Advertisement

Adaptation of Cognitive Psychological Framework as Knowledge Explication Strategy

  • S. Maria Wenisch
  • A. Ramachandran
  • G. V. Uma
Part of the Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing book series (AINSC, volume 166)

Abstract

The differences between the way an indigenous expert understands and the way a scientific expert understands a natural resource which are incomplete in themselves can become complementary and become a major strength in achieving sustainability. An integrated system approach is the best practice of managing natural resource. In knowledge management integration is viewed in terms of horizontal and vertical dimensions. The study presents the possibility of knowledge sharing and integration between indigenous and scientific experts in a multi level multi criteria decision making environment using a cognitive psychological model of knowledge discovery called Johari Window model for knowledge sharing in the management of natural resource. Knowledge integration facilitates higher level of knowledge explication. Johari window presents a framework for knowledge integration. The advantage of this model is that it takes the problem of ‘the fourth quadrant’, where very large totally unexplored unpredicted outliers lie, into its account. Knowledge system becomes more robust, efficient and sustainable by narrowing down the knowledge gap between the experts.

Keywords

Multiagent System Natural Resource Management Indigenous Knowledge Dark Spot Knowledge State 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Agrawal, A. : Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge: Some Critical Comments. IK Monitor 3 (2004), http://www.nuffic.nl/ciran/ikdm/3-3/articles/agrawal.html (cited January 5, 2004)
  2. 2.
    Rahman, A.: Development of an Integrated Traditional and Scientific Knowledge Base: A Mechanism for Accessing, Benefit-Sharing and Documenting Traditional Knowledge for Sustainable Socio-Economic Development and Poverty Alleviation. UNCTAD, Geneva (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rotha, C., Cointet, J.-P.: Social and Semantic Coevolution in Knowledge Networks. Social Networks 32, 16–29 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, K., Wang, H., Lai, H.: A General Knowledge Mediation Infrastructure for Multiagent Systems. Expert Systems with Applications 38, 495–503 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yang, C.-W., Fang, S.-C., Lin, J.L.: Organisational Knowledge Creation Strategies: A Conceptual Framework. International Journal of Information Management 30, 231–238 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lwoga, E.T., Ngulube, P., Stilwell, C.: Managing Indigenous Knowledge for Sustainable Agricultural Development in Developing Countries: Knowledge Management Approaches in the Social Context. The International Information & Library Review 42, 174–185 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chang, H.H., Chuang, S.-S.: Social Capital and Individual Motivations on Knowledge Sharing:Participant Involvement as a Moderator. Information & Management 48, 9–18 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li, H.-L., Tang, M.-J.: Vertical Integration and Innovative Performance:The Effects of External Knowledge Sourcing Modes. Technovation 30, 401–410 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mercer, J., Kelman, I., Suchet-Pearson, S., Lloyd, K.: Integrating Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge Bases for Disaster Risk Reducation in Paupa New Guinea. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 91(2), 157–183 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mu, J., Tang, F., MacLachlan, D.L.: Absorptive and Disseminative Capacity: Knowledge Transfer in Intra-organization Networks. Expert Systems with Applications 37, 31–38 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hovelynck, J., Dewulf, A., Francois, G., Taillie, T.: Interdisciplinary Knowledge Integration Through Group Model Building: Recognizing Dualities and Triadizing the Conversation. Environmental Science & Policy 13, 582–591 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Janhonen, M., Johanson, J.-E.: Role of Knowledge Conversion and Social Networks in Team Performance. International Journal of Information Management 31(3), 217–225 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Singhal, R.: A Model for Integrating Indigenous and Scientific Forest Management: Potentials and Limitations for Adaptive Learning. In: Lawrence, A. (ed.) Forestry. Forest Users and Research: New Ways of Learning, pp. 131–137. ETFRN, Wageningen (2000)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Basaglia, S., Caporarello, L., Magnib, M., Pennarola, F.: IT Knowledge Integration Capability and Team Performance: The Role of Team Climate. International Journal of Information Management 30, 542–551 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rist, S., Dahdouh-Guebas, F.: Ethnosciences–A Step Towards the Integration of Scientific and Indigenous Forms of Knowledge in the Management of Natural Resources for the Future. Environ. Dev. Sustain (2006), doi:10.1007/s10668-006-9050-7Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang, X., Stolein, M., Wang, K.: Designing Knowledge Chain Networks in China — A proposal for a Risk Management System Using Linguistic Decision Making. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 77, 902–915 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Li, Y.-M., Jhang-Li, J.-H.: Knowledge Sharing in Communities of Practice: A Game Theoretic Analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 207, 1052–1064 (2010)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information Science and TechnologyAnna UniversityChennaiIndia
  2. 2.Center for Climate Change and Adaptation ResearchAnna UniversityChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations