Advertisement

Neuroleadership: The Backdrop

  • Argang Ghadiri
  • Andreas Habermacher
  • Theo Peters
Chapter
Part of the Management for Professionals book series (MANAGPROF)

Abstract

This chapter aims to answer the simple question of what neuroleadership is. In addition we need to understand where it ties into current economic theory, if at all, and where it ties into the field of business and management theory, if at all. We will therefore outline what the current and developing “neuro” fields are, where they overlap, and where they tie together. We also propose a new term to create consistency within the fields of research. This will be followed by an historical overview of man’s concept of man—the being that economic and business theory is based upon. This will lead us to the stage we are at today in defining neuroleadership and also that of defining the concept of man according to the brain.

Keywords

Human Behaviour Human Nature Personality Type Business Administration Homo Economicus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Zak, P. J. (2004). Neuroeconomics the royal society neuroeconomics. Society, 2009, 1737–1748.Google Scholar
  2. Camerer, C. F., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2004). Neuroeconomics: Why economics needs brains. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106(3), 555–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2005). Neuroeconomics: How neuroscience can inform economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 43(1), 9–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Glimcher, P., W. et al. (2008). Neuroeconomics: Decision Making and the Brain, London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  5. Schilke, O., & Reimann, M. (2007). Neuroökonomie: Grundverständnis, Methoden und betriebswirtschaftliche Anwendungsfelder. Journal für Betriebswirtschaft, 57(3), 247–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Reimann, M., & Weber, B. (2011). Neuroökonomie (pp. 3–9). Wiesbaden: Gabler.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Taylor, F.W., 1911. Principles of Scientific Management, New York: Harper & BrothersGoogle Scholar
  8. Persky, J. (1995). Retrospectives the ethology of homo economicus. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(2), 221–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Backhouse, R. E., & Medema, S. G. (2009). Defining economics: The long road to acceptance of the robbins definition. Economica, 76, 805–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bruce, K. (2006). Henry S. Dennison, Elton Mayo, and Human relations historiography. Management and Organizational History, 1(2), 177–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mayo, E. (1949). Hawthorne and the western electric company. In D. S. Pugh (Ed.), Organization theory selected readings. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  12. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Schein, E.H., 1980. Organizational psychology 3rd ed., Eaglewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  14. Lieberman, S. (1956). The effects of changes in roles on the attitudes of role occupants. Human Relations, 9(4), 385–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Myers, I., 1962. Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  17. Belbin, R. M. (1981). Management teams: Why they succeed or fail Author: R. Meredith Belbin. R&D Management, 12(3), 147–148.Google Scholar
  18. Blinkhorn, S. F. (1997). Past imperfect, future conditional: Fifty years of test theory. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 50(2), 175–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ulich, E. (2005). Arbeitspsychologie. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.Google Scholar
  20. Senge, P. M. (2004). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization (Vol. 58, no. 2, p. 445). New York: Currency Doubleday.Google Scholar
  21. Van Maurik, J. (2001). Writers on leadership. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  22. Spillane, R. (2012). Why workplaces must resist the cult of personality testing. Available at: 687 http://theconversation.edu.au/why-workplaces-must-resist-the-cult-of-personality-testing-6885540 [Accessed 12 September 2012].
  23. Jonathan Haidt, The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment. Psychological Review 108.4 (2001): 814–834.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Argang Ghadiri
    • 1
  • Andreas Habermacher
    • 2
  • Theo Peters
    • 1
  1. 1.Business Administration Bonn-Rhine-SiegUniversity of Applied SciencesSankt AugustinGermany
  2. 2.ctp, corporate training programmesZuerichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations