Challenging Wireless Networks, an Underground Experience

  • David Palma
  • Joao Goncalves
  • Marilia Curado
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 81)

Abstract

Quite often Wireless Ad-hoc networks are taken for granted as a networking solution in the most challenging environments. Motivated by these networks’ self-X properties and the infrastructure-less paradigm, many authors rely on Ad-hoc networks to support a number of applications in remote areas or even in disaster scenarios such as mine collapses, earthquakes, tunnel accidents. However, most of these works are only simulation oriented, disregarding how challenging wireless networks can be in such scenarios. By conducting a set of performance measurements with off-the-shelf netbooks in an underground environment it is possible to see that typical wireless simulation assumptions do not verify, and that covering an area with multi-hop connectivity is not straightforward. These results motivate a tighter interaction between real experiments and future simulation based works in challenging environments which need to be more accurate.

Keywords

Wireless Sensor Network Wireless Mesh Network Link Quality Rescue Operation Optimize Link State Route 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    NLANR/DAST: Iperf - the TCP/UDP bandwidth measurement tool, http://iperf.sourceforge.net/ (accessed 2010)
  3. 3.
    Abolhasan, M., Wysocki, T., Dutkiewicz, E.: A review of routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks. Ad Hoc Networks 2(1), 1–22 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ahmed, S., Karmakar, G.C., Kamruzzaman, J.: An environment-aware mobility model for wireless ad hoc network. Computer Networks 54(9), 1470–1489 (2010)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cayirci, E., Tezcan, H., Dogan, Y., Coskun, V.: Wireless sensor networks for underwater survelliance systems. Ad Hoc Networks 4(4), 431–446 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chakeres, I., Perkins, C.: Dynamic manet on-demand (dymo) routing. Work in progress, internet-draft, Internet Engineering Task Force (July 2010), http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-manet-dymo-17.txt
  7. 7.
    Chen, G.Z., Shen, C.F., Zhou, L.J.: Design and performance analysis of wireless sensor network location node system for underground mine. Mining Science and Technology (China) 19(6), 813–818 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen, Z., Chen, L., Liu, Y., Piao, Y.: Application research of wireless mesh network on earthquake. In: International Conference on Industrial and Information Systems, IIS 2009, 24-25, pp. 19–22 (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cimmino, A., Donadio, P.: Overall requirements for global information multimedia communication village 10th strategic workshop. Wireless Personal Communications 49(3), 311–319 (2009), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11277-009-9686-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Clausen, T., Jacquet, P.: Optimized link state routing protocol (olsr). RFC 3626, Internet Engineering Task Force (October 2003), http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3626.txt
  11. 11.
    Eriksson, J., Faloutsos, M., Krishnamurthy, S.V.: Dart: Dynamic address routing for scalable ad hoc and mesh networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 15, 119–132 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gaertner, G., Cahill, V.: Understanding link quality in 802.11 mobile ad hoc networks. IEEE Internet Computing 8(1), 55–60 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Garg, V.K.: Radio propagation and propagation path-loss models. In: Wireless Communications & Networking, pp. 47–84. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gerla, M.: From battlefields to urban grids: New research challenges in ad hoc wireless networks. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 1(1), 77–93 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Khoukhi, L., Cherkaoui, S., Gaiti, D.: Managing rescue and relief operations using wireless mobile ad hoc technology, the best way? In: IEEE 34th Conference on Local Computer Networks, LCN 2009, 20-23, pp. 708–713 (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Murray, D., Dixon, M., Koziniec, T.: An experimental comparison of routing protocols in multi hop ad hoc networks. In: 2010 Australasian Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference, ATNAC, 31 (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Newport, C., Kotz, D., Yougu, Y., Gray, R.S., Jason, L., Elliott, C.: Experimental evaluation of wireless simulation assumptions. Simulation 83(9), 643–661 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nielsen, Y., Koseoglu, O.: Wireless networking in tunnelling projects. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 22(3), 252–261 (2007), http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3561.txt CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Perkins, C.E., Belding-Royer, E.M., Das, S.R.: Ad hoc on-demand distance vector (aodv) routing. RFC Experimental 3561, Internet Engineering Task Force (July 2003), http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3561.txt
  20. 20.
    Plagemann, T., Munthe-Kaas, E., Skjelsvik, K.S., Puzar, M., Goebel, V., Johansen, U., Gorman, J., Marin, S.P.: A data sharing facility for mobile ad-hoc emergency and rescue applications. In: ICDCSW 2007: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops, p. 85. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2007)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ribeiro, C., Ferworn, A., Tran, J.: An assessment of a wireless mesh network performance for urban search and rescue task. In: 2009 IEEE Toronto International Conference Science and Technology for Humanity (TIC-STH), 26-27, pp. 369–374 (2009)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sha, K., Shi, W., Watkins, O.: Using wireless sensor networks for fire rescue applications: Requirements and challenges. In: 2006 IEEE International Conference on Electro/information Technology, 7-10, pp. 239–244 (2006)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tnnesen, A., Lopatic, T., Gredler, H., Petrovitsch, B., Kaplan, A., Tcke, S.O., et al.: Olsrd - an ad-hoc wireless mesh routing daemon (July 2010), http://www.olsr.org
  24. 24.
    Wenfeng, L., Jie, G., Peng, B.: Mine multimedia emergency communication system. In: International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, WiCom 2007, 21-25, pp. 2865–2868 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Science, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Palma
    • 1
  • Joao Goncalves
    • 1
  • Marilia Curado
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Informatics EngineeringCentre for Informatics and Systems University of Coimbra (CISUC)Portugal

Personalised recommendations