Organisational and Personnel Development Tools in the Neuroscience Spotlight

  • Argang Ghadiri
  • Andreas Habermacher
  • Theo Peters
Part of the Management for Professionals book series (MANAGPROF)


In this chapter we will look into specific instruments and theories from organisational and personnel development and leadership concepts and look at these through the spectacles of neuroscience and the four basic needs. This will enable us to evaluate these current approaches from a neuroscientific view and therefore to highlight their effects on personnel and the environment from a viewpoint of the brain and the four basic needs.


Emotional Intelligence Leadership Style Coaching Programme Democratic Leadership Participative Leadership 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Baumgartner, T., Heinrichs, M., Vonlanthen, A., Fischbacher, U., & Fehr, E. (2008). Oxytocin shapes the neural circuitry of trust and trust adaptation in humans. Neuron, 58(4), 639–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barclay, P., 2006. Reputational benefits for altruistic punishment. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(5), pp. 325–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boudreau, C., McCubbins, M.D. & Coulson, S., 2009. Knowing when to trust others: An ERP study of decision making after receiving information from unknown people. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 4(1), pp. 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burnham, T., McCabe, K. & Smith, V.L., 2000. Friend-or-foe intentionality priming in an extensive form trust game. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 43(1), pp. 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Korsten, N., Fragopanagos, N., Taylor, J. G. (2007). Neural substructures for appraisal in emotion: Self-esteem and depression. Proceedings of the 17th international conference on artificial neural networks, pp. 850–858.Google Scholar
  6. Pillay, S. S. (2009). The neuroscience of change and transformation. New York.Google Scholar
  7. Rock, D. (2009). Managing with the brain in mind. Neuroscience Research, 1(1), 1.Google Scholar
  8. Zink, C. F., Tong, Y., Chen, Q., Bassett, D. S., Stein, J. L., & Meyer-Lindenberg, A. (2008). Know your place: Neural processing of social hierarchy in humans. Neuron, 58(2), 273–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hüther, G. (2009). Wie gehirngerechte Führung funktioniert: Neurobiologie für Manager. managerSeminare, 130, 30–34.Google Scholar
  10. Reif, W. E., & Schoderbek, P. P. (1966). Job enlargement: Antidote to apathy. Human Resource Management, 5(1), 16–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Olfert, K. (2010). Personalwirtschaft (14th ed.). Ludwigshafen: Kiehl.Google Scholar
  12. Herzberg, F. (2003). One more time: How do you motivate employees? 1968. Harvard Business Review, 81(1), 87–96.Google Scholar
  13. Schultz, D., & Schultz, S. E. (2009). Psychology and work today (10th ed., pp. 136–144). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  14. Cunningham, J. B., & Eberle, T. (1990). A guide to job enrichment and design. Personnel, 67(2), 56–61.Google Scholar
  15. Mohr, R. D., & Zoghi, C. (2006). Is job enrichment really enriching? Statistics.Google Scholar
  16. Pfeiffer, W., Dörrie, U., & Stoll, E. (1977). Menschliche Arbeit in der industriellen Produktion. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
  17. Roth, W. (1999). The roots and future of management theory: A systems perspective (pp. 141–145). Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  18. Gullowsen, J. (1972). A measure of work group autonomy. In Job design (pp. 374–390). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  19. Turner, L., & Sandberg, A. (1996). Enriching production. Perspectives on Volvo’s Uddevalla plant as an alternative to lean production – Sandberg, A. mpraubunimuenchende, 50(2), 359.Google Scholar
  20. Semler, R., Semler, A. C., Paulo, S., Semler, A., Plan, N. S. (1998). Ricardo Semler and Semco S.A.Google Scholar
  21. Semler, R., 2006. Out of This World: Doing Things the Semco Way. In R. P. Gandossy, E. Tucker, & N. Verma, eds. Workforce Wake-Up Call: Your Workforce Is Changing, Are You? Hoboken: Hewitt Associates, pp. 187–199.Google Scholar
  22. Vanderburg, D. (2004). The story of Semco: The company that humanized work. Bulletin of Science Technology Society, 24(5), 430–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Semler, R. (1994). Why my former employees still work for me. Harvard Business Review, 72(1), 64–71.Google Scholar
  24. Manz, C. C., Shipper, F., & Stewart, G. L. (2009). Everyone a team leader: Shared influence at W. L. Gore & Associates. Organizational Dynamics, 38(3), 239–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hackmann, J. R., & Suttle, J. L. (1977). Improving life at work: Behavioral science approaches to organizational change (p. 128). Santa Monica: Goodyear.Google Scholar
  26. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1991). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience (1st ed.). New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  27. Allport, G. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  28. Northouse, P. G. (2008). Introduction to leadership: Concepts and practice (p. 20). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  29. Hoffman, B. J., Woehr, D. J., Maldagen-Youngjohn, R., & Lyons, B. D. (2011). Great man or great myth? A quantitative review of the relationship between individual differences and leader effectiveness. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84(2), 347–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Blake, R., & Mouton, J. (1964). The managerial grid: The key to leadership excellence. Houston: Gulf Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  31. Drucker, P.F., 1954. The Practice of Management, New York, Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  32. Egan, G., 1997. Skilled Helper: A Problem-Management Approach to Helping 6th ed., Belmont: Wadsworth Pub Co.Google Scholar
  33. Fiedler, F. F. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness (Vol. 111, no. 2, p. 310). New York: McGraw-Hill, p. viii.Google Scholar
  34. Vroom, V. H., & Yetton, P. W. (1973). Leadership and decision-making (Vol. 18, no. 4, p. 556). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  35. Greenberg and Baron, 2008.Google Scholar
  36. Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. (1993). Management of organizational behavior (Vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 45–65). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  37. Goleman, D., Boytzis, R., & McKee, A. (2002). Primal leadership: Realizing the power of emotional intelligence. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar
  38. Harris, T. A. (1973). I’m ok – you're ok. New York: First Avon Books.Google Scholar
  39. Hersey, P., Blanchard, K.H. & Johnson, D.E., 2001. Management of organizational behavior: Leading human resources 8th ed., Upper Saddle River: Prentiee Hall.Google Scholar
  40. Hurley, R.F., 2006. The decision to trust. Harvard Business Review, 84(9), pp. 55–62, 156.Google Scholar
  41. Kosfeld, M. et al., 2005. Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature, 435(7042), pp. 673–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ross, C.E., 2011. Collective Threat, Trust, and the Sense of Personal Control. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, (September).Google Scholar
  43. Salamon, S.D. & Robinson, S.L., 2008. Trust that binds: the impact of collective felt trust on organizational performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), pp. 593–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Van Den Bos, W. et al., 2009. What motivates repayment? Neural correlates of reciprocity in the Trust Game. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 4(3), pp. 294–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Williams, M., 2007. Building genuine trust through interpersonal emotion management: A threat regulation model of trust and collaboration across boundaries. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), pp. 595–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Whitmore, J., 2002. Coaching for Performance 3rd ed., London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.Google Scholar
  47. Watt, D. F., (1999). Towards a science of consciousness III: The Third Tucson Discussion and Debates. In S. R. Hameroff, A. W. Kazniak, & D. J. Chalmers (Eds.), At the intersection of emotion and consciousness: Affective neuroscience and extended reticular thalamic activating system (ERTAS) theories of consciousness (p. 216). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Argang Ghadiri
    • 1
  • Andreas Habermacher
    • 2
  • Theo Peters
    • 1
  1. 1.Business Administration Bonn-Rhine-SiegUniversity of Applied SciencesSankt AugustinGermany
  2. 2.ctp, corporate training programmesZuerichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations