Advertisement

Performance Analysis of (AIMM-I46) Addressing, Inter-mobility and Interoperability Management Architecture between IPv4 and IPv6 Networks

Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (volume 167)

Abstract

Transition and Mobility management has been a growing concern with numerous problems originating from roaming between IPv6 and IPv4 access networks owing to ever-growing research. Hence the various architectures concerning transition/mobility among IPv6 and IPv4 are studied. It is an observed fact that, there is still a need for more research to be done on the IPv6 transition in order to solve many problems that are not yet resolved. Henceforth, AIMM-I46 architecture has been proposed and designed as an integrated IPv4/IPv6 addressing, mobility and transition mechanism. In this paper, the performance of AIMM-I46 architecture analyzed when different data size, link capacity are used. Adventnet Network Simulator Toolkit 7 is used to evaluate the performance of AIMM-I46, using different performance evaluation metrics such as data loss rate, throughput, packet overhead and latency which have significant implications on any protocol performance. The simulated results shows that the proposed architecture provides inter mobility and interoperability between IPv4 and IPv6 networks.

Keywords

Mobility Architecture IPv4-IPv6 Interoperability Address Mapping Mixed Network IPv4 to IPv6 Address Mapping 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bradner, S., Mankin, A.: The Recommendation for the IP Next Generation Protocol. RFC 1752 (January 1995)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Esaki, H., Kato, A., Murai, J.: R&D Activities and Testbed Operation in WIDE Project. In: Proceedings of Symposium on Applications and the Internet, pp. 172–177 (January 2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Allied Telesis, IPv6 White Paper (2007), http://www.alliedtelesyn.com/media/pdf/ipv6_wp.pdf
  4. 4.
    Cisco, “IPv6 Assessment and Migration Services”, Whitepaper (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Microsoft, “IPv6/IPv4 Coexistence and Migration,” White Paper (August 2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nokia, “IPv6-Enabling the Mobile Internet,” White Paper (September 2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    IPv6 Task Force Editorial Group, Main Task force Report, Version 1.76, Document no.70 (February 11, 2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    EU fifth frame work, IPv6 Internet Initiative http://www.6init.com/
  9. 9.
    US IPv6 Research and Education Network (6REN), http://www.6ren.net/
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
    The Business Case and Roadmap for Completing IPv6 Adoption in US Government, Architecture and Infrastructure Committee, Federal Chief Information Officers Council, Version 0.1 (December 22, 2008), http://osrin.net/docs/DRAFT_Business_Case_&_Roadmap_for_Completing_IPv6_Adoption_in_USG_12242008.pdf
  13. 13.
    Dunn, T.: The IPv6 Transition, Market place. IEEE Internet Computing 6(3), 11–13 (2002)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bi, J., Wu, J., Leng, X.: IPv4/IPv6 Transition Technologies and Univer6 Architecture. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security 7(1), 232–242 (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Perkins, C.: IP Mobility Support, RFC 2002 (October 1996)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Perkins, C., Johnson, D., Arkko, J.: Mobility Support in IPv6, RFC 3775 (June 2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bound, J., Toutain, L., Richier, J.: Dual Stack IPv6 Dominant Transition Mechanism (DSTM), Internet Draft, draft-bound-dstm-exp-04.txt (October 2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tsirtsis, G., Park, V., Soliman, H.: Dual Stack Mobile IPv4, Internet Draft, draft-ietf-mip4-dsmipv4-06, IETF (February 2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Solima, H.: Mobile IPv6 support for dual stack Hosts and Routers, Internet Draft, draft-ietf-mext-nemo-v4traversal-03, IETF (May 2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Turanyi, Z.R., Szabo, C.: Global Internet Roaming with RoamIP. ACM Journal on Mobile Computing and Communications Review 4(3), 58–68 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liu, C.: Support Mobile IPv6 in IPv4 Domains. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Vehicular Technology (VTC), pp. 2700–2704 (May 2004) ISBN: 7803-8255-2/04Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Seo, S.-H., Kong, I.-Y.: A Performance Analysis Model of PC-based Software Router Supporting IPv6-IPv4 Translation for Residential Gateway. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Annual ACIS International Conference on Computer and Information Science, ICIS 2005 (2005) 0-7695-2296-3/05Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Aoun, C., Davies, E.: Reasons to Move the Network Address Translator - Protocol Translator. RFC 4966 (July 2007)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bangnulo, M., Matthews, P., van Beijnum, I.: NAT64/DNS64: Network Address and Protocol Translation from IPv6 Clients to IPv4 Servers", Internet Draft, draft-bagnulo-behave-nat64-00 (June 2008)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Srisuresh, P., Egevang, K.: Traditional IP Network Address Translator (Traditional NAT). RFC 3022 (January 2001)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nordmark, E.: Stateless IP/ICMP Translation Algorithm (SIIT), RFC 2765 (February 2000)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mackay, M., Edwards, C., Dunmore, M., Chown, T., Carvalho, G.: A Scenario-Based Review of IPv6 Transition Tools. IEEE Internet Computing, 27–35 (May-June 2003) 1089-7801/03Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    AlJa’afreh, R., Mellor, J., Awan, I.: Implementation of IPv4/IPv6 BDMS Translation Mechanism. In: IEEE Proceedings of the Second UKSIM European Symposium on Computer Modeling and Simulation, pp. 512–517 (2008) ISBN 978-0-7695-3325-4/08Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hagino, J., Yamamoto, K.: An IPv6-to-IPv4 Transport Relay Translator, RFC 3142 (June 2001)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kitamura, H.: A SOCKS-based IPv6/IPv4 Gateway Mechanism, RFC 3089 (April 2001)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lee, S., Shin, M.-K., Kim, Y.-J., Nordmark, E., Durand, A.: Dual Stack Hosts Using “Bump-in-the-API” (BIA), RFC 3338 (October 2002)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Choi, H.H., Cho, D.H.: Mobility management based on mobile IP in mixed IPv4/IPv6 networks. In: IEEE 58th Proceedings of VTC 2003-Fall, pp. 2048–2052 (October 2003)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gnana Jayanthi, J., Rabara, S.A.: IMM-I46: Inter Mobility Management for an Integrated IPv4 and IPv6 Network. In: Das, V.V., Vijayakumar, R., Debnath, N.C., Stephen, J., Meghanathan, N., Sankaranarayanan, S., Thankachan, P.M., Gaol, F.L., Thankachan, N. (eds.) BAIP 2010. CCIS, vol. 70, pp. 17–21. Springer, Heidelberg (2010) ISBN: 978-3-642-12213-2,Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gnana Jayanthi, J., Albert Rabara, S.: IPv6 Addressing Architecture in IPv4 Network. In: IEEE Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Communication Software and Networks (ICCSN 2010), Singapore, pp. 461–465 (2010) ISBN: 978-0-7695-3961-4/10Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gnana Jayanthi, J., Albert Rabara, S.: IPv4 Addressing Architecture in IPv6 Network. In: IEEE Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Advanced Computer Control (ICACC 2010), China, pp. 282–287 (2010) ISBN: 978-1-4244-5845-5Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept. of Computer ApplicationsJJ College of Engineering and TechnologyTiruchirappalliIndia
  2. 2.Dept. of Computer ScienceSt. Joseph’s CollegeTiruchirappalliIndia

Personalised recommendations