The Greenhouse Metaphor and the Greenhouse Effect: A Case Study of a Flawed Analogous Model

  • Xiang Chen
Part of the Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics book series (SAPERE, volume 2)


Metaphors are double-edge swords. By connecting an abstract and unknown phenomenon to a tangible and familiar one, a metaphor also creates a new reality. For example, we frequently use a metaphor to describe global warming – the atmosphere works like a greenhouse and CO2 traps heat as panes of glass in a greenhouse do. However, this greenhouse metaphor leads to an ontological assumption that conceptualizes heat as a material-like object, a series of ideas that ignore the roles of the ocean in the process of thermal transfer within the climate system, and an underestimation of the time delay effect in climate change. By producing an illusion that the climate system will respond instantly at the moment when CO2 level is reduced, the greenhouse metaphor is ultimately responsible for the wait-and-see approach to climate change.


Global Warming Climate System Conceptual Change Global Temperature Warming Trend 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baillargeon, R., Spelke, E., Wasserman, S.: Object permanence in 5-month-old infants. Cognition 20, 191–208 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boyes, E., Stanisstreet, M.: Children’s models of understanding of the two major global environmental issues (Ozone layer and greenhouse effect). Research in Science & Technological Education 15, 19–28 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carey, S.: The origin of concepts. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen, X.: The object bias and the study of scientific revolutions: Lessons from developmental psychology. Philosophical Psychology 20, 479–503 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, X.: A different kind of revolutionary change: Transformation from object to process concepts. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 41, 182–191 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, X.: Why do people misunderstand climate change? Heuristics, mental models and ontological assumptions. Climatic Change 108, 31–46 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chi, M.: Three types of conceptual change: Belief revision, mental model transformation, and categorical shift. In: Vosniadou, S. (ed.) International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change, pp. 61–82. Routledge, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  8. Fiddaman, T.: Feedback complexity in integrated climate-economy models. Ph.D Thesis, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge MA 02142 (1997)Google Scholar
  9. Fleming, J.: Historical perspectives on climate change. Oxford University Press, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  10. Keil, F.: Semantic and conceptual development: An ontological perspective. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1979)Google Scholar
  11. Khalid, T.: Pre-service high school teachers’ perceptions of three environmental phenomena. Environmental Education Research 9, 35–50 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lakoff, G., Johnson, M.: Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1980)Google Scholar
  13. Moxnes, E.: Overexploitation of renewable resources: The role of misperceptions. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 37, 107–127 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Shepardson, D., Niyogi, D., Choi, S., Charusombat, U.: Seventh grade students’ conceptions of global warming and climate change. Environmental Education Research 15, 549–570 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K., et al.: Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)Google Scholar
  16. Sterman, J., Booth Sweeney, L.: Understanding public complacency about climate change: Adults’ mental models of climate change violate conservation of matter. Climate Change 80, 213–238 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. The Ocean Project, America, the ocean, and climate change: New research insights for conservation, awareness, and action (2009),
  18. US Environmental Protection Agency (2009), Climate change: Kids site,
  19. Vosniadou, S.: Analogical reasoning as a mechanism in knowledge acquisition: a developmental perspective. In: Vosniadou, S., Ortony, A. (eds.) Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, pp. 413–437. Cambridge University Press, New York (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyCalifornia Lutheran UniversityThousand OaksUSA

Personalised recommendations