Advertisement

Political Engagement Among the Youth: Effects of Political Socialization Across Europe

  • Steve Schwarzer
  • Dylan Connor
Chapter

Abstract

In Western Europe the debate on (young) people’s engagement with conventional politics is on-going. The conditions under which some people become more involved with politics are a puzzle, since pioneer works on political culture detected differences among individuals in this respect. This paper aims to test several factors of socialization on civic engagement and political participation for 13 and 14 year old students. We focus on political socialization patterns that foster students’ political engagement, which could be seen as a starting point for political participation. To achieve this, the chapter explores political engagement of youngsters (13–14 years old) across Europe. This multilevel analysis uses data from the ICC study, which took place between 2007 and 2009. The analysis will focus on both within, and between country differences in explaining levels of political engagement and several of its agents. Furthermore, the analysis will show that parents play a vital role in the very narrow setting of an individual. On the other hand schools have the potential to reach a large proportion of young people, which could help to equilibrate the effect of missing first stage socialization and develop a positive impact on young people’s political engagement and further political participation.

Keywords

Political Participation Civic Engagement Political Discussion Opportunity Structure Random Slope 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1989). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Newbury Park: SAGE.Google Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  4. Benzécri, J. P. (1992). Correspondence analysis handbook. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
  5. Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1967). Die Gesellschaftliche Konstruktion der Wirklichkeit. Eine Theorie der Wissenssoziologie. Frankfurt a. M.: Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar
  6. Campbell, D. E. (2008). Voice in the classroom: How an open classroom climate fosters political engagement among adolescents. Political Behaviour, 30, 437–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dalton, R. (2006). Citizen politics: Public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies. Washington: Chatham House.Google Scholar
  8. Dalton, R. (2008). Citizenship norms and the expansion of political participation. Political Studies, 56, 76–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dawson, R. E., & Prewitt, K. (1969). Political socialization. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  10. Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  11. EUYOUPART (2005). EUYOUPART deliverable 17: Final comparative report. Political participation of young people in Europe – Development of indicators for comparative research in the European Union (EUYOUPART), Forschungsprojekt im Rahmen des 5. Rahmenprogramms, Vertragsnummer HPSE-CT-2002-00123. Vienna, SORA.Google Scholar
  12. Franklin, M. N. (2004). Voter turnout and the dynamics of electoral competition in established democracies since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Galston, W. A. (2003). Civic education and political participation. Phi Delta Kappan, 85(1), 29–33.Google Scholar
  14. Greenacre, M. J. (1984). Theory and applications of correspondence analysis. London: Academic.Google Scholar
  15. Greenacre, M. J. (2007). Correspondence analysis in practice. Boca Raton/London: Chapman & Hall/CRC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Held, D. (1996). Models of democracy. Standford: Standford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hooghe, M. (2004). Political socialization and the future of politics. Acta Politica. International Journal of Political Science, 39(4), 331–341.Google Scholar
  18. Hyman, H. (1959). Political socialization. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
  19. James, A., & James, A. L. (2004). Constructing childhood. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Jones, K. V., & Subramanian, S. (2012). Developing multilevel models for analysing contextuality, heterogeneity and change using MLwiN 2.2: Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol.Google Scholar
  21. Langton, K., & Jennings, K. M. (1968). Political socialization and the high school civics curriculum in the United States. American Political Science Review, 62, 862–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Markus, G. B. (1979). The political environment and the dynamics of public attitudes. A panel study. American Journal of Political Science, 42(2), 461–487.Google Scholar
  23. McIntosh, H., & Youniss, J. (2010). Toward a political theory of political socialization of youth. In L. R. Sherrod, J. Torney-Purta, & C. A. Flanagan (Eds.), Handbook of research on civic engagement in youth. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  24. Meulman, J. J., van der Kooij, A., et al. (2004). Principal components analysis with nonlinear optimal scaling transformations for ordinal and nominal data. In D. Kaplan & S. P. inc. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (p. 511). Thousand Oaks: Sage: xiii.Google Scholar
  25. Mondak, J. J., & Halperin, K. (2008). A framework for the study of personality and political behaviour. British Journal of Political Science, 38, 335–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nie, N., Junn, J., et al. (1996). Education and democratic citizenship in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  27. Niemi, R. G., & Junn, J. (1998). Civic education: What makes students learn? New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Norris, P. (2000). A virtuous circle: Political communication in postindustrial societies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Panagiotakos, D. B., & Pitsavos, C. (2004). Interpretation of epidemiological data using multiple correspondence analysis and log-linear models. Journal of Data Science, 2, 75–86.Google Scholar
  30. Rasbash, J., Browne, W., et al. (2000). A user's guide to MLwiN. London: Center for Multilevel Modelling - University of London Institute of Education.Google Scholar
  31. Sapiro, V. (2004). Not your parents’ political socialization: Introduction for a new generation. Annual Reviews, 7, 24.Google Scholar
  32. Scherr, A. (2008). Sozialisation, person, individuum. In B. Schäfers (Ed.), Einführung in Hauptbegriffe der Soziologie (pp. 45–68). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaft.Google Scholar
  33. Schwarzer, S., & Zeglovits, E. (2012, forthcoming). “If you don’t come across it in your family or in school, where else?” – How 16-and 17-year old Austrian first time voters perceive the role of schools in preparing them for the election. In S. Abendschoen (Ed.), New directions of political socialization research: Old and new challenges. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
  34. Searing, D., Schwartz, J., et al. (1973). The structuring principle: Political socialisation and belief systems. American Political Science Review, 67(2), 415–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tedin, K. L. (1980). Assessing peer and parental influences on political attitudes. American Journal of Political Science, 24, 13–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Torney-Purta, J. (2002a). The school’s role in developing civic engagement: A study of adolescents in twenty-eight countries. Applied Development Science, 6(4), 203–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Torney-Purta, J. (2002b). What adolescents know about citizenship and democracy. Educational Leadership, 59(4), 45–50.Google Scholar
  38. Torney-Purta, J., Wilkenfeld, B., et al. (2008). How adolescents in twenty-seven countries understand, support, and practice human rights. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 857–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., et al. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Wagner, M., Johann, D., et al. (2012, forthcoming). “Voting at 16: Turnout and the quality of vote choice.” Electoral Studies.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Marie Curie Training Network Elecdem, TNS opinionBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations