Abstract
For many observers neither EU-democracy nor e-democracy exist in any meaningful sense. With regard to the latter this is certainly the case, though this does not mean that we are not witnessing innovative experimentation with information and communication technologies (ICT) in the democratic realm. This chapter focuses on the prospects for e-democratic experimentation in the EU political setting. Drawing on normative democratic theory we look at four dimensions of e-democratic innovation: ICT techniques aimed at improving mechanisms of (1) representation, (2) participation and (3) deliberation and (4) opening new channels of contestation. The aim of the chapter is to survey some recent e-democratic innovations within the framework of these four broader normative visions and, in doing so, investigate the potential impact of ICT driven innovation on EU democratisation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
See Dutch Evaluation Report on 2004 elections. Experiment with Internet and telephone voting for voters abroad. Dutch Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom. Available at: www.minbzk.nl/aspx/download.aspx?file=/contents/pages/10764/041110evaluatierapportexpinternetenteldefversie_eng3.pdf
- 2.
See the Estonian Electoral Commission website: http://vvk.ee/ep09/index.php?id=11195
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
See welcome page of the ESF at: http://www.fse-esf.org
References
Alvarez, M. R., Hall, T., & Trechsel, A. (2009). Internet voting in comparative perspective. Political Science and Politics, 42(3), 497–505.
Auer, A., & Mendez, M. (2005). E-voting, E-democracy and EU-democracy: A thought experiment. In A. Trechsel & F. Mendez (Eds.), Introducing e-voting for the European parliament elections. London: Routledge.
Barber, B. R. (1998). Three scenarios for the future of technology and strong democracy. Political Science Quarterly, 113(4), 573–589.
Barber, B. R. (2004). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Carpini, D., Michael, X., Cook, F. L., & Jacobs, L. R. (2004). Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature. Annual Review of Political Science, 7, 315–344.
Cedroni, L., & Garzia, D. (2010). Voting advice applications in Europe: The state of the art. Napoli: Scriptaweb.
Dahl, R. (1989). Democracy and its critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dahlberg, L. (2007). Rethinking the fragmentation of the cyberpublic: From consensus to contestation. New Media Society, 9(5), 827–847.
della Porta, D., & Mosca, L. (2005). Global-Net for global movements? A network of networks for a movement of movements. Journal of Public Policy, 25(01), 165–190.
Drechsler, W., & Madise, U. (2004). Electronic voting in Estonia. In N. Kersting & H. Baldersheim (Eds.), Electronic voting and democracy. New York: Palgrave.
Fishkin, J. S. (1991). Democracy and deliberation: New directions for democratic reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Follesdal, A., & Hix, S. (2006). Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU: A response to Majone and Moravcsik. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(3), 533–562.
Fung, A. (2007). Democratic theory and political science: A pragmatic method of constructive engagement. American Political Science Review, 101(03), 443–458.
Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Kies, R., Leyenaar, M., & Niemoller, K. (forthcoming). European Citizens Consulation: A large consultation on a vague concept. European citizens’ deliberation: A promising path for EU governance? Abingdon, Oxon: Ashgate.
Kies, R., Mendez, F., Schmitter, P., & Trechsel, A. (2004). Evaluation of the use of new technologies in order to facilitate democracy in Europe: E-democratizing the parliaments and parties in Europe. Luxembourg: STOA. European Parliament.
Mair, P. (2007). Political opposition and the European Union. Government and Opposition, 42(1), 1–17.
Marks, G., & Steenbergen, M. (Eds.). (2004). European integration and political conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mendez, F. (2010). Elections and the internet: On the difficulties of ‘upgrading’ elections in the digital era. Representation, 46(4), 459–469.
Moravcsik, A. (2008). The myth of Europe’s ‘democratic deficit’. Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, 43(6), 331–340.
Mouffe, C. (2000). The democratic paradox. London: Verso Books.
Mundo, Y. (forthcoming). Europe’s new communication policy and the introduction of transnational deliberative citizens’ involvement projects. In European citizens’ deliberation: A promising path for EU governance? Abingdon, Oxon: Ashgate.
Norris, P. (2005). E-voting as the magic bullet for European parliamentary elections? In A. Trechsel & F. Mendez (Eds.), The European Union and e-voting: addressing the European Parliament’s internet voting challenge. London: Routledge.
Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pettit, P. (2000). Democracy, electoral and contestatory. In S. Ian & M. Stephen (Eds.), Designing democratic institutions. New York: Nomos, NYU Press.
Pianta, M. (2012). European alternatives: Trajectories of mobilisations responding to Europe’s crisis. Open Democracy retrieved (www.opendemocracy.net).
Pieters, W., & van Haren, R. (2007). Temptations of turnout and modernisation: E-voting discourses in the UK and The Netherlands. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 5(4), 276–292.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Schmitter, P. C. (2005). E-voting, E-democracy and EU-democracy: A thought experiment. In A. Trechsel & F. Mendez (Eds.), The European Union and e-voting: addressing the European Parliament’s internet voting challenge. London: Routledge.
Searle, J. (1995). The construction of social reality. London: Penguin.
Trechsel, A. H., & Mair, P. (2011). When parties (also) position themselves: An introduction to the EU profiler. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 8(1), 1–20.
van den Hoven, J. (2005). E-democracy, E-contestation and the monitorial citizen. Ethics and Information Technology, 7(2), 51–59.
Wright, S. (2007). A virtual European public sphere? The futurum discussion forum. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(8), 1167–1185.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Annex
Annex
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mendez, F. (2013). EU Democracy and E-Democracy: Can the Two Be Reconciled?. In: Demetriou, K. (eds) Democracy in Transition. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30068-4_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30068-4_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30067-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30068-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)