Single Sideband Encoder with Nonlinear Filter Bank Using Denoising for Cochlear Implant Speech Processor

  • Rohini S. Hallikar
  • M. Uttara Kumari
  • K. Padmaraju
Part of the Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing book series (AINSC, volume 166)


Cochlear Implants (CI) are the most successful neural prosthesis used to restore normal hearing to the profoundly deaf, by electrical stimulation of the auditory nerves. The use of speech coder is very crucial in the cochlear implant to obtain a very close resemblance of the normal hearing. Use of noise reduction techniques further enhances a satisfactory hearing in noisy conditions. We propose a new method of sound processing which gives improved speech recognition. To achieve this goal we implemented denoising technique and further adopted SSB demodulation along with a non linear filterbank such as The Dual Resonance Non Linear (DRNL) which is capable of modeling the behavior of the human cochlea. Comparative analysis was done to understand the performance of the proposed method with existing method. Simulation results showed a significant improvement in the speech recognition over existing method.


Neural Prosthesis Cochlear Implants DRNL Denoising 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Zeng, F.-G. IEEE Senior member, Rebscher, S., Harrison, W., Sun, X., Feng, H.: Cochlear implants: system design, integration, and evaluation. A Clinical Application Review, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering 1, 115–142 (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kyung, H.K., Sung, J.C., Jin, H.K., Doo, H.K.: An improved speech processing strategy for cochlear implants based on an active nonlinear filterbank model of the biological cochlea. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Garcia, E.: A Tutorial on Correlation Coefficients (July 8, 2010) (last modified on January 8, 2011) Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Marracci, M., Tellini, B., Lazzarino, L.L., Giannetti, R.: On the use of the Dual Resonance Non Linear filter for speech processing in a Hearing Aid AlgorithmGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Loizou, P.C.: Speech processing in vocoder-centric cochlear implants, pp. 109–143 (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wilson, B.S., Niparko, J.K. (eds.): Strategies for representing speech information with cochlear implants, in cochlear implants: principles and practices, pp. 129–170. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nogueira, W., Buchner, A., Lenarz, T., Edler, B.: A psychoacoustic “NofM”-type speech coding strategy for cochlear implants published in the EURASIP. Journal on Applied Signal Processing (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen, W.-B., Zhou, L.-H., Xiao, Z.-J., Chen, G.-J., Wang, L.-J.: A new speech coding for improving the quality of cochlear implant. BioMedical Engineering and Informatics (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nie, K., Atlas, L., Rubinstein, J.: Single sideband encoder for music coding in cochlear implants. Departments of Otolaryngology, Bioengineering, and Electrical Engineering Virginia Marrill Bloedel Hearing Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, USA. IEEE (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rohini S. Hallikar
    • 1
  • M. Uttara Kumari
    • 1
  • K. Padmaraju
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ECER.V. College of EngineeringBangaloreIndia
  2. 2.Departments of ECEJNT UniversityKakinadaIndia

Personalised recommendations