Advertisement

Four Basic Human Needs at the Heart of Neuroscience

  • Argang Ghadiri
  • Andreas Habermacher
  • Theo Peters
Chapter
Part of the Management for Professionals book series (MANAGPROF)

Abstract

The brain is a complex organ and the variations in human behaviour are also a seemingly endless sea of subtle differences. This poses many challenges in trying to find clearer answers to human behaviour in any context but also specifically in the context of business administration. This chapter therefore aims to go to the basis of human behaviour. We draw on the work of Klaus Grawe to highlight how neuroscience has combined with psychotherapy and psychology to understand what the very neural substrates are at the basis of human behaviour. This chapter takes us through what we can see as the neuroscientifically founded basic needs of human beings and how this will subsequently influence each of our motivational behaviours and hence our way of interacting with the world around us.

Keywords

Human Behaviour Attachment Theory Avoidance Schema Motivational Schema Business Administration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Gazzaniga, M. S., Ivry, R. B., & Mangun, G. R. (2008). Cognitive neuroscience: The biology of mind (excerpt). In Cognitive neuroscience the biology of mind (pp. 148–159). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Grawe, K. (2007). Review of neuropsychotherapy: How the neurosciences inform effective psychotherapy and neuropsychotherapie (neuropsychotherapy), (Vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 118–120). Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Epstein, S., & Weiner, I. B. (2003). Cognitive-experiential self-theory of personality. In M. J. Lerner (Ed.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology volume 5 personality and social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 159–184). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Bowlby, J., Ainsworth, M., & Bretherton, I. (1992). The origins of attachment theory. Developmental Psychology, 28(5), 759–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Feist, E. & Primis, H., 2010. Psychology: Making connections, Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  6. Bowlby, J., 1951. Maternal Care and Mental Health, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Harlow, H. F. (1958). The nature of love. The American Psychologist, 13(2), 673–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Matthiesen, A. S., Ransjö-Arvidson, A. B., Nissen, E., & Uvnäs-Moberg, K. (2001). Postpartum maternal oxytocin release by newborns: effects of infant hand massage and sucking. Birth Berkeley Calif, 28(1), 13–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Palmer, L.F., 2002. Bonding Matters: The Chemistry of Attachment. Attachment Parenting International News, 5(2).Google Scholar
  10. Carmichael, M. S., Humbert, R., Dixen, J., Palmisano, G., Greenleaf, W., & Davidson, J. M. (1987). Plasma oxytocin increases in the human sexual response. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 64(1), 27–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kosfeld, M. et al., 2005. Oxytocin increases trust in humans, Nature Publishing Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Neuberger, O. (2006). Mikropolitik und moral in organisationen. Stuttgart: UTB GmbH.Google Scholar
  13. Whalen, P. J. (1998). Fear, vigilance, and ambiguity: Initial neuroimaging studies of the human amygdala. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7(6), 177–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cast, A. D., & Burke, P. (2002). A theory of self-esteem. Social Forces, 80(3), 1041–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grawe, K. (2006). Neuropsychotherapy: How the neurosciences inform effective psychotherapy. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  16. Gyurak, A., Hooker, C. I., Miyakawa, A., Verosky, S., Luerssen, A., & Ayduk, O. N. (2011). Individual differences in neural responses to social rejection: the joint effect of self-esteem and attentional control. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 19(3), 279–280.Google Scholar
  17. Somerville, L. H., Kelley, W. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (2010). Self-esteem modulates medial prefrontal cortical responses to evaluative social feedback. Cerebral Cortex, 20(12), 3005–3013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eisenberger, N. I., Inagaki, T. K., Muscatell, K. A., Byrne Haltom, K. E., & Leary, M. R. (Nov. 2011). The neural sociometer: Brain mechanisms underlying state self-esteem. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(11), 3448–3455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Korsten, N., Fragopanagos, N., Taylor, J. G. (2007). Neural substructures for appraisal in emotion: Self-esteem and depression. Proceedings of the 17th international conference on artificial neural networks, pp. 850–858.Google Scholar
  20. Williams, L. M. (2006). An integrative neuroscience model of ‘significance’ processing. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, 5(1), 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McGilchrist, I. (2009). The master and his emissary: The divided brain and the making of the Western world. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Tupes, E. C., & Christal, R. E. (1961). Recurrent personality factors based on trait raitings (Technical report ASD-TR-61-97). Wiley Online Library.Google Scholar
  23. Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41(1), 417–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. The American Psychologist, 48(1), 26–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Saulsman, L. (2004). The five-factor model and personality disorder empirical literature: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 23(8), 1055–1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grosse Holtforth, M., Pincus, A. L., Grawe, K., Mauler, B., & Castonguay, L. G. (2007). When what you want is not what you get: Motivational correlates of interpersonal problems in clinical and nonclinical samples. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26(10), 1095–1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Grosse Holtforth, M., & Grawe, K. (2000). Fragebogen zur Analyse Motivationaler Schemata (FAMOS). Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 29(3), 170–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grosse Holtforth, M., & Grawe, K. (2003). Der Inkongruenzfragebogen (INK). Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 32(4), 315–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Williams, M. (2007). Building genuine trust through interpersonal emotion management: A threat regulation model of trust and collaboration across boundaries. The Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 595–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Professional manual: Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  32. Eysenck, H. J. (1967). The biological basis of personality. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas Publisher.Google Scholar
  33. Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, M. W. (1985). Personality and individual differences: A natural science approach. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kumari, V., et al. (2004). Personality predicts brain responses to cognitive demands. The Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 10636–10641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Argang Ghadiri
    • 1
  • Andreas Habermacher
    • 2
  • Theo Peters
    • 1
  1. 1.Business Administration Bonn-Rhine-SiegUniversity of Applied SciencesSankt AugustinGermany
  2. 2.ctp, corporate training programmesZuerichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations