Strengthening the Role of Public Transport

  • Danang Parikesit
  • Bambang Susantono
Chapter
Part of the Transportation Research, Economics and Policy book series (TRES)

Abstract

Public transport plays undisputable importance and role in Asian megacities: on its own rights as basic modes for the majority of users with minimum economic, social, and environmental cost. As discussed in Chap. 5, the strategic role for public transport is to complement policies targeted for better road traffic mobility. That is, public transport is indispensable to ensure smooth mobility of road traffic—interest of private mode. This is mainly due to the limited road infrastructure in Asian megacities for impending travel demand. This also makes the apparent dichotomy of private mode versus public mode disappear. As such, we need to explore for more effective framework that offers complementary role of both private and public modes.

Keywords

Public Transport Public Transport System Asian City Light Rail Transit Urban Public Transport 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Acharya SR, Morichi S (2007) Motorization and role of mass rapid transit in East Asian megacities. IATSS Res 31(2):6Google Scholar
  2. Barter P, Kenworthy J, Laube F (2003) Lessons from Asia on sustainable urban transport. In: Low NP, Gleeson BJ (eds) Making urban transport sustainable. Palgrave-Macmillan, UK, pp 252–270Google Scholar
  3. Cervero R (1997) Para-transit in America. Praeger Publisher, Westport, CTGoogle Scholar
  4. Cervero R (2000) Informal transport: mobility options for the developing world. A report for UNCHS, Nairobi, KenyaGoogle Scholar
  5. Chinh T Van (2007) Development planning for metro system in Ho Chi Minh City. Discussion paper for STREAM workshop, Dalian, 29 Oct 2007Google Scholar
  6. Daniere A (1998) Sustainable urbanization in megacities: the role of non motorized transport. Transportation Research Board Meeting, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  7. Dimitriou HT (1995) A developmental approach to urban transport planning. Avebury, Brookfield, USAGoogle Scholar
  8. Feng CM (2006) Sustainable urban transit strategies for Taipei City. In: Seminar proceeding: transportation options for megacities: opportunities and challenges for policy makers, The Indonesia Transport Society, Jakarta, 11 Dec 2006Google Scholar
  9. Feng CM, Yi JS, Shiaw-shyan LUO (2007) Case study of sustainable transport for East Asian megacities (STREAM)–urban transport in Taipei. In: Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, vol 6, DalianGoogle Scholar
  10. Fwa TF (2002) GEF STAP meeting presentation, NairobiGoogle Scholar
  11. GTZ (2002) Sustainable transport: a sourcebook for policy makers in developing cities. Module 3a, Mass transit options, GTZ, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  12. Hanaoka S (2007) Review of urban transport policy and its impact in Bangkok. In: Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, vol 6Google Scholar
  13. Hook W (2006) Financing BRT in China, BAQ 2006 Conference, YogyakartaGoogle Scholar
  14. IEA (2002) Bus system for the future. International Energy Agency, ParisGoogle Scholar
  15. Marler NW (1982) The performance of high-flow bus lanes in Bangkok. TRL report SR 723, CrowthorneGoogle Scholar
  16. Matsumoto N (2007) Analysis of policy process to introduce BRT system in Asian cities from the perspective of lesson-drawing: Cases of Jakarta, Seoul and Beijing. Air pollution control in the transportation sector, third phase research report, IGES, Hayama, JapanGoogle Scholar
  17. Morichi S (2005) Long-term strategy for transport system in Asian megacities. J Eastern Asia Soc Transp Stud 6:1–22Google Scholar
  18. Morichi S, Acharya SR (2007) New perspectives on urban transport policies for East Asian megacities. In: Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, vol 6, DalianGoogle Scholar
  19. Pan H (2007) Case study of sustainable transport for East Asian megacities–urban transport in Shanghai. In: Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, vol 6, DalianGoogle Scholar
  20. Parikesit D, Susantono B (2007) Challenges for sustainable mobility in megacities: a case of Greater Jakarta. Unpublished IRG STREAM interim report, The Indonesian Transport Society, JakartaGoogle Scholar
  21. Rodrigue JP, Comtois C, Slack B (2009) The geography of transport systems. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Shimazaki T, Rahman A (1995) Operational characterisics of paratransit in developing countries Asia. Transp Res Rec 1503:49–56Google Scholar
  23. Susantono B (1998) Transportation and land use dynamics in metropolitan Jakarta. Berkeley Plan J 12(1997–1998):126–144Google Scholar
  24. Susantono B (1999) Survey of informal transport in Jakarta. Unpublished survey and analysisGoogle Scholar
  25. Tiglao CCN, Ildefonso TP Jr (2007) Issues and directions on integrated public transport in Metro Manila. In: Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, vol 6, DalianGoogle Scholar
  26. Union International des Transports Publics (2001) Millennium city database for sustainable mobility (CD-ROM). UITP, Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  27. Vuchic VR (2005) Light rail and BRT: competitive or complementary. Public Transp Int 5:10–13Google Scholar
  28. Vuchic VR (2007) Urban transit: system and technology. Wiley, Hoboken, NJCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Danang Parikesit
    • 1
  • Bambang Susantono
    • 2
  1. 1.Universitas Gadjah Mada (UGM)YogyakartaIndonesia
  2. 2.Ministry of TransportationJakartaIndonesia

Personalised recommendations