General Intrapartum Sonography Setup and Use in Labor

  • Miguel Angel Barber
  • Francisca S. Molina
  • Margarita Medina
  • Azahar Romero
  • Jose A. Garcia-Hernandez


We are currently witnessing a change in obstetrics. For more than 10 years, obstetric sonography has been the main diagnostic tool available to specialists. Currently, the prediction of conditions such as preeclampsia, preterm labor, or placental insufficiency within the context of intrauterine growth restriction is based on ultrasound use. It is logical to hypothesize that sonography could play a significant, expanded role in labor management and assistance, particularly in situations that require quick obstetric decisions based on clinical explorations that are subjective and have a considerable learning curve.


Head Direction Delivery Room Fetal Head Transabdominal Ultrasound Instrumental Delivery 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Barber M, Gutierrez L, Plasencia W, Valle L, Garcia-Hernandez JA (2010) Role of ultrasound in the labor ward. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 30(3):241–243Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barbera AF, Pombar X, Perugino G, Lezotte DC, Hobbins JC (2009) A new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 33(3):313–319PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eggebo T, Salvesen K (2010) Ultrasound assessment of fetal head position. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 36:128–129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ghi T, Contro E, Farina A, Nobile M, Pilu G (2010) Three-dimensional ultrasound in monitoring progression of labor: a reproducibility study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 36(4):500–506PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vintzileos AM, Chavez MR, Kinzler WL (2010) Use of ultrasound in the labor and delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 23(6):469–475PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sherer D, Miodovnik M, Bradley K, Langer O (2002) Intrapartum fetal head position II: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the second stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 19(3):264–268PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sherer D, Miodovnik M, Bradley K, Langer O (2002) Intrapartum fetal head position I: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the active stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 19(3):258–263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Akmal S, Tsoi E, Kametas N, Howard R, Nicolaides K (2002) Intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 12(3):172–177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Akmal S, Tsoi E, Nicolaides K (2004) Intrapartum sonography to determine fetal occipital position: ­interobserver agreement. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 24(4):421–424PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Souka A, Haritos T, Basayiannis K, Noikokyri N, Antsaklis A (2003) Intrapartum ultrasound for the examination of the fetal head position in normal and obstructed labor. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 13(1):59–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kreiser D, Schiff E, Lipitz S, Kayam Z, Avraham A, Achiron R (2001) Determination of fetal occiput ­position by ultrasound during the second stage of labor. J Matern Fetal Med 10(4):283–286PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dupuis O, Ruimark S, Corinne D, Simone T, André D, René-Charles R (2005) Fetal head position during the second stage of labor: comparison of digital vaginal examination and transabdominal ultrasonographic examination. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 123(2):193–197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chou M, Kreiser D, Taslimi M, Druzin M, El-Sayed Y (2004) Vaginal versus ultrasound examination of fetal occiput position during the second stage of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191(2):521–524PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zahalka N, Sadan O, Malinger G, Liberati M, Boaz M, Glezerman M et al (2005) Comparison of transvaginal sonography with digital examination and transabdominal sonography for the determination of fetal head position in the second stage of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193(2):381–386PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Agarwal U, Bricker L, Alfirevic Z (2011) The use of 3D ultrasound for the prediction of success of vaginal birth prior to instrumental delivery. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 96:Fa85Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dückelmann AM, Michaelis SA, Bamberg C, Dudenhausen JW, Kalache KD (2011) Impact of intrapartal ultrasound to assess fetal head position and station on the type of obstetrical interventions at full cervical dilatation. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 25(5):484–488PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rayburn W, Siemers K, Legino L, Nabity M, Anderson J, Patil K (1989) Dystocia in late labor: determining fetal position by clinical and ultrasonic techniques. Am J Perinatol 6(3):316–319PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wong G, Mok Y, Wong S (2007) Transabdominal ultrasound assessment of the fetal head and the accuracy of vacuum cup application. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 98(2):120–123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Akmal S, Kametas N, Tsoi E, Hargreaves C, Nicolaides K (2003) Comparison of transvaginal digital examination with intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position before instrumental delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 21(5):437–440PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fuchs I, Tutschek B, Henrich W (2008) Visualization of the fetal fontanels and skull by three-dimensional translabial ultrasound during the second stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31:484–486PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sherer D, Abulafia O (2003) Intrapartum assessment of fetal head engagement: comparison between ­transvaginal digital and transabdominal ultrasound determinations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 21(5):430–436PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Molina F, Nicolaides K (2010) Ultrasound in labor and delivery. Fetal Diagn Ther 27:61–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dupuis O, Silveira R, Zentner A, Dittmar A, Gaucherand P, Cucherat M, Redarce T, Rudigoz RC (2005) Birth simulator: reliability of transvaginal assessment of fetal head station as defined by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists classification. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:868–874PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Torkildsen EA, Salvesen KÅ, Eggebø TM (2011) Prediction of delivery mode with transperineal ultrasound in women with prolonged first stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 37(6):702–708PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kalache K, Dückelmann A, Michaelis S, Lange J, Cichon G, Dudenhausen J (2009) Transperineal ultrasound imaging in prolonged second stage of labor with occipitoanterior presenting fetuses: how well does the ‘angle of progression’ predict the mode of delivery? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 33(3):326–330PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Barbera A, Imani F, Becker T, Lezotte D, Hobbins J (2009) Anatomic relationship between the pubic symphysis and ischial spines and its clinical significance in the assessment of fetal head engagement and station during labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 33(3):320–325PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Henrich W, Dudenhausen J, Fuchs I, Kämena A, Tutschek B (2006) Intrapartum translabial ultrasound (ITU): sonographic landmarks and correlation with successful vacuum extraction. Ultrasoxund Obstet Gynecol 28(6):753–760PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dietz H, Lanzarone V (2005) Measuring engagement of the fetal head: validity and reproducibility of a new ultrasound technique. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 25(2):165–168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dückelmann AM, Bamberg C, Michaelis SA, Lange J, Nonnenmacher A, Dudenhausen JW, Kalache KD (2010) Measurement of fetal head descent using the ‘angle of progression’ on transperineal ultrasound imaging is reliable regardless of fetal head station or ultrasound expertise. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 35(2):216–222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ghi T, Farina A, Pedrazzi A, Rizzo N, Pelusi G, Pilu G (2009) Diagnosis of station and rotation of the fetal head in the second stage of labor with intrapartum translabial ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 33(3):331–336PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Molina FS, Terra R, Carrillo MP, Puertas A, Nicolaides KH (2010) What is the most reliable ultrasound parameter for assessment of fetal head descent? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 36(4):493–499PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dietz H, Bennet M (2002) Can we predict the course of labour? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 42:S16Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Senécal J, Xiong X, Fraser W (2005) Effect of fetal position on second-stage duration and labor outcome. Obstet Gynecol 105(4):763–772PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dietz H, Lanzarone V, Simpson J (2006) Predicting operative delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 27(4):409–415PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dietz H, Lanzarone V (2004) Predicting delivery mode. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 24:220Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Akmal S, Tsoi E, Howard R, Osei E, Nicolaides K (2004) Investigation of occiput posterior delivery by intrapartum sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 24(4):425–428PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Heazell A, Raouf S, Bhatti N, Smewing S (2004) A prospective study of the use of ultrasound scanning on the delivery suite. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 24(3):285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sen S, Majumdar A (2006) Is there any role of ultrasound in the labor ward and delivery suite? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 26(4):586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Shipp T, Bromley B, Benacerraf B (2000) The prognostic significance of hyperextension of the fetal head detected antenatally with ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 15(5):391–396PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sherer D (2007) Intrapartum ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30(2):123–139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    McEwing R (2007) Prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta: a new sonographic marker? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30(4):554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Deans R, Dietz H (2006) Ultrasound of the post-partum uterus. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 46(4):345–349PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Verhoeven CJ, Rückert ME, Opmeer BC, Pajkrt E, Mol BW (2012) Ultrasonographic fetal head position to predict mode of delivery: a systematic review and bivariate meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 40(1):9–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Janbu T, Nesheim B (1987) Uterine artery blood velocities during contractions in pregnancy and labour related to intrauterine pressure. Br J Obstet Gynecol 94:1150–1155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kassanos D, Siristatidis C, Vitoratos N, Salamalekis E, Creatsas G (2003) The clinical significance of Doppler findings in fetal middle cerebral artery during labor. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 109(1):45–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Fleischer A, Anyaegbunam A, Schulman H, Farmakides G, Randolph G (1987) Uterine and umbilical artery velocimetry during normal labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 157(1):40–43PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Krapp M, Denzel S, Katalinic A, Berg C, Smrcek J, Geipel A et al (2002) Normal values of fetal ductus venosus blood flow waveforms during the first stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 19:556–561PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Qin Y, Wang C, Lau T, Rogers M (2000) Color ultrasonography: a useful technique in the identification of nuchal cord during labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 15(5):413–417PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Ghi T, Youssef A, Pilu G, Malvasi A, Ragusa A (2012) Intrapartum sonographic imaging of fetal head asynclitism. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 39(2):238–240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ville Y (2006) From obstetrics ultrasound to ultrasonographic obstetrics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 27(1):1–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ugwumadu A (2002) The role of ultrasound on the labor ward. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 19(3):222–224PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Sherer D, Onyeije C, Bernstein P, Kovacs P, Manning F (1999) Utilization of real-time ultrasound on labor and delivery in an active academic teaching hospital. Am J Perinatol 16(6):303–307PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Yeo L, Romero R (2009) Sonographic evaluation in the second stage of labor to improve the assessment of labor progress and its outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 33(3):253–258PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miguel Angel Barber
    • 1
    • 2
  • Francisca S. Molina
    • 3
  • Margarita Medina
    • 1
  • Azahar Romero
    • 1
  • Jose A. Garcia-Hernandez
    • 1
  1. 1.Prenatal Diagnosis and Fetal Therapy Unit, Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyInsular and Maternal Universitary Hospitalary Complex (CHUIMIC)Las Palmas of Grand CanarySpain
  2. 2.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyCanaries University Hospital Maternity WardLas Palmas de Gran CanariaSpain
  3. 3.Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and GynecologySan Cecilio University Hospital (HUSC)GranadaSpain

Personalised recommendations