Trans Royal Soc Lond B Biol Sci 364:965–981Google Scholar
  15. Daisley JN, Vallortigara G, Regolin L (2010) Logic in an asymmetrical (social) brain: transitive inference in the young domestic chick. Soc Neurosci 5:309–319PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davison A, Frend HT, Moray C, Wheatley H, Searle LJ, Eichhorn MP (2009) Mating behaviour in Lymnaea stagnalis pond snails is a maternally inherited, lateralized trait. Biol Lett 5:20–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Deng C, Rogers LJ (2002a) Factors affecting the development of lateralization in chicks. In: Rogers LJ, Andrew RJ (eds) Comparative vertebrate lateralization. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Deng C, Rogers LJ (2002b) Social recognition and approach in the chick: lateralization and effect of visual experience. Anim Behav 63:697–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dharmaretnam M, Andrew RJ (1994) Age- and stimulus-specific use of right and left eyes by the domestic chick. Anim Behav 48:1395–1406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Emery NJ, Clayton NS (2005) Animal cognition. In: Bolhuis JJ, Giraldeau LA (eds) The behavior of animals: mechanisms, function and evolution. Blackwell Publishing, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. Entenman C, Lorenz FW, Chaikoff IL (1940) The lipid content of blood, liver and yolk sac of the newly hatched chick and the changes that occur in these tissues during the first month of life. J Biol Chem 133:231–241Google Scholar
  22. Fantz RL (1957) Form preferences in newly hatched chicks. J Comp Physiol Psychol 50:422–430PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fernandez-Carriba SF, Loeches A, Morcillo A, Hopkins WD (2002) Functional asymmetry of emotions in primates: new findings in chimpanzees. Brain Res Bull 57:561–564PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gajdon GK (2001) Social modification of early foraging in domestic chickens, Gallus gallus domesticus. Dissertation, ETH Zürich No. 14403Google Scholar
  25. Gajdon GK, Hungerbühler N, Stauffacher M (2001) Social influence on early foraging of domestic chicks (Gallus gallus) in a near-to-nature procedure. Ethology 107:913–937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Galef BG (1988) Imitation in animals: history, definition and interpretation of data from the psychological laboratory. In: Zentall TR, Galef BG (eds) Social learning: psychological and biological perspectives. Erlbaum, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  27. Gibbs ME, Ng KT (1977) Psychobiology of memory: towards a model of memory formation. Biobehav Rev 1:113–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gibbs ME, Andrew RJ, Ng KT (2003) Hemispheric lateralization of memory stages for discriminated avoidance learning in the chick. Behav Brain Res 139:157–165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Goodwin EB, Hess EH (1969) Innate visual form preferences in the pecking behaviour of young chicks. Behaviour 34:223–237PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hamilton WD (1971) Geometry for the selfish herd. J Theor Biol 31:295–311PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Heyes CM, Galef BG (1996) Social learning in animals: the roots of culture. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Hobert O, Johnston RJJ, Chang S (2002) Left-right asymmetry in the nervous system: the Caenorhabditis elegans model. Nat Rev Neurosci 3:629–640PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hogan JA (1971) The development of a hunger system in young chicks. Behaviour 39:128–201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hogan JA (1973) Development of food recognition in young chicks: I. Maturation and nutrition. J Comp Physiol Psychol 83:355–366PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hogan-Warburg NA, Hogan JA (1981) Feeding strategies in the development of food recognition in young chicks. Anim Behav 29:143–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Johnston ANB, Burne THJ, Rose SPR (1998) Observation learning in day-old chicks using a one-trial passive avoidance learning paradigm. Anim Behav 56:1347–1353PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kight SL, Steelman L, Coffey G, Lucente J, Castillo M (2008) Evidence of population-level lateralized behaviour in giant water bugs, Belostoma flumineum Say (Heteroptera: Belostomatidae): t-maze turning is left biased. Behav Process 79:66–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Koshiba M, Nakamura S, Deng C, Rogers LJ (2003) Light-dependent development of asymmetry in the ipsilateral and contralateral thalamofugal visual projections of the chick. Neurosci Lett 336:81–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lössner B, Rose SP (1983) Passive avoidance training increases fucokinase activity in right forebrain base of day-old chicks. J Neurochem 41:1357–1363PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. MacNeilage PF, Rogers LJ, Vallortigara G (2009) Origins of the left and right brain. Sci Am 301:60–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McKenzie R, Andrew RJ (1996) Brief retention deficits associated with cyclically recurring left hemisphere events. Physiol Behav 60:1323–1329PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McKenzie R, Andrew RJ, Jones RB (1998) Lateralization in chicks and hens: new evidence for control of response by the right eye system. Neuropsychologia 36:51–58PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Moffat CA, Hogan JA (1992) Ontogeny of chick responses to maternal food calls in the Burmese red junglefowl (Gallus gallus spadiceus). J Comp Psychol 106:92–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nicol CJ (2004) Development, direction and damage limitation: social learning in domestic fowl. Learn Behav 32:72–81PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nicol CJ (2006) How animals learn from each other. Appl Anim Behav Sci 100:58–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nicol CJ, Pope SJ (1996) The maternal feeding display of domestic hens is sensitive to perceived chick error. Anim Behav 52:767–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pascual A, Huang KL, Nevue J, Préat T (2004) Brain asymmetry and long-term memory. Nature 427:605–606PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Patterson TA, Gilbert DB, Rose SP (1990) Pre- and post-training lesions of the intermediate medial hyperstriatum ventrale and passive avoidance learning in the chick. Exp Brain Res 80:189–195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pusey AE (2005) Social systems. In: Bolhuis JJ, Giraldeau LA (eds) The behavior of animals: mechanisms, function and evolution. Blackwell Publishing, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  50. Quaranta A, Siniscalchi M, Vallortigara G (2007) Asymmetric tail-wagging responses by dogs to different emotive stimuli. Curr Biol 17:R199–R201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Regolin L, Marconato F, Vallortigara G (2004) Hemispheric differences in the recognition of partly occluded objects by newly hatched domestic chicks (Gallus gallus). Anim Cogn 7:162–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rickard NS, Gibbs ME (2003a) Effects of nitric oxide inhibition on avoidance learning in the chick are lateralized and localized. Neurobiol Learn Mem 79:252–256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rickard NS, Gibbs ME (2003b) Hemispheric dissociation of the involvement of NOS isoforms in memory for discriminated avoidance in the chick. Learn Mem 10:314–318PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rogers LJ (1997) Early experiential effects on laterality: research on chicks has relevance to other species. Laterality 2:199–219PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Rogers LJ (2008) Development and function of lateralization in the avian brain. Brain Res Bull 76:235–244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rogers LJ, Andrew RJ (2002) Comparative vertebrate lateralization. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rogers LJ, Deng C (1999) Light experience and lateralization of the two visual pathways in the chick. Behav Brain Res 98:277–287PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rogers LJ, Sink HS (1988) Transient asymmetry in the projections of the rostral thalamus to the visual hyperstriatum of the chicken, and reversal of its direction by light exposure. Exp Brain Res 70:378–384PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rogers LJ, Vallortigara G (2008) From antenna to antenna: lateral shift of olfactory memory recall by honeybees. PLoS ONE 3:e2340PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rosa Salva O, Regolin L, Vallortigara G (2007) Chicks discriminate human gaze with their right hemisphere. Behav Brain Res 177:15–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rosa Salva O, Daisley JN, Regolin L, Vallortigara G (2009) Lateralization of social learning in the domestic chick (Gallus gallus): learning to avoid. Anim Behav 78:847–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rosa Salva O, Daysley JN, Regolin L, Vallortigara G (2010) Time-dependent lateralization of social learning in the domestic chick (Gallus gallus domesticus): effects of retention delays in the observed lateralization pattern. Behav Brain Res 212:152–158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rosa Salva O, Regolin L, Mascalzoni, L, Vallortigara G (2012) Cerebral and behavioural asymmetries in animal social recognition. Comp Cogn Behav Rev 7:110–138Google Scholar
  64. Rose SP (2000) God’s organism? The chick as a model system for memory studies. Learn Mem 7:1–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sandi C, Patterson TA, Rose SP (1993) Visual input and lateralization of brain function in learning in the chick. Neuroscience 52:393–401PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sherwin CM, Heyes C, Nicol CJ (2002) Social learning influences the preferences of domestic hens for novel food. Anim Behav 63:933–942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Smith CL, Evans CS (2008) Multimodal signaling in fowl, Gallus gallus. J Exp Biol 211:2052–2057PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sovrano VA, Rainoldi C, Bisazza A, Vallortigara G (1999) Roots of brain specializations: preferential left-eye use during mirror-image inspection in six species of teleost fish. Behav Brain Res 106:175–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Stokes AW (1971) Parental and courtship feeding in red jungle fowl. Auk 88:21–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Stokes AW, Williams DHW (1971) Courtship feeding in gallinaceous birds. Auk 88:543–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Stokes AW, Williams DHW (1972) Courtship feeding calls in gallinaceous birds. Auk 89:177–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tommasi L, Vallortigara G (2001) Encoding of geometric and landmark information in the left and right hemispheres of the avian brain. Behav Neurosci 115:602–613PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Vallortigara G (1992) Right hemisphere advantage for social recognition in the chick. Neuropsychologia 30:761–768PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Vallortigara G (2000) Comparative neuropsychology of the dual brain: a stroll through animals’ left and right perceptual worlds. Brain Lang 73:189–219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Vallortigara G, Andrew RJ (1991) Lateralization of response by chicks to change in a model partner. Anim Behav 41:187–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Vallortigara G, Andrew RJ (1994) Differential involvement of the right and left hemisphere in individual recognition in domestic chick. Behav Process 33:41–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Vallortigara G, Rogers LJ (2005) Survival with an asymmetrical brain: advantages and disadvantages of cerebral lateralization. Behav Brain Sci 28:575–589PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Vallortigara G, Regolin L, Bortolomiol G, Tommasi L (1996) Lateral asymmetries due to preferences in eye use during visual discrimination learning in chicks. Behav Brain Res 74:135–143PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Vallortigara G, Rogers LJ, Bisazza A, Lippolis G, Robins A (1998) Complementary right and left hemifield use for predatory and agonistic behaviour in toads. NeuroReport 9:3341–3344PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Vallortigara G, Rogers LJ, Bisazza A (1999) Possible evolutionary origins of cognitive brain lateralization. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 30:164–175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wauters AM, Richard-Yris MA, Pierre JS, Lunel C, Richard JP (1999) Influence of chicks and food quality on food calling in broody domestic hens. Behaviour 136:919–933CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Orsola Rosa Salva
    • 1
  • Lucia Regolin
    • 2
  • Giorgio Vallortigara
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Mind/Brain Sciences (CIMeC)University of TrentoRoveretoItaly
  2. 2.Department of General PsychologyUniversity of PadovaPaduaItaly

Personalised recommendations