Skip to main content
  • 4978 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die Häufigkeit vaginal-operativer Eingriffe wie Forzeps- oder Vakuumextraktion ist unbekannt. Nach Martin et al. liegt die Anzahl vaginal-operativer Eingriffe in den USA bei 8% (Martin et al. 2003).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Allen VM, O’Connell CM, Baskett TF (2005) Maternal and perinatal morbidity for cesarean delivery at full dilatation compared with cesarean delivery in the first stage of labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 112(7): 986–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blickstein I (2004) Difficult delivery of the impacted fetal head during caesarean section: intraoperative disengagement dystocia. J Perinat Med 32(6): 465–469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bofill JA, Rust OA, Schorr SJ (1996) A randomized prospective trial of the obstetrics forceps versus the M-cup vacuum extractor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175(5): 1325–1330

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers JA, Chalmers I (1989) The obstetric extractor is the instrument of first choice for operative vaginal delivery. Br J Obstet Gynecol 96:505–509

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheong YC, Abdulaahi H, Lashen FM, Fairli FM (2004) Can formal education and training improve the outcome of instrumental delivery? Eur J Obstet Gynecol 191: 139–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehlers N, Krarup Jensen IB, Brogard Hansen K (1974) Retinal haemorrhage in the newborn. Comparison of delivery by forceps and by vacuum extractor. Acta Ophthalmol 52:73–82

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Enkin MW, Keirse M, Renfrew M, Neilson J (1995) A guide to effective care in pregnancy and childbirth, 2nd edn. Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • University P, Oxford Groß MM, Dudenhausen JW (1998) Effektive Betreuung während Schwangerschaft und Geburt. Ullstein Medical, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopp H, Kalache K (2011) Vaginaloperative Entbindung. In: Scheider H, Husslein P, Schneider KTM (2001) Die Geburtshilfe, 4. Aufl. Kap 39:S 867–884

    Google Scholar 

  • Janni W, Schieel B, Peschers U et al. (2002) The prognostic impact of a prolonged second stage of labor on maternal and fetal outcome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 81:214–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson RB, Menon V (2006) Vacuum extraction versus forceps delivery for assisted vaginal delivery. Cochrane Database 2:pp 1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanson RB, Wilkinson P, Bastible A et al. (1993) Health after assisted vaginal delivery; follow-up of a random controlled study. J Obstet Gynecol 13:242–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson RB, Rice C, Doyle M et al. (1993) A randomised prospective study comparing the new vacuum extractor policy with forceps delivery. Br J Obstet Gynecol 100:524–530

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Majoko F, Gardener G (2008) Trial of instrumental delivery in theatre versus immediate caesarean section for anticipated difficult assisted births. The Cochrane Collaboration – Editorial Group Cochrane Pregnacy and Childbirth. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD et al. (2003) Births: Final data for (2002) National Vital Statistics Report 52: 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy DJ, Liebling RE, Verity L et al. (2001) Early maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with operative delivery in second stage of labour: a cohort study. Lancet 358:1203–1207

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sau A, Sau M, Ahmed H, Brown (2004) Vacuum extraction: is there any need to improve the current training in the UK? Acta Obstet et Gynecol Scand 83: 466–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Vacca A, Grant AM (1983) Portmouth operative delivery trial. A randomised controlled trial to compare vacuum extraction with forceps delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 15:305–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wacker J, Engel K, Ritter H (1994) Geburtshilfliche Operationen. In: Wacker J, Balde MD, Bastert G (Hrsg) Geburtshilfe unter einfachen Bedingungen. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, S 173–197

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Williams MC, Knuppel RA, O’Brien WF, Weiss A, Kanarek KS (1991) A randomised comparison of assisted vaginal delivbery by obstetrics forceps and polyethylene vacuum cup. Obstet Gynecol 78:789–794

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Yancey MK et al. (2001) Does epidural analgesia prolong labor and increse rise of cesarean delivery? A nature experiment. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:128–134

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wacker, J. (2013). Vaginal-operative Eingriffe. In: Wacker, J., Sillem, M., Bastert, G., Beckmann, M. (eds) Therapiehandbuch Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30189-6_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30189-6_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30188-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30189-6

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics