Abstract
When computer-assisted surgery was introduced in the early 1990s, the interest of orthopedic specialists was first focused on robotics. In 1995, when we started with computer navigation for the placement of pedicle screws at Ruhr University Bochum, no-one could imagine that this method would gain entry into orthopedic theaters. It involved timeconsuming planning and required preoperative computed tomography (CT); moreover, pairedpoint and surface matching during the operation was difficult for the surgeon (◘ Fig. 1.1).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baumbach JA (2012) 10-Jahres-Ergebnisse hinsichtlich Lockerungsrate navigierter versus nicht navigierter Knietotalendoprothesen Typ Aesculap Search aus dem Jahr 1999 Inaugural-Dissertation Ruhr Universität Bochum; vorab publiziert. Int. CAOS-meeting Seoul 2012
Beck M, Moritz K, Gierer P, Gradl G, Harms C, Mittlmeier T (2009) Intraoperative control of pedicle screws using 3-d fluoroscopy. A prospective study in the treatment of thorakolumbar fractures. Z Orthop 147:37–42
Bellemans J (2009) Navigation and CAS: is D-Day approaching? Knee Surg Sports Arthrosc 17:1141–1142
Haaker RG, Stockheim M, Kamp M, Proff G, Breitenfelder J, Ottersbach A (2005) Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 433 152–159
Haaker RG, Tiedjen K, Ottersbach A, Rubenthaler F, Stockheim M, Stiehl JB (2007) Comparison of conventional versus computer – navigated acetabular component insertion. J Arthroplasty 22:151–160
Haaker RG, Tiedjen K, Rubenthaler F, Stockheim M (2003) Computerassistierte Hüftpfannennavigation bei primär und sekundär dysplastischen Ausgangssituationen. Z Orthop 141:105–112
Haaker R, Wojciechowski M, Patzer P, Willburger RE, Senkal M, Engelhardt M (2007) Minimally invasive unicondylar knee replacement with computer navigation. Orthopaede 35:1073–1080
Ottersbach A, Haaker R (2005) Optimization of cup positioning in THA – comparison between conventional mechanical instrumentation and computer-assisted implanted cups by using the Orthopilot navigation system. Z Orthop 143:611–615
Portheine F, Ohnsorge J, Schkommodau E, Radermacher K (2002) CT-basierte Planung und DISOS-Schablonennavigation in der Kniegelenkendoprothetik. In: Konermann W, Haaker R (eds) Navigation und Robotik in der Gelenk- und Wirbelsäulenchirurgie. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 262–272
Victor J, Van Doninck D, Labey L, Innocenti B, Parizel PM, Bellemans (2009) How precise can bony landmarks be determined on a CT scan of the knee? Knee 16:358–365
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Haaker, R. (2013). History of Computer-Assisted Surgery. In: Haaker, R., Konermann, W. (eds) Computer and Template Assisted Orthopedic Surgery. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29728-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29728-1_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-29727-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-29728-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)