Advertisement

Competing Risks and Survival Tree Ensemble

  • Małgorzata Krętowska
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7267)

Abstract

In the paper the ensemble of dipolar trees for analysis of competing risks is proposed. The tool is build on the base of the learning sets, which contain the data from clinical studies following patients response for a given treatment. In case of competing risks many types of response are investigated. The proposed method is able to cope with incomplete (censored) observations and as a result, for a given set of covariates and a type of event, returns the aggregated cumulative incidence function.

Keywords

Random Forest Failure Time Survival Tree Cumulative Incidence Function Single Survival Tree 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bobrowski, L., Krętowska, M., Krętowski, M.: Design of neural classifying networks by using dipolar criterions. In: Proc. of the Third Conference on Neural Networks and Their Applications, Kule, Poland, pp. 689–694 (1997)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Breiman, L.: How to use survival forest, http://stat-www.berkeley.edu/users/breiman
  3. 3.
    Callaghan, F.M.: Classification trees for survival data with competing risks, Univeristy of Pittsburgh, PhD. thesis (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hothorn, T., Lausen, B., Benner, A., Radespiel-Troger, M.: Bagging survival trees. Statistics in Medicine 23, 77–91 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hothorn, T., Buhlmann, P., Dudoit, S., Molinaro, A.M., van der Laan, M.J.: Survival ensembles. U.C. Berkeley Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series 174 (2005), http://www.bepress.com/ucbbiostat/paper174
  6. 6.
    Ibrahim, N.A., Kudus, A.: Decision tree for prognostic classification of multivariate survival data and competing risks. In: Strangio, M.A. (ed.) Recent Advances in Technologies (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Krętowska, M.: Random Forest of Dipolar Trees for Survival Prediction. In: Rutkowski, L., Tadeusiewicz, R., Zadeh, L.A., Żurada, J.M. (eds.) ICAISC 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4029, pp. 909–918. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Krętowska, M.: Ensembles of dipolar trees for prediction of survival time. Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering 27(3), 67–75 (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pintilie, M.: Competing Risks: A Practical Perspective. John Willey & Sons (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Putter, H., Fiocco, M., Geskus, R.B.: Tutorial in biostatistics: Competing risks and multi-stage models. Statistics in Medicine 26, 2389–2430 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ridgeway, G.: The state of boosting. Computing Science and Statistics 31, 1722–1731 (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Małgorzata Krętowska
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Computer ScienceBialystok University of TechnologyBiałystokPoland

Personalised recommendations