Advertisement

A Three Step Procedure to Enrich Augmented Reality Games with CityGML 3D Semantic Modeling

  • Alborz Zamyadi
  • Jacynthe Pouliot
  • Yvan Bédard
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography book series (LNGC)

Abstract

3D representations have been recognized as an essential component of Augmented Reality (AR) oriented applications. However, not many examples of AR-oriented applications employ structured 3D data models despite the existence of standard 3D information models like CityGML. One of the reasons for this shortcoming can be explained by lack of a semantic-based modeling method for enriching AR-oriented data models with 3D features. Therefore, a three step procedure is proposed to address this limitation as (1) back-ward engineering of an AR-oriented application to its current data model, (2) enriching the current data model with 3D features, (3) and mapping the enriched model to a standard 3D information model. A notable contribution of this work is that the procedure of data modeling has been subject to the UModelAR meta-model which has brought a complementary standpoint to the employment of 3D geospatial modeling in AR environments. Furthermore, the 3D enriched data model has been mapped to CityGML information model with CityGML Application Domain Extension (ADE) concept. To demonstrate the feasibility of this approach, an operating mobile AR-oriented game has been used for the case study.

Keywords

Augmented reality 3D model Semantic CityGML Application domain extension (ADE) 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was done part of GeoEduc3D project, a research initiative funded by the Canadian Network of Excellence—GEOIDE (GEOmatics for Informed Decisions). Accordingly we wish to thank all scientific and industrial partners, the Geomatics Department and Centre de Recherche en Géomatique (CRG) at Laval University for their supports. We also thank Thomas Butzbach from the developers of the Energy War mobile game for helping us with procedure of back-ward-engineering.

References

  1. Azuma R (1997) A survey of augmented reality. Tele-operators Virtual Environ 6:355–385Google Scholar
  2. Badard T (2006) Geospatial service oriented architectures for mobile augmented reality. In: Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on mobile geospatial augmented reality, Banff, Canada, pp 73–77Google Scholar
  3. Caplat G (2008) Modèles & métamodèles. Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes, FranceGoogle Scholar
  4. De Souza e Silva A (2009) Hybrid reality and location based gaming: redefining mobility and game spaces in urban environments. J Simul Gaming 40:404–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dollner J, Baumann K, Buchholz H (2006) Virtual 3D city models as foundation of complex urban information spaces. In: Proceedings of CORP 2006 and Geomultimedia 06, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  6. Dumont M-A, Power MT, Barma S (2011) GéoÉduc3D: Évolution des jeux sérieux vers la mobilité et la réalité augmentée au service de l’apprentissage en science et technologie. Can J Learn Technol 37:2Google Scholar
  7. Harrap R, Daniel S (2009) Mobile LIDAR mapping: building the next generation of outdoor environment model for augmented reality. In: IEEE international symposium on mixed and augmented reality (ISMAR), Let’s go out workshop, Orlando, Florida, USA. Available at: https://www.icg.tugraz.at/~reitmayr/lgo/harrap_lidar.pdf
  8. Hasse K, Koch R (2010) Extension of electronical nautical charts for 3D interactive visualization via CityGML. In: Proceedings of GeoInformatik 2010, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  9. Hollerer T, Feiner S (2004) Mobile augmented reality (Chapter nine). In: Karimi H, Hammed A (eds) Telegeoinformatics: Location-Based Computing and Services. Taylor & Francis books ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Kolbe TH, Gröger G, Plümer L (2008) CityGML—3D city models and their potential for emergency response. In: Geospatial information technology for emergency response. Taylor & Francis Group, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Kolbe TH, Gröger G, Plümer L (2005) CityGML—Interoperable access to 3D city models. In: Van Oosterom P, Zlatanova S, Fendel E M (eds) Proceedings of the international symposium on geo information for disaster management. Springer, pp 883–899Google Scholar
  12. Lee W, Park J (2005) Augmented foam: a tangible augmented reality for product design. In: Proceedings of 4th IEEE and ACM international symposium on mixed and augmented reality. Vienna, Austria, pp 106–109Google Scholar
  13. Liestol G (2009) Situated simulations: a prototyped augmented reality genre for learning on the iPhone. Int J Interact mobile Technol 3:24–28Google Scholar
  14. Milgram P, Takemura H, Utsumi A, Kishino F (1994) Augmented reality: a class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum. In: Proceedings of telemanipulator and telepresence technologies, vol 2351. pp 282–292Google Scholar
  15. Oda O, S Feiner (2010) Rolling and shooting: two augmented reality games. In: Proceedings of the 28th international conference on human factors in computing systems. Atlanta, USA, pp 3041–3044Google Scholar
  16. OGC 08-007rl (2008) OpenGIS® city geography markup language (CityGML) encoding standard. Groger G, Kolbe TH, Czerwinski A, Nagel C (eds) Open Geospatial Consortium IncGoogle Scholar
  17. Reitmayr G, Schmalstieg D (2003) Data management strategies for mobile augmented reality. In: Proceedings of international workshop on software technology for augmented reality systems (STARS). Tokyo, Japan, pp 47–52Google Scholar
  18. Schall G, Mendez E, Kruijff E, Veas E, Junghanns S, Reitinger B, Schmalstieg D (2009) Handeheld augmented reality for underground infrastructure visualization. Pers Ubiquit Comput 13:281–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schall G, Mendez E, Junghanns S, Schmalstieg D (2007a) Urban 3d models: what’s underneath? Handheld augmented reality for subsurface infrastructure visualization. In: Proceedings of Ubicomp 2007. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  20. Schall G, Junghanns S, Mendes E, Schmalstieg D, Reitinger B (2007b) Handheld geospatial augmented reality using urban 3d models. In: Proceedings of the workshop on mobile spatial interaction, ACM international conference on human factors in computing systems, San Jose, USAGoogle Scholar
  21. Stadler A, Nagel C, König G, Kolbe TH (2009) Making interoperability persistent: a 3D geo database based on CityGML. In: Jiyeong L, Zlatanova S (eds) Lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography. Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on 3D geo-information, Seoul, Korea, pp 175–192Google Scholar
  22. Thomas V, Daniel S, Pouliot J (2010) 3d modeling for mobile augmented reality in unprepared environment. In: Kolbe TH, Koing G, Nagel C (eds) Proceedings of 5th international 3D GeoInfo conference, Berlin, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  23. Vanclooster A, Maeyer PD, Fack V (2009) Implementation of indoor navigation networks using CityGML. In: Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on 3D Geo-Information, Ghent, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  24. Wojciechowski R, Walczak K, White M, Cellary W (2004) Building virtual and augmented reality museum exhibitions. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on 3D web technology, Monterey, USA, pp 135–144Google Scholar
  25. Woodward C, Hakkarainen M, Rainio K (2010) Mobile augmented reality for building and construction: software architecture. In: Proceedings of mobile AR Summit at the 9th IEEE international symposium on mixed and augmented reality, Seoul, KoreaGoogle Scholar
  26. Yang J, Maurer F (2010) Literature survey on combining digital tables and augmented reality for interacting with model of human body. Technical report. University of Calgary, Calgary, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  27. Zamyadi A, Pouliot J, Bédard Y (2011) Improving the interoperability of 3D models among augmented reality systems: Proposal for a meta-model. In: Proceedings of the joint ISPRS workshop on 3D city modelling and applications and the 6th 3D GeoInfo Conference. In: The China academic journals electronic magazine. Wuhan, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  28. Zlatanova S, Van Den Heuvel FA (2001) 3D city modeling for mobile augmented reality. In: Proceedings of CIPA 2001 symposium, Potsdam, GermanyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alborz Zamyadi
    • 1
  • Jacynthe Pouliot
    • 1
  • Yvan Bédard
    • 1
  1. 1.Département des Sciences GéomatiquesUniversité LavalQuébec CityCanada

Personalised recommendations