Writing IS Research Articles

  • Jan Recker
Part of the Progress in IS book series (PROIS)


In this chapter, we will examine some guidelines and advice that relate to reporting of research conducted. Publication is an essential scholarly activity because it informs academic and other communities about lines of investigation, (and their outcomes) related to relevant phenomenon being studied.


Good Research Ranking List Background Section Good Paper Major Revision 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 15.
    Bem, D.J.: Writing the Empirical Journal Article. In: Darley, J.M., Zanna, M.P., Roediger III, H.L. (eds.) The compleat academic: A practical guide for the beginning social scientist, 2nd edn, pp. 185–219. American Psychological Association, Washington (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 17.
    Bergh, D.D.: From the editors: Thinking strategically about contribution. Acad. Manag. J. 46, 135–136 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 43.
    Daft, R.L.: Why I recommended that your manuscript be rejected and what you can do about it. In: Cummings, L.L., Frost, P.J. (eds.) Publishing in the organizational sciences, 2nd edn, pp. 164–182. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 50.
    Dean, D.L., Lowry, P.B., Humpherys, S.L.: Profiling the research productivity of Tenured Information Systems Faculty at U.S. Institutions. MIS Q. 35, 1–15 (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 62.
    Feldman, D.C.: The devil is in the details: Converting good research into publishable articles. J. Manag. 30, 1–6 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 79.
    Hardaway, D.E., Scamell, R.W.: Open knowledge creation: Bringing transparency and inclusiveness to the peer review process. MIS Q. 36, (2012, in press)Google Scholar
  7. 80.
    Hargittai, E.: Research confidential: Solutions to problems most social scientists pretend they never have. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 91.
    Kane, G.C., Fichman, R.G.: The Shoemaker’s children: Using Wikis for information systems teaching, research, and publication. MIS Q. 33, 1–17 (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 99.
    Lagendijk, A.: Survival guide for scientists: Writing - presentation - email, 3rd edn. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 103.
    Lee, A.S.: Reviewing a manuscript for publication. J. Oper. Manag. 13, 87–92 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 108.
    Lyytinen, K., Baskerville, R., Iivari, J., Te'Eni, D.: Why the old world cannot publish? overcoming challenges in publishing high-impact IS research. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 16, 317–326 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 133.
    Recker, J.: Continued use of process modeling grammars: The impact of individual difference factors. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 19, 76–92 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 134.
    Recker, J.: Explaining usage of process modeling grammars: Comparing three theoretical models in the study of two grammars. Inf. Manag. 47, 316–324 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 136.
    Recker, J., Indulska, M., Rosemann, M., Green, P.: The ontological deficiencies of process modeling in practice. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 19, 501–525 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 139.
    Recker, J., Rosemann, M., Green, P., Indulska, M.: Do ontological deficiencies in modeling grammars matter? MIS Q. 35, 57–79 (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 144.
    Rynes, S.: From the editors: Some reflections on contribution. Acad. Manag. J. 45, 311–313 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 147.
    Schminke, M.: From the editors: Raising the bamboo curtain. Acad. Manag. J. 17, 310–314 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 157.
    Sørensen, C.: This is not an article. Just some thoughts on how to write one. Available at: (2005)
  19. 158.
    Starbuck, W.H.: Fussy professor Starbuck’s cookbook of Handy-Dandy prescriptions for ambitious academic authors or why I hate passive verbs and Love My Word processor. Available at: (1999)Google Scholar
  20. 164.
    Straub, D.W.: Editor’s comments: Creating blue oceans of thought via highly citable articles. MIS Q. 33, iii–vii (2009)Google Scholar
  21. 165.
    Straub, D.W.: Editor’s comments: Why top journals accept your paper. MIS Q. 33, iii–x (2009)Google Scholar
  22. 174.
    Venkatesh, V.: Road to success: A guide for doctoral students and junior faculty members in the behavioral and social sciences. Dog Ear Publishin, Indianapolis (2011)Google Scholar
  23. 184.
    Watson, R.T.: Introducing MISQ review - A new department in MIS Quarterly. MIS Q. 25, 103–106 (2001)Google Scholar
  24. 187.
    Weber, R.: Editor’s comments: Theoretically speaking. MIS Q. 27, iii–xii (2003)Google Scholar
  25. 188.
    Webster, J., Watson, R.T.: Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Q. 26, xiii–xxiii (2002)Google Scholar
  26. 191.
    Whetten, D.A.: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Acad. Manag. Rev. 14, 490–495 (1989)Google Scholar
  27. 192.
    Wilkinson, A.M.: The scientist’s handbook for writing papers and dissertations. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1991)Google Scholar
  28. 196.
    Newell, A. and H.A. Simon, Human Problem Solving 1972, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  29. 197.
    Treisman, A.M. and G. Gelade, A Feature-Integration Theory of Attention. Cognitive Psychology, 1980. 12(1): p. 97–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 198.
    Larkin, J.H. and H.A. Simon, Why a Diagram Is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words. Cognitive Science, 1987. 11(1): p. 65–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 199.
    Petre, M., Why Looking Isn't Always Seeing: Readership Skills and Graphical Programming. Communications of the ACM, 1995. 38(6): p. 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan Recker
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Information SystemsQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbane, QLDAustralia

Personalised recommendations