Advertisement

Modeling the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) in OWL

  • Manuel Möller
  • Daniel Sonntag
  • Patrick Ernst
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 272)

Abstract

Current efforts in healthcare focus on establishing interoperability and data integration of medical resources for better collaboration between medical personal and doctors, especially in the patient treatment process. In covering human diseases, one of the major international standards in clinical practice is the International Classification for Diseases (ICD), maintained by the World Health Organization (WHO). Several country- and language-specific adaptations exist which share the general structure of the WHO version but differ in certain details. This complicates the exchange of patient records and hampers data integration across language borders. We present our approach for modeling the hierarchy of the ICD-10 using the Web Ontology Language (OWL). OWL, which we will introduce shortly, should provide a formal ontological basis for ICD-10 with enough expressivity to model interoperability and data integration of several medical resources such as ICD. Our resulting model captures the hierarchical information of the ICD-10 as well as comprehensive class labels for English and German. Specialities such as “Exclusion” statements, which make statements about the disjointness of certain ICD-10 categories, are modeled in a formal way. For properties which exceed the expressivity of OWL-DL, we provide a separate OWL-Full component which allows us to use the hierarchical knowledge and class labels with existing OWL-DL reasoners and capture the additional information in a Semantic Web format.

Keywords

Merging Process Formal Ontological Basis Nutritional Anaemia Super Class Hierarchical Knowledge 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bechhofer, S., Volz, R., Lord, P.: Cooking the Semantic Web with the OWL API. In: Fensel, D., Sycara, K., Mylopoulos, J. (eds.) ISWC 2003. LNCS, vol. 2870, pp. 659–675. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bodenreider, O.: The Unified Medical Language System (UMLS): Integrating biomedical terminology. Nucleic Acids Research 32(Database Issue), D267–D270 (2004), http://nar.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/32/suppl_1/D267 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cardillo, E., Eccher, C., Serafini, L., Tamilin, A.: Logical Analysis of Mappings Between Medical Classification Systems. In: Dochev, D., Pistore, M., Traverso, P. (eds.) AIMSA 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5253, pp. 311–321. Springer, Heidelberg (2008), http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/aimsa/aimsa2008.html#CardilloEST08 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ceusters, W., Smith, B., Kumar, A., Dhaen, C.: Mistakes in medical ontologies: where do they come from and how can they be detected? Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 102, 145–163 (2004), http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15853269 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cote, R., Rothwell, D., Palotay, J., Beckett, R., Brochu, L.: The systematized nomenclature of human and veterinary medicine. Tech. rep., SNOMED International. College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL (1993)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deutsche Krankenhausgesellschaft: Deutsche kodierrichtlinien - allgemeine und spezielle kodierrichtlinien für die verschlüsselung von krankheiten und prozeduren. Tech. rep., Institut für das Entgeltsystem im Krankenhaus, InEK GmbH (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fallside, D.C., Walmsley, P.: XML Schema Part 0: Primer Second Edition. W3C Recommendation, October 28 (2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-0/
  8. 8.
    Hoelzer, S., Schweiger, R.K., Liu, R., Rudolf, D., Rieger, J., Dudeck, J.: Xml representation of hierarchical classification systems: from conceptual models to real applications. In: Proc. AMIA Symp., pp. 330–334 (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hustadt, U., Motik, B., Sattler, U.: Reducing SHIQ- Description Logic to Disjunctive Datalog Programs. In: Proc. of the 9th International Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2004), Whistler, Canada, pp. 152–162 (June 2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lenz, R.: Information management in distributed healthcare networks. Data Management In a Connected World 3551, 315–334 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Möller, M., Mukherjee, S.: Context-Driven Ontological Annotations in DICOM Images – Towards Semantic PACS. In: Azevedo, L., Londral, A.R. (eds.) Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Health Informatics, HEALTHINF, pp. 294–299. INSTICC Press (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Möller, M., Sintek, M., Buitelaar, P., Mukherjee, S., Zhou, X.S., Freund, J.: Medical image understanding through the integration of cross-modal object recognition with formal domain knowledge. In: Proc. of HEALTHINF 2008, Funchal, Madeira, Portugal, vol. 1, pp. 134–141 (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Noy, N.F., Rubin, D.L.: Translating the Foundational Model of Anatomy into OWL. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 6(2), 133–136 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schulz, S., Suntisrivaraporn, B., Baader, F.: SNOMED CT’s problem list: Ontologists’ and logicians’ therapy suggestions. In: Proc. of The Medinfo 2007 Congress. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics (SHTI-series). IOS Press (2007), http://lat.inf.tu-dresden.de/research/papers/2007/SchSunBaa-Medinfo-07.pdf
  15. 15.
    Schulz, S., Suntisrivaraporn, B., Baader, F., Boeker, M.: SNOMED reaching its adolescence: Ontologists’ and logicians’ health check. International Journal of Medical Informatics 78(Supplement 1), S86–S94 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sirin, E., Parsia, B., Grau, B., Kalyanpur, A., Katz, Y.: Pellet: A practical owl-dl reasoner. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 5(2), 51–53 (2007), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2007.03.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sonntag, D.: Ontologies and Adaptivity in Dialogue for Question Answering. AKA and IOS Press, Heidelberg (2010)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sonntag, D., Wennerberg, P., Buitelaar, P., Zillner, S.: Pillars of ontology treatment in the medical domain. Journal of Cases on Information Technology (JCIT) 11(4), 47–73 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wennerberg, P.: Aligning medical domain ontologies for clinical query extraction. In: Proc. of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Student Research Workshop (EACL 2009), pp. 79–87. Association for Computational Linguistics, Morristown (2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wennerberg, P., Möller, M., Zillner, S.: A linguistic approach to aligning representations of human anatomy and radiology. In: Proc. of the International Conference on Biomedical Ontologies, ICBO 2009 (July 2009), http://precedings.nature.com/documents/3521/version/2
  21. 21.
    WHO: International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems. Tech. rep., World Health Organization (2004), http://www.who.int/classifications

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manuel Möller
    • 1
  • Daniel Sonntag
    • 1
  • Patrick Ernst
    • 1
  1. 1.German Research Center for AI (DFKI)SaarbrückenGermany

Personalised recommendations