An Evidential Improvement for Gender Profiling

Part of the Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing book series (AINSC, volume 164)

Abstract

CCTV systems are broadly deployed in the present world. To ensure in-time reaction for intelligent surveillance, it is a fundamental task for real-world applications to determine the gender of people of interest. However, normal video algorithms for gender profiling (usually face profiling) have three drawbacks. First, the profiling result is always uncertain. Second, for a time-lasting gender profiling algorithm, the result is not stable. The degree of certainty usually varies, sometimes even to the extent that a male is classified as a female, and vice versa. Third, for a robust profiling result in cases were a person’s face is not visible, other features, such as body shape, are required. These algorithms may provide different recognition results - at the very least, they will provide different degrees of certainties. To overcome these problems, in this paper, we introduce an evidential approach that makes use of profiling results from multiple algorithms over a period of time. Experiments show that this approach does provide better results than single profiling results and classic fusion results.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Dempster, A.P.: Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping. The Annals of Statistics 28, 325–339 (1967)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Denœux, T.: Conjunctive and disjunctive combination of belief functions induced by nondistinct bodies of evidence. Artifical Intelligence 172(2-3), 234–264 (2008)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liu, W., Miller, P., Ma, J., Yan, W.: Challenges of distributed intelligent surveillance system with heterogenous information. In: Procs. of QRASA, Pasadena, California, pp. 69–74 (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ma, J., Liu, W., Miller, P.: Event Modelling and Reasoning with Uncertain Information for Distributed Sensor Networks. In: Deshpande, A., Hunter, A. (eds.) SUM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6379, pp. 236–249. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ma, J., Liu, W., Miller, P.: Belief change with noisy sensing in the situation calculus. In: Procs. of UAI (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ma, J., Liu, W., Miller, P.: Handling Sequential Observations in Intelligent Surveillance. In: Benferhat, S., Grant, J. (eds.) SUM 2011. LNCS, vol. 6929, pp. 547–560. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ma, J., Liu, W., Miller, P., Yan, W.: Event composition with imperfect information for bus surveillance. In: Procs. of AVSS, pp. 382–387. IEEE Press (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Miller, P., Liu, W., Fowler, F., Zhou, H., Shen, J., Ma, J., Zhang, J., Yan, W., McLaughlin, K., Sezer, S.: Intelligent sensor information system for public transport: To safely go... In: Procs. of AVSS (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    ECIT Queen’s University of Belfast. Airport corridor surveillance (2010), http://www.csit.qub.ac.uk/Research/ResearchGroups/IntelligentSurveillanceSystems
  10. 10.
    Gardiner Security. Glasgow transforms bus security with ip video surveillance, http://www.ipusergroup.com/doc-upload/Gardiner-Glasgowbuses.pdf
  11. 11.
    Shafer, G.: A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press (1976)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Smets, P.: Non-standard logics for automated reasoning. In: Smets, P., Mamdani, A., Dubois, D., Prade, H. (eds.) Belief Functions, pp. 253–286 (1988)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhou, H., Miller, P., Zhang, J., Collins, M., Wang, H.: Gender classification using facial and full body features. Technical Report, CSIT, Queen’s University Belfast, UK (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Electronics, Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceQueen’s University BelfastBelfastUK

Personalised recommendations