Farm Level Spatial Microsimulation Modelling

  • Stephen Hynes
  • Karyn Morrissey
  • Cathal O’Donoghue
  • Graham Clarke
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstract

As discussed in Chap. 2, over the last decade, there has been an increase in interest in rural policy at the EU level. Indeed, the European Union Agenda 2000 agreement on agriculture contains an increased focus on rural development, acknowledging it as the second pillar of the Common Agricultural Policy. This increased focus on rural development at the EU level means that member states, including Ireland, have also increased their emphasis on rural development along a range of spectrums, such as reducing socio-economic disparities between regions, enhancing employment and competitiveness in rural areas, and re-orienting agricultural production. According to the Irish White Paper on Rural Development, one of the main goals of rural development policy in Ireland is to maintain “the maximum number of rural farms and especially family farms” (Irish Department of Agriculture and Food 2000).

Keywords

Farm Level Common Agricultural Policy Flat Rate Microsimulation Model Average Farm Size 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ballas D, Clarke GP (2001) Modelling the local impacts of national social policies: a spatial microsimulation approach. Environ Plann C Gov Policy 19:587–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ballas D, Clarke GP, Wiemers E (2005a) Building a dynamic spatial microsimulation model for Ireland. Popul Space Place 11:157–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beard N, Swinbank A (2001) Decoupled payments to facilitate CAP reform. Food Policy 26:121–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Binfield J, Donnellan T, Hanrahan K, Westhoff P (2003) The luxembourg CAP reform agreement: implications for EU and Irish agriculture. In: The luxembourg CAP reform agreement: analysis of the impact on EU and Irish agriculture. Teagasc, DublinGoogle Scholar
  5. Breen J, Hennessy T, Thorne F (2005) The effect of decoupling on the decision to produce: an Irish case study. Food Policy 30:129–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Connolly L, Kinsella A, Quinlan G, Moran B (2009) National farm survey 2008. Teagasc Farm Surveys Department, Rural Economy Research Centre, GalwayGoogle Scholar
  7. CSO (2000) Census of agriculture 2000. www.cso.ie/releasespublications
  8. Department of Agriculture and Food (2000) Ensuring the future – a strategy for rural development in Ireland; white paper on rural development. The Stationery Office, DublinGoogle Scholar
  9. Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (2007) Fact sheet on Irish agriculture. DAFF Publication, DublinGoogle Scholar
  10. Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (2010) Annual report 2009. DOFF, DublinGoogle Scholar
  11. Dowsland K (1993) Simulated annealing. In: Reeves C (ed) Modern heuristic techniques for combinatorial problems. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. Henderson EJ, Capps R, Finegold K (2008) Impact of 2002–03 farm bill restorations on food stamp. Economic research service contractor and cooperator report no. 40Google Scholar
  13. Hennessy T (2004) Projecting farm numbers. 2015 Agri-vision report. Irish Department of Agriculture and Food, DublinGoogle Scholar
  14. Honohan P (1997) EU structural funds in Ireland – a mid-term evaluation of the CSF 1994–99, ESRI, PRS no. 31, DublinGoogle Scholar
  15. Hopkins J, Hanson K, Somwaru A, Burfisher ME (2003) Allocation effects of policy reform: a micro-simulation of macro-model results for the United States. Presented at the workshop on agricultural policy reform and adjustment Imperial college, Wye, 23–25 Oct 2003Google Scholar
  16. Huang Z, Williamson P (2001) A comparison of synthetic reconstruction and combinatorial optimisation approaches to the creation of small-area microdata. Department of Geography Working Paper 2001/2, University of LiverpoolGoogle Scholar
  17. Keeney R (2009) Consequences of biofuel policies for U.S. farm household wealth. Paper prepared for presentation at the agricultural & applied economics association 2009 AAEA & ACCI joint annual meeting, Milwaukee, 26–29 July 2009Google Scholar
  18. Keeney R (2009b) Transfer efficiency and distributional impacts of US farm support – evidence from a macro-micro simulation. Am J Agric Econ 91(5):1289–1295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kelly D (2004) SMILE static simulator software user manual. Teagasc, AthenryGoogle Scholar
  20. Kruseman G, Blokland PW, Bouma F,Luesink H, Mokveld L, Vrolijk H (2008a) Micro-simulation as a tool to assess policy concerning non-point source pollution: the case of ammonia in Dutch agriculture. Paper prepared for presentation at the 107th EAAE Seminar “Modelling of Agricultural and Rural Development Policies”. Sevilla, 29 Jan–1 Feb 2008Google Scholar
  21. Kruseman G, Blokland PW, Luesink H, Mokveld L, Vrolijk H (2008b) Ex-ante evaluation of tightening environmental policy – the case of mineral use in Dutch agriculture. Paper prepared for presentation at the 12th congress of the European association of agricultural economists – EAAE 2008, GhentGoogle Scholar
  22. Lafferty S, Commins P, Walsh J (1999) Irish agriculture in transition – a census atlas of agriculture in the republic of Ireland. Teagasc, DublinGoogle Scholar
  23. Lindgren U, Elmquist H (2005) Environmental and economic impacts of decision-making at an arable farm: an integrative modeling approach. Ambio J Hum Environ 34(4):5Google Scholar
  24. Matthews A (2000) Farm incomes: myths and reality. Cork University Press, CorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Menon M, Perali F, Salvioni C (2003) Microsimulation of the distributional impact of reformed farm support. Paper presented at the international conference agricultural policy reform and the WTO: where are we heading? Capri, 23–26 June 2003Google Scholar
  26. NFS (2006) National farm survey 2005. Teagasc, AthenryGoogle Scholar
  27. Pesti CS, Kaposzta J (2008) Adaptation of statistical matching in micro-regional analysis of agricultural production. Bulletin of the Szent Istvan University, GodolloGoogle Scholar
  28. Projet de decision de la commission (1992) Typologie des exploitations agricoles, 37eme Reunion du Groupe d’ExpertsGoogle Scholar
  29. Ramilan T, Scrimgeour F, Marsh D (2008) Micro-simulation – a novel approach to using farm survey data for catchment scale modeling and policy analysis. Paper presented to the 13th annual conference of the New Zealand agricultural and resource economics society, ViterboGoogle Scholar
  30. Ramilan T, Scrimgeour FG, Levy G, Romera AJ (2009) Modelling economic impact of agri-environmental policy on dairy farms – a catchment perspective. Paper presented to 18th world IMACS/MODSIM congress, Cairns, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  31. Rocchi B (2008) Targeting real farmers with reformed CAP payments: an analysis for Italy. Paper prepared for the 109th EAAE seminar The CAP after the Fischler reform: national 5 implementations, impact assessment and the agenda for future reforms, ViterboGoogle Scholar
  32. Shalloo L, Dillon P, Rath M, Wallace M (2004) The Luxembourg common agricultural policy reform agreement: Irish dairy farmers development options. Farm Manage 12:17–29Google Scholar
  33. Stefani G (2008) Micro-simulation of households: a new tool to assess the impact on society of food safety policies. Eur J Soc Sci Res 21(2):171–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Swinbank A, Tranter R (2005) Decoupling EU farm support: does the new single payment scheme fit within the green box? Estey J Int Law Trade Policy 6(1):47–61Google Scholar
  35. van Bommel K, van der Veen H (2006) Farm strategy and continuation perspective. Paper presented to 96th EAAE-seminar, causes and impacts of agricultural structures, TaenikonGoogle Scholar
  36. Van Leeuwen E, Dekkers J, Rietveld P (2008) The development of a static farm-level spatial microsimulation model to analyse on and off farm activities of Dutch farmers presenting the research framework. Paper presented to the 3rd Israeli – Dutch regional science workshop, Mount ScopusGoogle Scholar
  37. Wolfert J, Lepoutre J, Dol W, van Passel S, van der Veen HB, Bouma F (2005) Microwave: a generic framework for micro-simulation based ex-ante policy evaluation. Modeling agricultural policies: state of the art and new challenges. In: Arfini F (ed) Proceedings of the 89th European seminar of the European association of agricultural economists, Parma, 3–5 Feb 2005, pp 117–137Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen Hynes
    • 1
  • Karyn Morrissey
    • 2
  • Cathal O’Donoghue
    • 3
  • Graham Clarke
    • 4
  1. 1.Socio-Economic Marine Research UnitNational University of Ireland GalwayGalway Co. GalwayIreland
  2. 2.School of Environmental SciencesUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
  3. 3.Rural Economy and Development ProgrammeTeagascAthenryIreland
  4. 4.School of GeographyUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations