The Impact of Socio-economic Status on Political Participation

Chapter

Abstract

This paper explores the relationship between political participation on the one hand and parental/adolescent socio-economic status on the other hand. We analyzed this research question using the Belgian Political Panel Survey 2006–2008, a representative panel study among 4,235 young Belgian adolescents (aged 16 at time-point 1). The structural equation model reveals that young people’s socio-economic status has more influence on political participation than the parental socio-economic status. Adolescents’ socio-economic status does not only affect the level of political participation at the time of measurement itself, but also two years later. This indicates that higher educated or in higher tracks, people are not only more likely to participate, but also more likely to participate in the future: the gap between the activists and non-activists even grows over time.

Keywords

Occupational Status Political Participation Educational Goal Educational Track High Educational Degree 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1965). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations (2nd ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alwin, D. F., Cohen, R. L., & Newcomb, T. M. (1992). Political attitudes over the life span. The Bennington women after fifty years. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  3. Beck, P. A., & Jennings, M. K. (1982). Pathways to participation. American Political Science Review, 76(1), 94–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berelson, B. N., Lazarsfeld, P. F., & MacPhee, W. N. (1963). Voting: A study of opinion formation in a presidential campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Coleman, J., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., & York, R. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: US Department of Health, Education and Welfare.Google Scholar
  8. Dahl, R. A. (2006). On political equality. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dalton, R. (1980). Reassessing parental socialization: Indicator unreliability versus generational transfer. American Political Science Review, 74(2), 421–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fridkin, K. L., Kenney, P. J., & Crittenden, J. (2006). On the margins of democratic life: The impact of race and ethnicity on the political engagement of young people. American Politics Research, 34(5), 605–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gimpel, J. G., Lay, C. J., & Schuknecht, J. E. (2003). Cultivating democracy. Civic environments and political socialization in America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hirtt, N., Nicaise, I., & De Zutter, D. (2007). De School van de Ongelijkheid. Berchem: Epo.Google Scholar
  13. Hooghe, M., & Quintelier, E. (2012). Political participation in Europe. In O. W. Gabriel & S. I. Keil (Eds.), Society and democracy in Europe.Google Scholar
  14. Jennings, M. K., & Niemi, R. G. (1981). Generations and politics: A panel study of young adults and their parents. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Kerr, D., Cleaver, E., Ireland, E., & Blenkinsop, S. (2003). Citizenship education longitudinal study first cross-sectional survey 2001–2002. Norwich: National Foundation for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  16. Lane, R. E. (1959). Political life: Why and how people get involved in politics. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
  17. Lipset, S. M. (1963). Political man. The social bases of politics. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  18. Milbrath, L. W. (1965). Political participation. How and why do people get involved in politics? Chicago: Rand McNally and Company.Google Scholar
  19. Nie, N. H., Junn, J., & Stehlik-Barry, K. (1996). Education and democratic citizenship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  20. Norris, P. (2006). Political protest in fragile states. Paper presented at the International Political Science Association World Congress in Fukuoka (Japan), Thursday, 1 July 2006.Google Scholar
  21. Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track. How schools structure inequality. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Parry, G., Moyser, G., & Day, N. (1992). Political participation and democracy in Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Plutzer, E. (2002). Becoming a habitual voter: Inertia, resources, and growth in young adulthood. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Quintelier, E. (2009). The political participation of immigrant youth in Belgium. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 35(6), 919–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rosenstone, S. J., & Hansen, J. M. (2003[1993]). Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  26. Rumberger, R. W. (2004). Multilevel models for school effectiveness research. In G. J. Palardy & D. Kaplan (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 235–258). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Schlozman, K. L., Verba, S., & Brady, H. E. (2012). The unheavenly chorus. Unequal political voice and the broken promise of American democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Taris, T. W. (2000). A primer in longitudinal data analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Torney-Purta, J., & Stapleton, L. (2002). Predictors of civic knowledge and engagement: A structural equation model using home background and school factors in the United States, England and Sweden. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Conference, New Orleans, 4 Apr 2002.Google Scholar
  30. Torney-Purta, J., Schwille, J., & Amadeo, J. (1999). Civic education across countries: Twenty-four national case studies from the IEA Civic Education Project. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.Google Scholar
  31. Torney-Purta, J., Lehmann, R., Oswald, H., & Schulz, W. (2001). Citizenship and education in twenty-eight countries: Civic knowledge and engagement at age fourteen. Amsterdam: IEA.Google Scholar
  32. Verba, S., & Nie, N. (1972). Participation in America. Political democracy and social equality. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., Brady, H., & Nie, N. H. (1993). Race ethnicity and political resources: Participation in the United States. British Journal of Political Science, 23(4), 453–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Wattenberg, M. P. (2007). Is voting for young people? With a postscript on citizen engagement. New York: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
  36. Woessmann, L. (2004). The effect heterogeneity of central exams: Evidence from TIMSS, TIMSS-Repeat and PISA. Munich, CESIFO Working Paper, No. 1330.Google Scholar
  37. Wolfinger, R. E., & Rosenstone, S. J. (1980). Who votes? New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Leuven (Belgium)LeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations