The Back Wall of the Niches: Preliminary Considerations

Chapter
Part of the Natural Science in Archaeology book series (ARCHAEOLOGY)

Abstract

The explosion of March 2001 produced the collapse of the two statues, the instability all over the cliff, and a shear zone of hanging blocks in the back side of both niches. This part, despite of the destruction, is still very important because some plasters and excavated elements from the original outline are still on site. Because of this, the back side of the niches are sites to investigate in detail, to explore the connection between civil engineering, earth science, and restoration.

Keywords

Rock Mass Shear Band Ground Penetrate Radar Back Side Damage Assessment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bergh-Christensen J (1968) On the blastability of rocks (in Norwegian). Lic Techn thesis, Geological Institute, Technical University of Norway, Trondheim. 320 pGoogle Scholar
  2. Palmstrom A (1974) Characterization of jointing density and the quality of rock masses (in Norwegian). Internal report, A.B. Berdal, Norway, 26 pGoogle Scholar
  3. Palmstrom A (1982) The volumetric joint count – a useful and simple measure of the degree rock mass jointing. In: Proceedings of the IV congress international association of engineering geology. vol 2. New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  4. Palmstrom A (1995) RMi – a rock mass characterization system for rock engineering purposes. PhD thesis, University of Oslo, Department of Geology, 400 pGoogle Scholar
  5. Palmstrom A (1996) The weighted joint density method leads to improved characterization of jointing. In: International conference on recent advances in tunnelling technology, New Delhi, 6 pGoogle Scholar
  6. Palmstrom A (2005) Measurements of and correlations between block size and rock quality designation (RQD). Tunnels Underground Space Technol 20(2005):362–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. PASCO (2003a) Bamiyan mapping project. UNESCO reportGoogle Scholar
  8. PASCO (2003b) Buddhas laser scanner project. UNESCO reportGoogle Scholar
  9. Roch KH, Werner C, Bruckl E (2006) Potentials of monitoring rock fall hazards by GPR: considering as example the results of Salzburg. Landslide 3:87–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geological Survey of ItalyISPRA – Italian Institute for Protection and Environmental ResearchRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations