Advertisement

Asynclitism: Clinical and Intrapartum Diagnosis in Labor

  • Antonino F. Barbera
  • Andrea Tinelli
  • Antonio Malvasi
Chapter

Abstract

The position of the fetal head at engagement and during descent through the birth canal has proven to be one of the hardest obstacles to overcome during labor [1] and quite frequently it is a cause of failure of labor progress, with consequent delivery of the fetus via cesarean section.

Keywords

Parietal Bone Fetal Head Sagittal Suture Birth Canal Operative Vaginal Delivery 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgment

The author wants to express his gratitude to Helen Macfarlane for the extensive and superb work in the production of the graphic representations. Further thank you to Elizabeth Figa for her contribution in structuring Table 6.1.

References

  1. 1.
    Nizard J, Haberman S, Paltieli Y, Gonen R, Ohel G, Le Bourthe Y, Ville Y (2009) Determination of fetal head station and position during labor: a new technique that combines ultrasound and a position-tracking system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200:404–e1–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Smith WT (1858) The mechanism of labor. In: A manual of obstetrics: theoretical and practical, Chapter XXII. Savill and Edwards, Printers, Chandon Street, London, pp 265–289Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 17, June 2000. Operative Vaginal Delivery. Compendium of selected publications, ACOG: Washington, DC, 2007Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    5a.2. The parietal bone. Figure 132 – Left parietal bone. Outer surface. www.theodora.com/anatomy/the_parietal_bone.html
  5. 5.
    O’Grady JP (1988) Forceps operation. In: Modern instrument delivery, Chapter 3. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 83–154Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dupuis O, Silveira R, Zentner A, Dittmar A, Gaucherand P, Cucherat M, Redarce T et al (2005) Birth simulator: reliability of transvaginal assessment of fetal head station as defined by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologist classification. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:868–874PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barbera AF, Imani F, Necker T, Lezotte DC, Hobbins JC (2009) Anatomic relationship between the pubic symphysis and ischial spines and its clinical significance in the assessment of fetal engagement and station during labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 33:320–325PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fuchs I, Tutschek B, Henrich W (2008) Visualization of the fetal fontanels and skull by three-dimensional translabial ultrasound during the second stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31:484–486PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Malvasi A, Tinelli A, Stark M (2011) Intrapartum sonography sign for occiput posterior asynclitism diagnosis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 24(3):553–554PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Blasi I, D’Amico R, Fenu V, Volpe A, Fuchs I, Henrich W, Mazza V (2010) Sonographic assessment of fetal spine and head position during the first and second stages of labor for the diagnosis of persistent occiput posterior position: a pilot study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 35:210–215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Malvasi A, Tinelli A, Brizzi A, Guido M, Laterza F, De Nunzio G, Bochicchio M, Ghi T, Stark M, Benhamou D, Di Renzo G (2011) Intrapartum sonography head transverse and asynclitic diagnosis with and without epidural analgesia initiated early during the first stage of labor. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 15:518–523PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ghi T, Youssef A, Pilu G, Malvasi A, Ragusa A (2012) Intrapartum sonographic imaging of fetal head asynclitism. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 39(2):238–240. doi: 10.1002/uog.9034 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Akmal S, Tsoi E, Kametas N, Howard R, Nicolaides KH (2002) Intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 12:172–177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Akmal S, Kametas N, Tsoi E, Hargreaves C, Nicolaides KH (2003) Comparison of transvaginal digital examination with intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position before instrumental delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 21:437–440PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sherer DM, Miodovnik M, Bradley KS, Langer O (2002) Intrapartum fetal head position I: Comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the active stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 19:258–263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Souka AP, Haritos T, Basayiannis K, Noikokyri N, Antsaklis A (2003) Intrapartum ultrasound for the examination of the fetal head position in normal and obstructed labor. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 13:59–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chou MR, Kreizer D, Taslimi MM, Druzin ML, El Sayed Y (2004) Vaginal versus ultrasound ­examination of fetal head position occiput position during the second stage of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 19:521–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zahalka N, Sadan O, Malinger G, Liberati M, Boaz M, Glezerman M et al (2005) Comparison of transvaginal sonography with digital examination and transabdominal sonography for the determination of fetal head position in the second stage of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:381–386PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Malvasi A, Stark M, Ghi T, Farine D, Guido M, Tinelli A (2012) Intrapartum sonography for fetal head asynclitism and transverse position: sonographic signs and comparison of diagnostic performance between transvaginal and digital examination. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 25(5):508–12, Epub 2012 Feb 14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dupuis O, Ruimark S, Corinne D, Simone T, Andre’ D, Rene’-Charles R (2005) Fetal head position during the second stage of labor: comparison of digital vaginal examination and transabdominal ultrasonographic examination. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 123:193–197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sherer DM (2007) Intrapartum ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30:123–139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cunningham FG, Gant NF, Leveno KJ, Gilstrap LC III, Hauth JC, Wenstrom KD (2001) Mechanisms of normal labor. In: Williams obstetrics, 21nd edn, Section III, Chapter 12. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 291–307Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Barbera A, Hobbins JC (1997) Applicazioni di semeiotica ecografica in travaglio di parto. In: Gruppo di studio SIGO, Tecnologie informatiche e biofisiche in Ostetricia e Ginecologia. Trattato di Ecografia in Ostericia e Ginecologia. Prima edizione. Poletto Editore, pp 389–394Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Barbera AF, Pombar X, Perugino G, Lezotte DC, Hobbins JC (2009) A new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 33:313–319PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonino F. Barbera
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Andrea Tinelli
    • 5
  • Antonio Malvasi
    • 6
  1. 1.Swan Mountain, Women’s CenterBreckenridgeUSA
  2. 2.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of MedicineUniversity of Colorado DenverAuroraUSA
  3. 3.Rocky Vista University, College of Osteopathic MedicineParkerUSA
  4. 4.Department of Obstetric and GynecologyDenver Health Medical CenterDenverUSA
  5. 5.Division of Experimental Endoscopic Surgery, Imaging, Minimally Invasive Therapy and Technology, Department of Obstetric and GynecologyVito Fazzi HospitalLecceItaly
  6. 6.Department of Obstetric and GynecologySanta Maria HospitalBariItaly

Personalised recommendations