Assortment of Information from Mobile Phone Subscribers Using Chronological Model [IGCM]: Application and Management Perspective

Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (volume 167)


In this study, proposed Information Gathering Chronological Model (IGCM) design offers a large-scale questionnaire, i.e. a good reference for evaluating the prevalence of symptoms and sensations from the usage of mobile phones or wireless devices. The IGCM was applied to assess the possible health effects from mobile phones on population. The study was carried out as a survey by posting the questionnaire both the online and manual among the randomly selected 307 Indians. Mobile subscribers were assessed for self reported symptoms and sensations and safety management adopted during calling. A good number of mobile phone users were found to be associated with symptoms i.e., headache, ringing delusion, forgetfulness, increase in the carelessness, dizziness, extreme irritation, speaking falteringly, neurophysiologic discomfort, cell phone side ear temperature increase and speaking falteringly when analyzed the output of IGCM. Study concluded that proposed model IGCM has significance in order to monitoring and evaluating frequently available holistic information especially health care management by mobile phone subscribers.


Information Gathering Chronological Model (IGCM) Mobile Phone Wireless Communication Symptoms 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Seitz, H., Stinner, D., Eikmann, T., Herr, C., Röösli, M.: Electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) and subjective health complaints associated with electromagnetic fields of mobile phone communication-a literature review published between 2000 and 2004. Science of The Total Environment 349, 45–55 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. Health Phys. 74, 494–522 (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rubin, G.J., Das Munshi, J., Wessely, S.: Electromagnetic hypersensitivity: a systematic review of provocation studies. Psychosom Med. 67, 224–232 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hietanen, M., Hamalainen, A.M., Husman, T.: Hypersensitivity symptoms associated with exposure to cellular telephones: no causal link. Bioelectromagnetics 23, 264–270 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Roosli, M.: Radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure and non-specific symptoms of ill health: a systematic review. Environ. Res. 107, 277–287 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hillert, L., Berglind, N., Arnetz, B.B., Bellander, T.: Prevalence of self-reported hypersensitivity to electric or magnetic fields in a population-based questionnaire survey. Scand J. Work Environ. Health 28, 33–41 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Levallois, P., Neutra, R., Lee, G., Hristova, L.: Study of self-reported hypersensitivity to electromagnetic fields in California. Environ. Health Perspect 110 (suppl. 4), 619–623 (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schreier, N., Huss, A., Roosli, M.: The prevalence of symptoms attributed to electromagnetic field exposure: a cross-sectional representative survey in Switzerland. Soz. Praventivmed. 51, 202–209 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lahkola, A., Salminen, T., Raitanen, J., Heinavaara, S., Schoemaker, M.J., Christensen, H.C., Feychting, M., Johansen, C., Klaeboe, L., Lonn, S., Swerdlow, A.J., Tynes, T., Auvinen, A.: Meningioma and mobile phone use–a collaborative case-control study in five North European countries. Int. J. Epidemiol. 37, 1304–1313 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hardell, L., Carlberg, M., Mild, K.H.: Case-control study of the association between the use of cellular and cordless telephones and malignant brain tumors diagnosed during 2000-2003. Environ. Res. 100, 232–241 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Meo, S.A., Al-Drees, A.M.: Mobile phone related-hazards and subjective hearing and vision symptoms in the Saudi population. Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health 18, 53–57 (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Santini, R., Santini, P., Danze, J.M., Le Ruz, P., Seigne, M.: Symptoms experienced by people in vicinity of base stations: II/ Incidences of age, duration of exposure, location of subjects in relation to the antennas and other electromagnetic factors. Pathol. Biol. (Paris) 51, 412–415 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Issues in spectrum allocation and pricing in India (2002)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    February report of Telecommunication Regulatory Authority of India Press Release No.29 /2011 (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Balikci, K., Cem Ozcan, I., Turgut-Balik, D., Balik, H.H.: A survey study on some neurological symptoms and sensations experienced by long term users of mobile phones. Pathol. Biol.(Paris) 53, 30–34 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chia, S.E., Chia, H.P., Tan, J.S.: Prevalence of headache among handheld cellular telephone users in Singapore: a community study. Environ. Health Perspect 108, 1059–1062 (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information Technology, School for Information Science and TechnologyBabasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University (A Central University)LucknowIndia

Personalised recommendations