On a Patent Analysis Method for Identifying Core Technologies

  • Chulhyun Kim
  • Hyeonju Seol
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 16)


This study proposes a new approach to identifying core technologies from the perspectives of co-occurrence, relatedness, and cross-impact based on patent co-classification information with consideration of the overall interrelationships among technologies. First, association rule mining is employed to derive the co-occurrence, relatedness, and cross-impact indexes and three technological matrixes are constructed. Second, the analytic network process is conducted to produce importance values of technologies for three perspectives with consideration of their direct and indirect impacts. Finally, data envelopment analysis is applied to identify priorities of technologies. The proposed approach can be utilized for technology monitoring for both technology planning of firms and innovation policy making of governments.


Association rule mining (ARM) Analytic network process (ANP) Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) Core technology Patent co-classification 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Agrawal, R., Imielinski, T., Swami, A.: Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases. In: Proc. of the ACM SIGMOD Int. Superence on Manag. of Data, pp. 207–216 (1993)Google Scholar
  2. Agrawal, R., Srikant, R.: Fast algorithms for mining association rules. In: Proc. of the 20th VLDB Superence, pp. 478–499 (1994)Google Scholar
  3. Banker, R.D., Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W.: Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiency in data envelopment analysis. Manag. Sci. 30(9), 1078–1092 (1984)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Rhodes, E.: Measuring efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2(6), 429–444 (1978)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Choi, C., Kim, S., Park, Y.: A patent-based cross-impact analysis for quantitative estimation of technology impact: The case of information and communication technology. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 74(8), 1296–1314 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Engelsman, E.C., van Rann, A.F.J.: A patent-based cartography of technology. Res. Policy 23(1), 1–26 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hall, B., Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M.: The NBER patent citations data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 8498 (2001)Google Scholar
  8. Han, J., Kamber, M.: Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques. Academic Press, San Diego (2001)Google Scholar
  9. Lee, H., Kim, C., Cho, H., Park, Y.: An ANP-based technology network for identification of core technologies: A case of telecommunication technologies. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(1), 894–908 (2009a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lee, H., Park, Y., Choi, H.: Comparative evaluation of performance of national R&D programs with heterogeneous objectives: A DEA approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 196(3), 847–855 (2009b)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. OECD, Using patent data as science and technology indicators - patent manual. OECD, Paris (1994)Google Scholar
  12. Saaty, T.: Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh (1996)Google Scholar
  13. Salton, G., McGill, M.J.: Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. McGraw-Hill, New York (1983)MATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Trajtenberg, M.: A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of inventions. RAND J. Econ. 21(1), 172–187 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. USPTO, Overview of the US patent classification system (2006),
  16. Yoon, B., Park, Y.: A text-mining based patent network: Analytical tool for high-technology trend. J. High Technol. Manag. Res. 15(1), 37–50 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Induk UniversitySeoulSouth Korea
  2. 2.Korea Air Force AcademyCheongwon-gunSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations