Location Privacy in Relation to Trusted Peers
One common assumption when defining location privacy metrics is that one is dealing with attackers who have the objective of re-identifying an individual out of an anonymized data set. However, in today’s communication scenarios, user communication and information exchange with (partially) trusted peers is very common, e.g., in communication via social applications. When disclosing voluntarily a single observation to a (partially) trusted communication peer, the user’s privacy seems to be unharmed. However, location data is able to transport much more information than the simple fact of a user being at a specific location. Hence, a user-centric privacy metric is required in order to measure the extent of exposure by releasing (a set of) location observations. The goal of such a metric is to enable individuals to estimate the privacy loss caused by disclosing further location information in a specific communication scenario and thus enabling the user to make informed choices, e.g., choose the right protection mechanism.
KeywordsLocation Information Information Gain Location Privacy Location Observation Adversary Model
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Westin, A.F.: Privacy and Freedom, 1st edn., Atheneum, New York (1967)Google Scholar
- 2.Duckham, M., Kulik, L.: Location privacy and location-aware computing, pp. 35–51. CRC Press, Boca Rator (2006)Google Scholar
- 12.Toch, E., Cranshaw, J., Drielsma, P.H., Tsai, J.Y., Kelley, P.G., Springfield, J., Cranor, L., Hong, J., Sadeh, N.: Empirical models of privacy in location sharing. In: Ubicomp 2010: Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, pp. 129–138. ACM, New York (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Bayir, M., Demirbas, M., Eagle, N.: Discovering spatiotemporal mobility profiles of cellphone users. In: IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks & Workshops, WoWMoM 2009, pp. 1–9 (2009)Google Scholar