Abstract
Recent information systems (IS) publications reveal an emerging interest in studying post-acceptance system usage behaviors. Compared to adoption and initial use, understanding of IS post-acceptance use is still at its early stage. To further develop knowledge about this phenomenon, this study reviews a variety of post-acceptance usage and ambidexterity concepts. An ambidexterity view is then proposed as an alternative perspective to understand these post-acceptance behaviors.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Westland, J.C., Clark, T.H.K.: Global Electronic Commerce Theory and Case Studies. Universities Press (2001)
Jasperson, J., Carter, P.E., Zmud, R.W.: A comprehensive conceptualization of post-adoptive behaviors associated with information technology enabled work systems. MIS Quarterly 29(3), 525–557 (2005)
AberdeenGroup: The Precision Marketing Benchmark Report: How Top Performers Turbo-Charge Their Investment. Aberdeen Group (2006)
Ahuja, M.K., Thatcher, J.B.: Moving beyond intentions and toward the theory of trying:effects of work of work environment and gender on post-adoptation information technology use. MIS Quarterly 29(3), 427–459 (2005)
Kim, S.S., Son, J.-Y.: Out of dedication or constraint?a dual model of post-adoption phenomena adn its empirical test in the context of online services. MIS Quarterly 33(1), 49–70 (2009)
Cooper, R.B., Zmud, R.W.: Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach. Management Science 36(2), 123–139 (1990)
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of inforamtion technology: toward a unifed view. MIS Quarterly 27(3), 425–478 (2003)
Agarwal, R., Karahanna, E.: Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 665–694 (2000)
Bhattacherjee, A., Premkumar, G.: Understanding changes in belief and attitude toward information technology usage: A theoretical model and longitudinal test. MIS Quarterly, 229–254 (2004)
Saga, V.L., Zmud, R.W.: The nature and determinants of IT acceptance, routinization, and infusion, pp. 67–86. Elsevier Science Inc. (1993)
Schwarz, A.H.: Defining information technology acceptance: a human-centered, management-oriented perspective (2003)
Jones, E., Sundaram, S., Chin, W.: Factors leading to sales force automation use: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management 22(3), 145–156 (2002)
Ahuja, M.K., Thatcher, J.B.: Moving beyond intentions and toward the theory of trying: Effects of work environment and gender on post-adoption information technology use. MIS Quarterly, 427–459 (2005)
Hsieh, J.J.P.A., Wang, W.: Explaining employees’ Extended Use of complex information systems. European Journal of Information Systems 16(3), 216–227 (2007)
Saga, V.L., Zmud, R.W.: The nature and determinants of IT acceptance, routinization and infusion. Diffusion Transfer and Implementation of Information Technology 45(A-45), 67–86 (1994)
Wang, W., Hsieh, P.A.: Beyond routine: Symbolic adoption, extended use, and emergent use of complex information systems in the mandatory organizational context (2006)
Gupta, A.K., Smith, K.G., Shalley, C.E.: The interplay between exploration and exploitation. The Academy of Management Journal ARCHIVE 49(4), 693–706 (2006)
Gibson, C.B., Birkinshaw, J.: The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. The Academy of Management Journal, 209–226 (2004)
Lubatkin, M.H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., Veiga, J.F.: Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management 32(5), 646–672 (2006)
Gulati, R., Puranam, P.: Renewal through reorganization: The value of inconsistencies between formal and informal organization. Organization Science 20(2), 422–440 (2009)
Beckman, C.M.: The influence of founding team company affiliations on firm behavior. The Academy of Management Journal ARCHIVE 49(4), 741–758 (2006)
Auh, S., Menguc, B.: Balancing exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of competitive intensity. Journal of Business Research 58(12), 1652–1661 (2005)
Jansen, J.J.P., Van Den Bosch, F.A.J., Volberda, H.W.: Exploratery Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators. Management Science 52(11), 1661 (2006)
Atuahene-Gima, K.: Resolving the capability: Rigidity paradox in new product innovation. Journal of Marketing, 61–83 (2005)
Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., Tushman, M.L.: Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science 20(4), 685–695 (2009)
Benner, M.J., Tushman, M.L.: Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review 28(2), 238–256 (2003)
Adler, P.S., Goldoftas, B., Levine, D.I.: Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organization Science, 43–68 (1999)
Jansen, J.J.P., George, G., Van den Bosch, F.A.J., Volberda, H.W.: Senior team attributes and organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of transformational leadership. Journal of Management Studies 45(5), 982–1007 (2008)
March, J.G.: Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2(1), 71–87 (1991)
Bontis, N., Crossan, M.M., Hulland, J.: Managing an organizational learning system by aligning stocks and flows. Journal of Management Studies 39(4), 437–469 (2002)
Holmqvist, M.: Experiential learning processes of exploitation and exploration within and between organizations: An empirical study of product development. Organization Science, 70–81 (2004)
Levinthal, D.A., March, J.G.: The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal 14(S2), 95–112 (1993)
McGrath, R.G.: Exploratory learning, innovative capacity and managerial oversight. Academy of Management Journal, 118–131 (2001)
Teece, D.J.: Dynamic capabilities and strategic management: organizing for innovation and growth. Oxford University Press, USA (2009)
Vidgen, R., Allen, P., Finnegan, P.: Towards’ Open’IS Managers: An Exploration of Individual-Level Connectedness, Ambidexterity, and Performance, pp. 1–10. IEEE (2011)
Varian, H.R., Shapiro, C.: Information rules: a strategic guide to the network economy. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge (1999)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Luo, Y., Ling, H., Zhang, C., Xu, Z. (2012). Understanding Post-acceptance Usage Behaviors–An Ambidexterity View. In: Watada, J., Watanabe, T., Phillips-Wren, G., Howlett, R., Jain, L. (eds) Intelligent Decision Technologies. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 16. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29920-9_52
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29920-9_52
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-29919-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-29920-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)