Political Participation and Non-democratic Political Culture in Western Europe, East-Central Europe and Post-Yugoslav Countries

Chapter

Abstract

Theory of postmodernization (Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton/Chichester: Princeton University Press; Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2007). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. New York: Cambridge University Press) predicts that the public in socioeconomically more developed countries (e.g. established democracies) are more politically engaged and more pro-democratically oriented (e.g. higher levels of self-expression values) than citizens in less prosperous (e.g. post-communist) countries; and that individuals who are more non-democratically oriented are generally less political active. We tested these predictions by comparing three European regions: a group of twenty established European democracies, nine Central and Eastern European EU member states, and seven post-Yugoslav countries. The predictive power of postmodernization theory within the post-Yugoslav sample was also examined. Employing European Values Study (European Values Study. (2008) http://zacat.gesis.org. Accessed 27 Mar 2011) we cross-regionally and cross-nationally compared (1) the levels of three types of political participation (voter turnout, party membership, and protest participation); (2) the levels of non-democratic political culture (authoritarian political culture, lifestyle intolerance, and gender role traditionalism), and (3) the link between political participation and non-democratic political culture. The results indicated that post-communist citizens are less politically engaged and more non-democratically oriented than their Western counterparts, and that in all three regions “authoritarians” are less likely to be political active. A less straightforward pattern was observed in post-Yugoslav countries. Implications of the results and future research suggestions are discussed.

Keywords

Political Participation Political Culture Socioeconomic Development Gender Role Traditionalism Voter Turnout 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abramson, P. R., & Aldrich, J. H. (1982). Decline of electoral participation in America. American Political Science Review, 76, 502–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adam, F. (2008). Mapping social capital across Europe: Findings, trends and methodological shortcomings of cross-national surveys. Social Science Information, 47(2), 159–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adam, F., Makarovič, M., Rončević, B., & Tomšič, M. (2005). The challenges of sustained development: The role of socio-cultural factors in East-Central Europe. New York/Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Alesina, A. (2002). Fractionalization. Discussion Paper Number 1959. HIER Harvard Institute of Economic Research. Cambridge: Harvard UniversityGoogle Scholar
  5. Almond, G. A. (1983). Communism and political culture theory. Comparative Politics, 15(2), 127–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Barber, B. R. (1984). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  8. Barbič, A. (1973). Citzen participation in four Yugoslav republics. Participation and self-management, (Zagreb), 6: 23–36.Google Scholar
  9. Barnes, B. (1998). The mobilization of political identity in new democracies. In S. H. Barnes & J. Simon (Eds.), The postcommunist citizen (pp. 117–138). Hungary: The Erasmus Foundation.Google Scholar
  10. Barnes, S. H. (2004). Political participation in post-communist Central and Eastern Europe. Center for the Study of Democracy, Paper 04′10. http://repositories.cdlib.org/csd/04-10. Accessed 10 Nov 2007.
  11. Barnes, S. H. (2006). The changing political participation of postcommunist citizens. International Journal of Sociology, 36(2), 76–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Barnes, S., & Simon, H. J. (Eds.). (1998). The postcommunist citizen. Budapest: Erasmus Foundation.Google Scholar
  13. Barnes, S. H., Kaase, M., et al. (1979). Political action: An eight nation study. Ann Arbor: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social research.Google Scholar
  14. Bashkirova, E. (2002). Political participation in Central and Eastern Europe. Results of the 1999 European values surveys. In D. Fuchs et al. (Eds.), Burger und Demokratie in Ost und West (pp. 319–322). Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  15. Bernhagen, P., & Marsh, M. (2007). Voting and protesting: Explaining citizen participation in old and new European Democracies. Democratization, 14(1), 44–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bertsch, G. K., & Zaninovich, G. M. (1974). A factor-analytic method of identifying different political cultures: The multinational Yugoslav case. Comparative Politics, 6(2), 219–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Blais, A. (2007). Turnout in elections. In R. Dalton & H.-D. Klingemann (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political behavior (pp. 621–635). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brajdić-Vuković, M., Birkelund, E., & Štulhofer, A. S. (2007). Between tradition and modernization: Attitudes toward women’s employment and gender roles in Croatia. International Journal of Sociology, 37(3), 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bratton, M. (1999). Political participation in a new democracy: Institutional considerations from Zambia. Comparative Political Studies, 32(5), 549–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Claggett, W., & Pollock, P. H. (2006). The modes of participation revisited, 1980–2004. Political Research Quarterly, 59, 593–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Crozier, N., Huntington, S. P., & Watnuki, J. (1975). The crisis of democracy: Report on the governability of democracies to the Trilateral Commission. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Dahl, R. A. (1972). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Dalton, R. J. (1996). Democracy and its citizens: Patterns of political change. Center for the Study of Democracy (University of California, Irvine). http://escholarship.org/uc/item/9pn25985. Accessed 21 Mar 2010.
  24. Dalton, R. J. (2000). Citizen attitudes and political behavior. Comparative Political Studies, 33(67), 912–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dalton, R. J. (2008a). Citizen politics: Public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
  26. Dalton, R. J. (2008b). The good citizen: How a younger generation is reshaping American politics. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
  27. Dalton, R. J., & van Sickle, A. (2005). The resource, structural, and cultural bases of Protest Center for the Study of Democracy (University of California, Irvine). http://escholarship.org/uc/item/3jx2b911. Accessed 21 Mar 2010.
  28. Davidson-Schmich, L. K. (2006). Searching for the Origins of civic community in Central Europe: Evidence from Eastern and Western Germany. Democratization, 13(1), 95–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Diamond, L. (Ed.). (1994). Political culture and democracy in developing countries: Textbook edition. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  30. Dubrow, J. K., Slomczynski, K. M., & Tomescu-Dubrow, I. (2008). Effects of democracy and inequality on soft political-protest in Europe: Exploring the European Social Survey Data. International Journal of Sociology, 38(3), 36–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Duch, R. (1998). Participation in new democracies of central and Eastern Europe: Cultural versus rational choice explanations. In S. H. Barnes & J. Simon (Eds.), The postcommunist citizen (pp. 195–228). Budapest: Erasmus Foundation.Google Scholar
  32. Easton, D. (1975). A re-assessment of the concept of political support. British Journal of Political Science, 5, 435–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. European Values Study (2008). European values study. http://zacat.gesis.org. Accessed 27 Mar 2011.
  34. Fink-Hafner, D., & Kropivnik, S. (2006). Politična udeležba v posocializmu: med deformirano modernostjo, novo modernizacijo in postmodernostjo. Družboslovne razprave, 22(51), 55–72.Google Scholar
  35. Flanagan, S. C., & Lee, A.-R. (2003). The new politics, culture wars, and the authoritarian-libertarian value change in advanced industrial democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 36(3), 235–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Flere, S., & Kirbiš, A. (2009a). New age, religiosity, and traditionalism: A cross-cultural comparison: Comment on Houtman and Auspers, JSSR, September 2007. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 48(1), 161–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Flere, S., & Kirbiš, A. (2009b). New age is not inimical to religion and traditionalism: Rebuttal. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 48(1), 179–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Flere, S., & Molnar, A. (1992). Avtoritarizem, etnocentrizem in retradicionalizacija. Družboslovne razprave, 9(13), 5–14.Google Scholar
  39. Freedom House. (2011). Freedom in the world, aggregate and subcategory scores. http://www.freedomhouse.org/images/File/fiw/historical/AggregateScores_FIW2003-2011.xls. Accessed 6 Mar 2011.
  40. Frieze, I. H., et al. (2003). Gender-role attitudes in university students in the United States, Slovenia, and Croatia. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 256–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gabriel, O. W. (2004). Political efficacy and trust. In J. W. van Deth & E. Scarbrough (Eds.), The impact of values (pp. 357–390). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Gabriel, O. W., & van Deth, J. W. (2004). Political interest. In J. W. van Deth & E. Scarbrough (Eds.), The impact of values (pp. 390–411). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Galić, B. (2000). Politička kultura “novih demokracija”. Revija za sociologiju, 31(3/4), 197–209.Google Scholar
  44. Gow, J. (2009). The war in Kosovo, 1998–99. In C. Ingrao & T. A. Emmert (Eds.), Confronting the Yugoslav contoversies. A scholars’ initiative (pp. 302–345). West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Gray, M., & Caul, M. (2000). Declining voter turnout in advanced industrial democracies, 1950 to 1997. The effects of declining group mobilization. Comparative Political Studies, 33, 1091–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Guérin, D., Petry, F., & Crête, J. (2004). Tolerance, protest and democratic transition: Survey evidence from 13 post-communist countries. European Journal of Political Research, 43, 371–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Gundelach, P. (2004). Grass-roots activity. In J. W. van Deth & E. Scarbrough (Eds.), The impact of values (pp. 412–440). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. HDR. (2010). Human development report 2010. 20th anniversary edition. The real wealth of nations: Pathways to human development. New York: United Nations Development Programme (UNDP).Google Scholar
  49. Hofstede, G. (1994). Images of Europe. The Netherlands Journal of Social Sciences, 30(1), 63–82.Google Scholar
  50. Holmberg, S. (1999). Down and down we go: Political trust in Sweden. In P. Norris (Ed.), Critical citizens: Global support for democratic government, 103–122. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Horowitz, S. (2003). Sources of post-communist democratization: Economic structure, political culture, war, and political institutions. Nationalities Papers, 31(2), 119–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton/Chichester: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Inglehart, R., & Catterberg, G. (2002). Trends in political action: The developmental trend and the post-honeymoon decline. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 43, 300–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2007). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Inkeles, A., & Smith, D. H. (1974). Becoming modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Jambrek, P. (1988). Zveza komunitov in politične kulture Jugoslavije. V Stratifikacijske analize sodobnih družb, Slovensko sociološko srečanje 88, 140–164. Ljubljana: MC CK ZKS: Slovensko sociološko društvo.Google Scholar
  57. Janmaat, J. G. (2006). Civic culture in Western and Eastern Europe. European Journal of Sociology, 47, 363–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kaase, M., & Marsh, A. (1979). Political action. A theoretical perspective. In S. Barnes, M. Kaase, et al. (Eds.), Political action: Mass participation in five Western democracies (pp. 27–56). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  59. Kaase, M., & Newton, K. (1995). Beliefs in government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Katz, R. S., et al. (1992). The membership of political parties in European democracies, 1960–1990. European Journal of Political Research, 22, 329–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kirbiš, A. (2010). Political inequality and social structure: A comparative study of political voice among students in Post-Yugoslav societies. Paper presented at XVII ISA World Congress of Sociology Sociology on the Move, Gothenburg, 11–17 July 2010.Google Scholar
  62. Kirbiš, A. (2011). Political culture of post-Yugoslav countries: Structure, determinants and consequences: Doctoral Dissertation [Politična kultura postkomunističnih držav nekdanje Jugoslavije: struktura, dejavniki in posledice: doktorska disertacija]. Maribor: Filozofska fakultetaGoogle Scholar
  63. Kirbiš, A., & Flere, S. (2010). Youth citizen engagement in post-communist societies: The case of Post-Yugoslav entities. Paper presented at XVII ISA World Congress of Sociology, Sociology on the Move, Gothenburg, 11–17 July 2010.Google Scholar
  64. Kirbiš, A., & Flere, S. (2011a). Državljanska participacija: primerjalna analiza postjugoslovanskih entitet [Citizen participation: Comparative study of post-Yugoslav entities]. Teorija in praksa, 48(2), 350–375.Google Scholar
  65. Kirbiš, A., & Flere, S. (2011b). Podložniška politična kultura v postkomunističnih družbah: primerjalna študija postjugoslovanskih študentov [Subject political culture in post-communist societies: a comparative study of post-Yugoslav students]. Družboslovne razprave, 27(66), 45–66.Google Scholar
  66. Kirbiš, A., and Flere, S. (2011c). Participacija. In M. Lavrič (Ed.): Mladina 2010: družbeni profil mladih v Sloveniji, 177–247. Ljubljana: Ministrstvo za šolstvo in šport, Urad RS za mladino; Maribor: Aristej.Google Scholar
  67. Klanjšek, R. (2007). Social dynamic in Times of Globalization – Values in Some Societies of East and South-East Europe: Doctoral Thesis [Družbena dinamika v času globalizacije - vrednote v nekaterih družbah Vzhodne in Jugovzhodne Evrope: doktorska disertacija]. Maribor: Filozofska fakultetaGoogle Scholar
  68. Klingemann, H.-D., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, S., & Zielonka, J. (2006). Introduction: Support for democracy and autocracy in Eastern Europe. In H.-D. Klingemann, D. Fuchs, & J. Zielonka (Eds.), Democracy and political culture in Eastern Europe (pp. 1–22). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  69. Kluegel, J., & Mason, D. S. (1999). Political involvement in transition: Who participated in Central and Eastern Europe? International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 40(1), 41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Kostadinova, T. (2003). Voter turnout dynamics in post-communist Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 42(6), 741–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Kuzmanović, B. (1990). Socijalni i politički aktivizam omladine. In S. Mihailović et al. (Eds.): Deca krize: Omladina Jugoslavije krajem osamdesetih, 76–106. Beograd: Institut društvenih nauka, Centar za politikološka istraživanja i javno mnenje.Google Scholar
  72. Lavrič, M. (2007). Dimenzionalnost in družbena ter osebnostna pogojenost religioznosti v petih kulturnih okoljih: doktorska disertacija. Maribor: Filozofska fakultetaGoogle Scholar
  73. Lavrič, M. (Ed.). (2011). Youth 2010: The social profile of young people in Slovenia. Ljubljana: Ministry of Education and sports, Office for youth. Maribor: Aristej.Google Scholar
  74. Lerner, D. (1958). The passing of traditional society: Modernizing the middle East. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  75. Lewis, P. (1997). Political participation in postcommunist democracies. In D. Potter (Ed.), Democratization (pp. 443–465). Cambridge: Polity Press, Milton Keynes: Open University.Google Scholar
  76. Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 53, 69–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Listhaug, O., & Wiberg, M. (1995). Confidence in political and private institutions. In H.-D. Klingemann & D. Fuchs (Eds.), Citizens and the state (pp. 298–322). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  78. Macedo, S., Alex-Assensoh, Y., & Berry, J. (2005). Democracy at risk: How political choices undermine citizen participation and what we can do about it. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  79. Makarovič, M. (2002). Politična participacija v desetletju demokratizacije. In N. Toš, and I. Bernik (Eds.): Demokracija v Sloveniji, 65–87. Ljubljana: FDV, IDV, Center za raziskovanje javnega mnenja in množičnih komunikacij.Google Scholar
  80. Markowski, R. (2002). Political institutions and electoral behavior in Central and Eastern Europe. In D. Fuchs, E. Roller, & B. Wessels (Eds.), Bürger und Demokratie in Ost und West – Studien zur politischen Kultur und zum politischen Prozess. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  81. Mason, D. S. (1995). Attitudes toward the market and political participation in the postcommunist states. Slavic Review, 54(2), 385–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. McAllister, I., & White, S. (2009). Conventional citizen participation. In C. W. Haerpfer, P. Bernhagen, R. Inglehart, & C. Welzel (Eds.), Democratization (pp. 186–200). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Mihailović, S. (1986). Odnos omladine prema politici. In S. Vrcan (Ed.): Položaj, svest i ponašanje mlade generacije Jugoslavije: preliminarna analiza rezultata istraživanja, 169–186. Beograd: Centar za istraživačku, dokumentacionu i istraživačku delatnost predsedništva.Google Scholar
  84. Miheljak, V. (2006). Slovenia in Central Europe: Merely meteorological or a value kinship? In H.-D. Klingemann, D. Fuchs, & J. Zielonka (Eds.), Democracy and political culture in Eastern Europe (pp. 119–147). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  85. Miljević, M., & Poplašen, N. (1991). Politička kultura in međunacionalni odnosi. In L. Baćević et al. (Eds.): Jugoslavija na kriznoj prekretnici, 77–96. Beograd: Institut društvenih nauka, Centar za politikološka istraživanja i javno mnenje.Google Scholar
  86. Nelson, D. (1996). Civil society endangered. Social Research, 63(2), 345–369.Google Scholar
  87. Newton, K., Montero, J.-R., et al. (2007). Patterns of political and social participation in Europe. In R. Jowell (Ed.), Measuring attitudes cross-nationally: Lessons from the European Social Survey (pp. 205–238). Los Angeles [etc.]: Sage.Google Scholar
  88. Niculescu, C. (2003). The changing status of protest participation. Romanian Journal of Political Science, 3(1), 122–147.Google Scholar
  89. Norris, P. (2002). Democratic phoenix: Reinventing political activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Pacek, A. C., Pop-Eleches, G., & Tucker, J. A. (2009). Disenchanted or discerning: Voter turnout in postc-communist countries. The Journal of Politics, 71(2), 473–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Pantić, D. (1988). Politička kultura i članstvo SKJ. In V. Falatov, B. Milošević, and R. Nešković (Eds.): Tito – partija, 489–509. Beograd: Memorijalni centar “Josip Broz Tito”: Narodna knjiga.Google Scholar
  92. Pantić, D. (1998). Politička kultura i vrednosti. In D. Pantić (Ed.): Fragmenti političke kulture, 38–79. Beograd: Institut društvenih nauka, Centar za politološka istraživanja i javno mnenje.Google Scholar
  93. Parry, G., & Moyser, G. (1994). More participation, more democracy? In D. Beetham (Ed.), Defining and measuring democracy (pp. 44–62). London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  94. Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  95. Plasser, F., & Pribersky, A. (Eds.). (1996). Political culture in East Central Europe. Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
  96. Pridham, G., & Lewis, P. G. (Eds.). (1996). Stabilising fragile democracies: Comparing new systems in southern and Eastern Europe. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  97. Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone. The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  99. Radin, F. (1986). Vrijednosti jugoslavenske omladine. In S. Vrcan (Ed.): Položaj, svest i ponašanje mlade generacije Jugoslavije: preliminarna analiza rezultata istraživanja: 55–75. Beograd: Centar za istraživačku, dokumentacionu i istraživačku delatnost predsedništva konferencije SSOJ.Google Scholar
  100. Rizman, R. (2006). Uncertain path: Democratic transition and consolidation in Slovenia. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar
  101. Roeder, P. G. (2001). Ethnolinguistic fractionalization (ELF) indices, 1961 and 1985. http://dss.ucsd.edu/~proeder/elf.xls. Accessed 3 June 2011.
  102. Roller, E., & Rudi, T. (2008). Explaining level and equality of political participation. The role of social capital, socioeconomic modernity, and political institutions. In H. Meulemann (Ed.), Social capital in Europe: Similarity of countries and diversity of people?: Multi-level analyses of the European social survey 2002 (pp. 251–284). Leiden/Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Rose, R., & Shin, D. C. (2001). Democratization backwards: The problem of third-wave democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 31, 331–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Rosenstone, S. J., & Hansen, J. M. (1993). Mobilization, participation and democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  105. Roßteutscher, S. (2008). Social capital and civic engagement: A comparative perspective. In D. Castiglione, J. W. van Deth, & G. Wolleb (Eds.), The handbook of social capital (pp. 208–240). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  106. Rus, V., & Toš, N. (2005). Vrednote Slovencev in Evropejcev: analiza vrednotnih orientacij Slovencev ob koncu stoletja. Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede, IDV, CJMMK.Google Scholar
  107. Sartori, G. (1987). The theory of democracy revisited (Vol. 2). Chatham: Chatham House Publishers.Google Scholar
  108. Scarrow, S. E. (2007). Political activism and party members. In R. Dalton & H.-D. Klingemann (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political behavior (pp. 636–654). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Schlozman, L. K. (2002). Citizen participation in America: What do we know? Why do we care? In I. Katznelson & H. V. Milner (Eds.), Political science: The state of the discipline (pp. 433–461). New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  110. Schmitt, H., & Holmberg, S. (1995). Political parties in decline? In H.-D. Klingemann & D. Fuchs (Eds.), Citizens and the state (pp. 95–133). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  111. Schumpeter, J. (1943/2003). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  112. Sekulić, D., & Šporer, Ž. (2006). Religioznost kao prediktor vrijednosnih orijentacija. Revija za sociologiju, 27(1–2), 1–19.Google Scholar
  113. Shin, D. C. (1999). Mass politics and culture in democratizing Korea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  114. Siemienska, R. (2002). Intergenerational differences in political values and attitudes in stable and new democracies. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 43(3–5), 386–390.Google Scholar
  115. Simkus, A. (2007). Cross-national differences in the Western Balkans in three dimensions of attitudes: Ethnic exclusionism, gender role conservatism, and conservative sexual mores. International Journal of Sociology, 37(3), 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Singh, S. (2001). Contradictory calculi: Differences in individuals’ turnout decisions across electoral systems. Political Research Quarterly, 64(3), 646–655.Google Scholar
  117. Sullivan, J. L., & Transue, J. E. (1999). The psychological underpinnings of democracy: A selective review of research on political tolerance, interpersonal trust, and social capital. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 625–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Teorell, J. (2006). Political participation and three theories of democracy: A research inventory and agenda. European Journal of Political Research, 45(5), 787–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Tesch-Romer, C., Motel-Klingebiel, A., & Tomasik, M. J. (2008). Gender differences in subjective well-being: Comparing societies with respect to gender equality. Social Indicators Research, 85(2), 329–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Thomassen, J., & van Deth, J. W. (1998). Political involvement and democratic attitudes. In S. H. Barnes & J. Simon (Eds.), The postcommunist citizen (pp. 139–164). Budapest: Erasmus Foundation.Google Scholar
  121. Torney-Purta, J., & Richardson, W. (2002). Trust in government and civic engagement among adolescents in Australia, England, Greece, Norway and the United States. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston Marriott Copley Place, Sheraton Boston & Hynes Convention Center, Boston, 28 Aug 2002.Google Scholar
  122. Ulram, P., & Plasser, F. (2001). Mainly sunny with scattered clouds: political culture in East-Central Europe. In G. Pridham & A. Ágh (Eds.), Prospects for democratic consolidation in East-Central Europe (pp. 115–137). Manchester/New York: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  123. van Deth, J. W. (2006). Democracy and involvement: The benevolent aspects of social participation. In M. Torcal & J. R. Montero (Eds.), Political disaffection in contemporary democracies. social capital, institutions, and politics (pp. 101–129). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  124. van Deth, J. W. (2008). Political involvement and social capital. In H. Meulemann (Ed.), Social capital in Europe: Similarity of countries and diversity of people? Multi-level analyses of the European Social Survey 2002 (pp. 191–218). Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
  125. van Deth, J., & Elff, M. (2004). Politicisation, economic development and political interest in Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 43(3), 477–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Vanhanen, T. (1990). The process of democratization: A comparative study of 147 states, 1980–88. New York/London: Crane Russak Group.Google Scholar
  127. Vasović, M. (1991a). Vrednosna opredeljenja Jugoslovena. In L. Baćević et al. (Eds.): Jugoslavija na kriznoj prekretnici: 116–166. Beograd: Institut društvenih nauka, Centar za politikološka istraživanja i javno mnenje.Google Scholar
  128. Vasović, M. (1991b). Dva pokazatelja vrednosnih opredeljenja građana. V L. Baćević et al. (Eds.): Jugoslavija na kriznoj prekretnici: 184–190. Beograd: Institut društvenih nauka, Centar za politikološka istraživanja i javno mnenje.Google Scholar
  129. Verba, S., & Nie, N. (1972). Participation in America. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  130. Verba, S., Nie, N. H., & Kim, J. (1978). Participation and political equality: A seven-nation comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  131. Verba, S., Schlozman, K., & Brady, H. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  132. Vrcan, S. (Ed.). (1986). Položaj, svest i ponašanje mlade generacije Jugoslavije: preliminarna analiza rezultata istraživanja. Beograd: Centar za istraživačku, dokumentacionu i istraživačku delatnost predsedništva konferencije SSOJ.Google Scholar
  133. Vromen, A. (2003). People try to put us down …’: Participatory citizenship of ‘generation X. Australian Journal of Political Science, 38(1), 79–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Vujović, J. (1990). Reforma političkog sistema. In S. Mihailović et al. (Eds.): Deca krize: Omladina Jugoslavije krajem osamdesetih, 38–48. Beograd: Institut društvenih nauka, Centar za politikološka istraživanja i javno mnenje.Google Scholar
  135. Wattenberg, M. (1998). Turnout decline in the U.S. and other advanced industrial democracies. Center for the Study of Democracy (University of California, Irvine). http://escholarship.org/uc/item/1kh6r88m. Accessed 21 Mar 2010.
  136. Welzel, C. (2007). Are levels of democracy affected by mass attitudes? Testing attainment and sustainment effects on democracy. International Political Science Review, 28(4), 397–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Welzel, C. (2011). Emancipative values and the human empowerment process. Unpublished manuscript. Chapter “Measuring and mapping emancipative values”.Google Scholar
  138. Welzel, C., Inglehart, R., & Klingemann, H.-D. (2003). The theory of human development: A cross-cultural analysis. European Journal of Political Research, 42, 341–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. WVS (2012a). World values survey. http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/wvs/articles/folder_published/article_base_46. Accessed 24 Aug 2012.
  140. Zukin, C., Keeter, S., Andolina, M., Jenkins, K., & Delli Carpini, M. X. (2006). A new engagement? Political participation, civic life, and the changing American citizen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MariborMariborSlovenia

Personalised recommendations