Modelling the Spatial Pattern of Rural Tourism and Recreation

  • John Cullinan
  • Stephen Hynes
  • Cathal O’Donoghue
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstract

One of the key strengths of SMILE is its facility to combine spatial data from many diverse sources in order to examine economic, social and environmental issues of importance to the rural economy in Ireland. Indeed, spatial context lies at the heart of many aspects of the rural economy and SMILE, as a modelling and data infrastructure, can be usefully applied in conjunction with techniques such as geographic information systems (GIS) analysis and microeconometrics to examine such issues. One such area of interest is rural tourism. Rural tourism is now an important contributor to rural development in Ireland given the long term decline of agriculture, particularly in its potential for stimulating employment and providing a viable option for off-farm diversification.

Keywords

Geographic Information System Negative Binomial Model Discrete Choice Model Rural Tourism Conditional Logit Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (1998) Regression analysis of count data, vol 30, Econometric society monographs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Carson RT, Hanemann WM, Wegge T (1989) A nested logit model of recreational fishing demand in Alaska. Paper presented at the annual western economic association conference, Lake TahoeGoogle Scholar
  3. Creel MD, Loomis JB (1990) Theoretical and empirical advantages of truncated count data estimators for analysis of deer hunting in California. Am J Agric Econ 72:434–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cullinan J, Hynes S, O’Donoghue C (2008) Estimating catchment area population indicators using network analysis. Ir Geogr 41:279–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Feather P, Hellerstein D, Tomasi T (1995) A discrete-count model of recreation demand. J Environ Econ Manag 29:214–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gomez IA, Ozuna T (1993) Testing for overdispersion in truncated count data recreation demand functions. J Environ Manage 37:117–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Greene WH (1993) Econometric analysis, 2nd edn. MacMillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Grogger JT, Carson RT (1991) Models for truncated counts. J Appl Econom 6:225–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hanley N, Shaw WD, Wright RE (2003) Introduction. In: Hanley N, Shaw WD, Wright RE (eds) The new economics of outdoor recreation. Edward Elgar, Northampton/CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  10. Hanley N, Shogren JF, White B (2007) Environmental economics: in theory and practice, 2nd edn. McMillan, Basingstoke/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Hausman J, Leonard G, McFadden D (1995) A utility-consistent, combined discrete choice and count data model: assessing recreational use losses due to natural resource damage. J Public Econ 56:1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hausman J, McFadden D (1984) Specification tests for the multinomial logit model. Econometrica 52:1219–1240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Herriges JA, Kling CL, Phaneuf D, Herriges JA, Kling CL, Phaneuf D (1999) Valuing recreation and the environment. In: Herriges JA, Kling C (eds) Corner solution models of recreation demand: a comparison of competing frameworks. Edward Elgar, NorthamptonGoogle Scholar
  14. Hynes S, Hanley N (2006) Preservation versus development on Irish rivers: whitewater kayaking and hydro power in Ireland. Land Use Policy 23:170–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hynes S, Hanley N, Garvey E (2007) Up the proverbial creek without a paddle: accounting for variable participant skill levels in recreational demand modeling. Environ Resour Econ 36:413–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnstone C, Markandya A (2006) Valuing river characteristics using combined site choice and participation travel cost models. J Environ Manage 80:237–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McFadden D, Train K (2000) Mixed MNL models for discrete response. J Appl Econom 15:447–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Morey E, Rowe R, Watson M (1993) A repeated nested-logit model of Atlantic salmon fishing. Am J Agric Econ 75:578–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Parsons GR, Jakus PM, Tomais T (1999) A comparison of welfare estimates from four models for linking seasonal recreational trips to multinomial logit models of site choice. J Environ Econ Manage 38:143–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Parsons GR, Kealy MJ (1995) A demand theory for number of trips in a random utility model of recreation. J Environ Econ Manage 29:357–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Parsons GR, Massey D (2003) A RUM model of beach recreation. In: Hanley N, Shaw WD, Wright R (eds) The new economics of outdoor recreation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham/NorthhamptonGoogle Scholar
  22. Shonkwiler JS, Shaw WD (1997) The aggregation of conditional demand systems. Paper presented at the annual W133 regional project annual meetings, MontereyGoogle Scholar
  23. Zandersen M, Termansen M, Jensen FS (2007) Evaluating approaches to predict recreation values of new forest sites. J Forest Econ 13:103–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Cullinan
    • 1
  • Stephen Hynes
    • 2
  • Cathal O’Donoghue
    • 3
  1. 1.Discipline of EconomicsNational University of IrelandGalway Co., GalwayIreland
  2. 2.Socio-Economic Marine Research UnitNational University of IrelandGalway Co. GalwayIreland
  3. 3.Rural Economy and Development ProgrammeTeagascAthenryIreland

Personalised recommendations