Advertisement

Time and Exceptional Behavior in Multiparty Structured Interactions

  • Hugo A. López
  • Jorge A. Pérez
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7176)

Abstract

The Conversation Calculus (CC) is a model of multiparty interactions which extends the π-calculus with the notion of conversation—a possibly distributed medium in which participants may communicate. Here we study the interplay of time and exceptional behavior for models of structured communications based on conversations. We propose C3, a timed variant of the CC in which conversations feature both standard and exceptional behavior. The exceptional behavior may be triggered either by the passing of time (a timeout) or by an explicit signal for conversation abortion. By presenting a compelling example from a healthcare scenario, we argue that the combination of time and exceptional behavior leads to more meaningful models of structured communications.

Keywords

Social Worker Label Transition System Exception Handling Conversation Context Business Process Modeling Notation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Berger, M., Honda, K.: The two-phase commitment protocol in an extended pi-calculus. Electr. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 39(1) (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berger, M., Yoshida, N.: Timed, Distributed, Probabilistic, Typed Processes. In: Shao, Z. (ed.) APLAS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4807, pp. 158–174. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bravetti, M., Zavattaro, G.: On the expressive power of process interruption and compensation. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science 19(3), 565–599 (2009)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Caires, L., Ferreira, C., Vieira, H.: A Process Calculus Analysis of Compensations. In: Kaklamanis, C., Nielson, F. (eds.) TGC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5474, pp. 87–103. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Caires, L., Vieira, H.T.: Conversation types. Theor. Comput. Sci. 411(51-52), 4399–4440 (2010)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Campadello, S., Compagna, L., Gidoin, D., Holtmanns, S., Meduri, V., Pazzaglia, J., Seguran, M., Thomas, R.: Scenario Selection and Definition. Research report A7.D1.1, SERENITY consortium (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Capecchi, S., Giachino, E., Yoshida, N.: Global Escape in Multiparty Sessions. In: Lodaya, K., Mahajan, M. (eds.) FSTTCS 2010. LIPIcs, vol. 8, pp. 338–351. Schloss Dagstuhl–Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, Dagstuhl (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carbone, M.: Session-based choreography with exceptions. In: PLACES 2008. ENTCS, vol. 241, pp. 35–55 (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carbone, M., Honda, K., Yoshida, N.: Structured Communication-Centred Programming for Web Services. In: De Nicola, R. (ed.) ESOP 2007. LNCS, vol. 4421, pp. 2–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Carbone, M., Honda, K., Yoshida, N.: Structured Interactional Exceptions in Session Types. In: van Breugel, F., Chechik, M. (eds.) CONCUR 2008. LNCS, vol. 5201, pp. 402–417. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ferreira, C., Lanese, I., Ravara, A., Vieira, H.T., Zavattaro, G.: Advanced Mechanisms for Service Combination and Transactions. In: Wirsing, M., Hölzl, M. (eds.) SENSORIA. LNCS, vol. 6582, pp. 302–325. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Honda, K., Vasconcelos, V.T., Kubo, M.: Language Primitives and Type Discipline for Structured Communication-Based Programming. In: Hankin, C. (ed.) ESOP 1998. LNCS, vol. 1381, pp. 122–138. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lanese, I., Vaz, C., Ferreira, C.: On the Expressive Power of Primitives for Compensation Handling. In: Gordon, A.D. (ed.) ESOP 2010. LNCS, vol. 6012, pp. 366–386. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Laneve, C., Zavattaro, G.: Foundations of Web Transactions. In: Sassone, V. (ed.) FOSSACS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3441, pp. 282–298. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lapadula, A., Pugliese, R., Tiezzi, F.: A Calculus for Orchestration of Web Services. In: De Nicola, R. (ed.) ESOP 2007. LNCS, vol. 4421, pp. 33–47. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lapadula, A., Pugliese, R., Tiezzi, F.: C-clock-WS: A Timed Service-Oriented Calculus. In: Jones, C.B., Liu, Z., Woodcock, J. (eds.) ICTAC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4711, pp. 275–290. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    López, H.A.: Foundations of Communication-Centred Programming. PhD thesis, IT University of Copenhagen (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    López, H.A., Massacci, F., Zannone, N.: Goal-Equivalent Secure Business Process Re-engineering. In: Di Nitto, E., Ripeanu, M. (eds.) ICSOC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4907, pp. 212–223. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    López, H.A., Olarte, C., Pérez, J.A.: Towards a unified framework for declarative structured communications. In: PLACES. EPTCS, vol. 17, pp. 1–15 (2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lyng, K.M., Hildebrandt, T., Mukkamala, R.R.: From Paper Based Clinical Practice Guidelines to Declarative Workflow Management. In: Ardagna, D., Mecella, M., Yang, J. (eds.) BPM Workshops. LNBIP, vol. 17, pp. 336–347. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Milner, R., Parrow, J., Walker, D.: A calculus of mobile processes, parts I and II. Journal of Information and Computation 100, 1–77 (1992)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rittenberger, J.C., Bost, J.E., Menegazzi, J.J.: Time to give the first medication during resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 70(2), 201–206 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vieira, H.T.: A Calculus for Modeling and Analyzing Conversations in Service-Oriented Computing. PhD thesis, Universidade Nova de Lisboa (2010)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vieira, H.T., Caires, L., Seco, J.C.: The Conversation Calculus: A Model of Service-Oriented Computation. In: Gairing, M. (ed.) ESOP 2008. LNCS, vol. 4960, pp. 269–283. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wehrman, I., Kitchin, D., Cook, W.R., Misra, J.: A timed semantics of orc. Theor. Comput. Sci. 402(2-3), 234–248 (2008)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Xu, J., Romanovsky, A.B., Randell, B.: Coordinated exception handling in distributed object systems: From model to system implementation. In: ICDCS, pp. 12–21 (1998)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hongli, Y., Xiangpeng, Z., Chao, C., Zongyan, Q.: Exploring the Connection of Choreography and Orchestration with Exception Handling and Finalization/Compensation. In: Derrick, J., Vain, J. (eds.) FORTE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4574, pp. 81–96. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hugo A. López
    • 1
  • Jorge A. Pérez
    • 2
  1. 1.PLS, IT University of CopenhagenDenmark
  2. 2.CITI - Departamento de InformáticaFCT - New University of LisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations