Advertisement

Building a Type II Fuzzy Qualitative Regression Model

  • Yicheng Wei
  • Junzo Watada
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 15)

Abstract

The qualitative regression analysis models quantitatively change in the qualitative object variables by using qualitative values of multivariate data (membership degree or type I fuzzy set), which are given by subjective recognitions and judgments. From fuzzy set-theoretical points of view, uncertainty also exists when associated with the membership function of a type I fuzzy set. It will have much impact on the fuzziness of the qualitative objective external criterion. This paper is trying to model the qualitative change of external criterion’s fuzziness by applying type II fuzzy set (we will use type II fuzzy set as well as type II fuzzy data in this paper). Here, qualitative values are assumed to be fuzzy degree of membership in qualitative categories and qualitative change in the objective external criterion is given as the fuzziness of the output.

Keywords

Type II fuzzy qualitative regression model quantification type I fuzzy set type II fuzzy set type I fuzzy number type II fuzzy number linear programming LP 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hayashi, C.: On the Quantification of Qualitative Data from the Mathematico- Statistical Point of View. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 2(1), 35–47 (1950)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hayashi, C.: On the Prediction of Phenomena from Qualitative Data and the Quantification of Qualitative Data from the Mathmatico-Statistical Point of View. Annals of the Institute of Stat. Math. 3, 69–98 (1952)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tanaka, H., Asai, K.: Fuzzy linear programming problems with fuzzy number. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 13(1), 1–10 (1984)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tanaka, H., Uejima, S., Asai, K.: Linear regression analysis with fuzzy model. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics SMC-12(6), 903–907 (1982)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tanaka, H., Watada, J.: Possibilistic linear systems and their application. International Jounal of Fuzzy Sets and Systems 27(3), 275–289 (1988)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Watada, J., Pedrycz, W.: A Possibilistic Regression Approach to Acquisition of Linguistic Rules. In: Pedrycz, W., Skowron, A., Kreinovich, V. (eds.) Handbook on Granular Commutation, ch. 32, pp. 719–740. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Watada, J., Wang, S., Pedrycz, W.: Building Confidence-Interval-Based Fuzzy Random. Regression Models. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 17(6), 1273–1283 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Watada, J., Tanaka, H.: Fuzzy quantification methods. In: Proceedings, the 2nd IFSA Congress, pp. 66–69 (1987)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8(3), 338–353 (1965)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zadeh, L.A.: The Concept of a Linguistic Variable and Its Application to Approximate Reasoning-1. Information Sciences 8(3), 199–249 (1975)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Information, Production and SystemsWaseda UniversityKitakyushuJapan

Personalised recommendations