Generalization Capability of Artificial Neural Network Incorporated with Pruning Method

  • Siddhaling Urolagin
  • Prema K.V.
  • N. V. Subba Reddy
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7135)


In any real world application, the performance of Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) is mostly depends upon its generalization capability. Generalization of the ANN is ability to handle unseen data. The generalization capability of the network is mostly determined by system complexity and training of the network. Poor generalization is observed when the network is over-trained or system complexity (or degree of freedom) is relatively more than the training data. A smaller network which can fit the data will have the k good generalization ability. Network parameter pruning is one of the promising methods to reduce the degree of freedom of a network and hence improve its generalization. In recent years various pruning methods have been developed and found effective in real world applications. Next, it is important to estimate the improvement in generalization and rate of improvement as pruning being incorporated in the network. A method is developed in this research to evaluate generalization capability and rate of convergence towards the generalization. Using the proposed method, experiments have been conducted to evaluate Multi-Layer Perceptron neural network with pruning being incorporated for handwritten numeral recognition.


Neural network pruning generalization capability rate of generalization 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Blumer, A., Ehrenfeucht, A., Hausseler, D., Warmuth, M.: Learnability and the Vapnik-Chervonenkis dimension. J. Ass. Comput. Mach. 36(4), 929–965 (1989)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lawrence, S., Giles, C.L., Tsoi, A.C.: What Size Neural Network Gives Optimal Generalization? Convergence Properties of Back propagation. Technical Report, UMIACS-TR-96-22 and CS-TR-3617, Institute for Advanced Computer Studies University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 (1996)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lawrence, S., Giles, L.C.: Overfitting and Neural Networks: Conjugate Gradient and Backpropagation. In: IEEE IJCNN, Italy, CA, July 24-27, pp. 114–119 (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Reed, R.: Pruning Algorithms- A Survey. IEEE Trans. on Neural Network 4(5), 740–749 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cun, Y.L., Denker, J.S., Solla, S.A.: Optima Brain Damage. In: Denver (ed.) Advances in Neural Information Processing (2), pp. 598–605 (1989/1990); D.S. TouretzkyGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hassibi, B., Stork, D.G.: Second-order derivatives for network pruning: Optimal Brain Surgeon. Advances in Neural Information Processing System 5, 164–171 (1993)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Karnin, E.D.: A Simple Procedure for Pruning Back-Propagation Trained Neural Networks. IEEE Transaction on Neural Network 1(2), 239–245 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kavzoglu, T., Mather, P.M.: Assessing Artificial Neural Network Pruning Algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference and Exhibition of the Remote Sensing Society, Greenwich, UK, pp. 603–609 (1998)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kavzoglu, T., Vieria, C.A.O.: An Analysis of Artificial Neural Network Pruning Algorithms in Relation to Land Cover Classification Accuracy. In: Proceedings of the Remote Sensing Society Student Conference, Oxford, UK, pp. 53–58 (1998)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Giorgio, C., Guariso, G.: An application of pruning in the design of neural networks for real time flood forecasting. J. Neural Comp. and Appl. 14(1), 66–77 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Galerne, P., Yao, G.K.: Burel: New Neural Network Pruning and its application to sonar Imagery. In: Conference IEEE-CESA 1998 (1998)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kenji, S., Horiba, I., Sugie, N.: A Simple Neural Network Pruning Algorithm with Application to Filter Synthesis. Neural Processing Letters 13(1), 43–53 (2001)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vapnik, V.N.: Estimation of Dependencies Based on Empirical Data. Springer, Berlin (1982)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bengio, Y.: Neural Networks for Speech and Sequence Recognition. Thomson (1996)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Urolagin, S., Prema, K.V., Reddy, N.V.S.: Applying bottom up neural engineering approach to handwritten number recognition. In: International Conference on Cognition and Recognition, India, December 22-23, pp. 469–476 (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Siddhaling Urolagin
    • 1
  • Prema K.V.
    • 2
  • N. V. Subba Reddy
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science & EngineeringManipal Institute of TechnologyManipalIndia
  2. 2.Mody Institute of Technology and ScienceIndia

Personalised recommendations