Understanding Post-acceptance Usage Behaviors–An Ambidexterity View

  • Yumei Luo
  • Hong Ling
  • Chenghong Zhang
  • Zhengchuan Xu
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 16)

Abstract

Recent information systems (IS) publications reveal an emerging interest in studying post-acceptance system usage behaviors. Compared to adoption and initial use, understanding of IS post-acceptance use is still at its early stage. To further develop knowledge about this phenomenon, this study reviews a variety of post-acceptance usage and ambidexterity concepts. An ambidexterity view is then proposed as an alternative perspective to understand these post-acceptance behaviors.

Keywords

post-acceptance use ambidexterity learning innovation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Westland, J.C., Clark, T.H.K.: Global Electronic Commerce Theory and Case Studies. Universities Press (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jasperson, J., Carter, P.E., Zmud, R.W.: A comprehensive conceptualization of post-adoptive behaviors associated with information technology enabled work systems. MIS Quarterly 29(3), 525–557 (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    AberdeenGroup: The Precision Marketing Benchmark Report: How Top Performers Turbo-Charge Their Investment. Aberdeen Group (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ahuja, M.K., Thatcher, J.B.: Moving beyond intentions and toward the theory of trying:effects of work of work environment and gender on post-adoptation information technology use. MIS Quarterly 29(3), 427–459 (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim, S.S., Son, J.-Y.: Out of dedication or constraint?a dual model of post-adoption phenomena adn its empirical test in the context of online services. MIS Quarterly 33(1), 49–70 (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cooper, R.B., Zmud, R.W.: Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach. Management Science 36(2), 123–139 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of inforamtion technology: toward a unifed view. MIS Quarterly 27(3), 425–478 (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Agarwal, R., Karahanna, E.: Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 665–694 (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bhattacherjee, A., Premkumar, G.: Understanding changes in belief and attitude toward information technology usage: A theoretical model and longitudinal test. MIS Quarterly, 229–254 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Saga, V.L., Zmud, R.W.: The nature and determinants of IT acceptance, routinization, and infusion, pp. 67–86. Elsevier Science Inc. (1993)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schwarz, A.H.: Defining information technology acceptance: a human-centered, management-oriented perspective (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jones, E., Sundaram, S., Chin, W.: Factors leading to sales force automation use: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management 22(3), 145–156 (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ahuja, M.K., Thatcher, J.B.: Moving beyond intentions and toward the theory of trying: Effects of work environment and gender on post-adoption information technology use. MIS Quarterly, 427–459 (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hsieh, J.J.P.A., Wang, W.: Explaining employees’ Extended Use of complex information systems. European Journal of Information Systems 16(3), 216–227 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Saga, V.L., Zmud, R.W.: The nature and determinants of IT acceptance, routinization and infusion. Diffusion Transfer and Implementation of Information Technology 45(A-45), 67–86 (1994)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang, W., Hsieh, P.A.: Beyond routine: Symbolic adoption, extended use, and emergent use of complex information systems in the mandatory organizational context (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gupta, A.K., Smith, K.G., Shalley, C.E.: The interplay between exploration and exploitation. The Academy of Management Journal ARCHIVE 49(4), 693–706 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gibson, C.B., Birkinshaw, J.: The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. The Academy of Management Journal, 209–226 (2004)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lubatkin, M.H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., Veiga, J.F.: Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management 32(5), 646–672 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gulati, R., Puranam, P.: Renewal through reorganization: The value of inconsistencies between formal and informal organization. Organization Science 20(2), 422–440 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Beckman, C.M.: The influence of founding team company affiliations on firm behavior. The Academy of Management Journal ARCHIVE 49(4), 741–758 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Auh, S., Menguc, B.: Balancing exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of competitive intensity. Journal of Business Research 58(12), 1652–1661 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jansen, J.J.P., Van Den Bosch, F.A.J., Volberda, H.W.: Exploratery Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators. Management Science 52(11), 1661 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Atuahene-Gima, K.: Resolving the capability: Rigidity paradox in new product innovation. Journal of Marketing, 61–83 (2005)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., Tushman, M.L.: Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science 20(4), 685–695 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Benner, M.J., Tushman, M.L.: Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review 28(2), 238–256 (2003)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Adler, P.S., Goldoftas, B., Levine, D.I.: Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organization Science, 43–68 (1999)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jansen, J.J.P., George, G., Van den Bosch, F.A.J., Volberda, H.W.: Senior team attributes and organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of transformational leadership. Journal of Management Studies 45(5), 982–1007 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    March, J.G.: Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2(1), 71–87 (1991)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bontis, N., Crossan, M.M., Hulland, J.: Managing an organizational learning system by aligning stocks and flows. Journal of Management Studies 39(4), 437–469 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Holmqvist, M.: Experiential learning processes of exploitation and exploration within and between organizations: An empirical study of product development. Organization Science, 70–81 (2004)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Levinthal, D.A., March, J.G.: The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal 14(S2), 95–112 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    McGrath, R.G.: Exploratory learning, innovative capacity and managerial oversight. Academy of Management Journal, 118–131 (2001)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Teece, D.J.: Dynamic capabilities and strategic management: organizing for innovation and growth. Oxford University Press, USA (2009)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Vidgen, R., Allen, P., Finnegan, P.: Towards’ Open’IS Managers: An Exploration of Individual-Level Connectedness, Ambidexterity, and Performance, pp. 1–10. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Varian, H.R., Shapiro, C.: Information rules: a strategic guide to the network economy. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yumei Luo
    • 1
    • 2
  • Hong Ling
    • 1
  • Chenghong Zhang
    • 1
  • Zhengchuan Xu
    • 1
  1. 1.School of ManagementFudan UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.School of Business Management and Tour managementYunnan UniversityKunmingChina

Personalised recommendations