Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Medial Osteoarthritis: The Basics

  • G. Deschamps
  • C. Dodd
  • P. Hernigou
  • A. Franz
  • S. Parratte
  • J. M. Aubaniac
  • Jean-Noël Argenson
  • M. Ollivier


Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is designed for patients presenting isolated degenerative unicompartmental medial or lateral femorotibial wear or wear related to aseptic osteonecrosis of the femoral condyle, most frequently medial.


Anterior Cruciate Ligament Total Knee Arthroplasty Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Femoral Component Tibial Component 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Berger R, Meneghini RM et al (2005) Results of unicompartmental arthroplasty at a minimum of 10 year follow up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87A:999–1006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cartier P, Sanouillet JL et al (1996) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty after 10-year minimum follow up period. J Arthroplasty 11:782–788PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Marmor L (1988) Unicompartmental knee, arthroplasty. Ten to 13 year follow up study. Clin Orthop 226:14PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    O’Rourke M, Gardner J et al (2005) Unicompartmental knee replacement. A minimum 21 year follow-up. End result study. Clin Orthop 440:27–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Parratte S, Argenson JN et al (2009) Medial unicompartmental knee replacement in the under 50’s. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91B:351–356Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pennington DW, Swienckowski JJ et al (2003) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients sixty years of age or younger. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85A:1968–1973Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Squire M, Callaghan J et al (1999) Unicompartmental knee replacement: a minimum 15 year follow up study. Clin Orthop 367:61PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Deshmuckh RV, Scott RD (2001) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: long term results. Clin Orthop 392:272–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Geller J, Yoon RS et al (2008) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A controversial history and a rationale for contemporary resurgence. J Knee Surg 21:7–14PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    McAllister CM (2008) The role of UKA versus TKA in providing maximal performance and satisfaction. J Knee Surg 21:286–292PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gibson PH, Goodfellow JW (1986) Stress radiography in degenerative arthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 68B:608–609Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gulati A, Pandit H et al (2009) The effect of leg alignment on the outcome of unicompartmental replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:469–474PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goodfellow J et al (2006) Unicompartmental arthroplasty with the Oxford knee. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Price AJ (2003) Medial meniscal bearing arthroplasty: wear, mechanics and clinical outcome. D Phil Thesis, University of OxfordGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Furnes O, Espehaug B et al (2007) Failure mechanisms after unicompartmental and tricompartmental primary knee replacement with cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:519–525PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smith TO, Hing CB et al (2009) Fixed versus mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacement: a meta-analysis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95:599–605PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Parratte S, Pauly V et al (2012) No long-term difference between fixed and mobile medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:61–68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bonutti PM, Dethmers DA (2008) Contemporary unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: fixed vs mobile bearing. J Arthroplasty 23(7 Suppl):24–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kretzer JP, Jakubowitz E et al (2011) Wear analysis of unicondylar mobile bearing and fixed bearing knee systems: a knee simulator study. Acta Biomater 7:710–715PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Parratte S, Pauly V et al (2010) Survival of bicompartmental knee arthroplasty at 5 to 23 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:64–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Argenson JN, Parratte S et al (2009) The new arthritic patient and arthroplasty treatment options. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(Suppl 5):43–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rolston L, Bresch J et al (2007) Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a bone-sparing, ligament-sparing, and minimally invasive alternative for active patients. Orthopedics 30:70–73PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Trompeter AJ, Gill K et al (2009) Predicting anterior cruciate ligament integrity in patients with osteoarthritis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:595–599PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Deschamps G, Lapeyre B (1987) Rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament: a frequently unrecognized cause of failure of unicompartmental knee prostheses. A propos of a series of 79 Lotus pros theses with a follow-up of more than 5 years. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 73:544–551, 1PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Komistek RD, Allain J et al (2002) In vivo kinematics for subjects with and without an anterior cruciate ligament. Clin Orthop 404:315–325PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pandit H, Beard DJ et al (2006) Combined anterior cruciate reconstruction and Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88-B:887–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Argenson JN, Chevrol-Benkeddache Y et al (2002) Modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84A:2235–2239Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Argenson JN, Komistek RD et al (2002) In vivo determination of knee kinematics for subjects implanted with a unicompartmental arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17:1049–1054PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Deschamps G, Chol Ch (2011) Fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Patients selection and operative technique. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97:648–661. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2011.08.003 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Stern SH, Becker MW et al (1993) Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. An evaluation of selection criteria. Clin Orthop 286:143–148PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    White SH, Ludkowski PF et al (1991) Anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73-B:582–586Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ESSKA 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Deschamps
  • C. Dodd
  • P. Hernigou
  • A. Franz
  • S. Parratte
  • J. M. Aubaniac
  • Jean-Noël Argenson
    • 1
  • M. Ollivier
  1. 1.Hòpital Sainte Marguerite, Service de Chirurgie OrthopédiqueMarseilleFrance

Personalised recommendations