High-Throughput-Screening of Medical Image Data on Heterogeneous Clusters

  • Peter Zinterhof
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7116)


Non-invasive medical imaging by means of computed tomography (CT) and fMRI helps clinicians to improve diagnostics and - hopefully - treatment of patients. Due to better image resolutions as well as ever increasing numbers of patients who undergo these procedures, the amount of data that have to be analyzed puts great strain on radiologists. In an ongoing development with SALK (Salzburger Landeskrankenhaus) we propose a system for automated screening of CT data for cysts in the patient’s kidney area. The proper detection of kidneys is non-trivial, due the high variance of possible size, location, levels of contrast and possible pathological anomalies a human kidney can expose in a CT slice. We employ large-scale, semi-automatically generated dictionaries (based on 107 training images) to be used in injunction with principal component analysis (PCA). Heterogeneous clusters of CPU-, GPGPU-, and Cell BE-processors are used for high-throughput-screening of CT data. For data-parallel programming CUDA, OpenCL and the IBM Cell SDK have been used. Task parallelism is based on OpenMPI and a dynamic load-balancing scheme, which demonstrates very low latencies by means of double-buffered, multi-threaded queues.


Compute Tomography Data Dictionary Entry Compute Tomography Slice Work Item Heterogeneous Cluster 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ghosh, P., Mitchell, M.: Segmentation of medical images using a genetic algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, GECCO 2006, pp. 1171–1178. ACM, New York (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jolliffe, I.T.: Principal Component Analysis. Springer, New York (2002)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lai, C.C., Chang, C.Y.: A hierarchical evolutionary algorithm for automatic medical image segmentation. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(1), 248–259 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Petkov, N.: Biologically motivated computationally intensive approaches to image pattern recognition. Future Generation Computer Systems 11(4-5), 451–465 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pinto, N., Doukhan, D., DiCarlo, J.J., Cox, D.D.: A high-throughput screening approach to discovering good forms of biologically inspired visual representation. PLoS Comput. Biol. 5(11), e1000579 (2009), MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Johnson, M., Shotton, J.: Semantic Texton Forests. In: Cipolla, R., Battiato, S., Farinella, G.M. (eds.) Computer Vision. SCI, vol. 285, pp. 173–203. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Touhami, W., Boukerroui, D., Cocquerez, J.P.: Fully Automatic Kidneys Detection in 2D CT Images: A Statistical Approach. In: Duncan, J., Gerig, G. (eds.) MICCAI 2005. LNCS, vol. 3749, pp. 262–269. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Turk, M., Pentland, A.: Eigenfaces for Recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 3(1), 71–86 (1991), CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Weber, R.: Similarity Search in High-Dimensional Data Spaces. Ph.D. thesis, Grundlagen von Datenbanken (1998)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zinterhof, P.: Distributed Computation of Feature-Detectors for Medical Image Processing on GPGPU and Cell Processors. In: Guarracino, M.R., Vivien, F., Träff, J.L., Cannatoro, M., Danelutto, M., Hast, A., Perla, F., Knüpfer, A., Di Martino, B., Alexander, M. (eds.) Euro-Par-Workshop 2010. LNCS, vol. 6586, pp. 339–347. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Zinterhof
    • 1
  1. 1.Salzburg UniversityAustria

Personalised recommendations