Advertisement

Incentives for Risk Reporting with Potential Market Entrants

  • Anne Chwolka
  • Nicole Kusemitsch
Conference paper
Part of the Operations Research Proceedings book series (ORP)

Abstract

We analyze a situation in which an incumbent firm, endowed with private information about a risk factor in its market, can credibly disclose quantitative risk information to the market and, thus, also to its opponents. Favorable information increases the market price of the firm, but it may also induce the opponent to enter the market, which imposes a proprietary cost on the firm. We show that there exist partial-disclosure equilibria with two distinct nondisclosure intervals. If the firm does not disclose, the opponent will not enter the market. We conclude that one reason for the empirically observed lack of quantitative risk disclosure is the fact that firms are required to explain the underlying assumptions and models that they use to measure the risk, which can lead to important competitive disadvantages.

Keywords

Market Price Credit Rating Risk Information Market Entrance Voluntary Disclosure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Casson, M.: Entrepreneurship and the theory of the firm, J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 58, 327–348 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chwolka, A., Kusemitsch, N.: Auswirkungen einer zunehmenden Regulierung auf die Qualität der Risikoberichterstattung, 2010, FEMM Working Paper No. 15, University of Magdeburg, July (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Darrough, M.N., Stoughton, N.M.: Financial Disclosure Policies in an Entry Game. J. Account. Econ. 12, 219–243 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Feltham, G.A., Xie, J.Z.: Voluntary financial disclosure in an entry game with continua of types. Contemp. Account. Res. 9, 46–80 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Newman, P., Sansing, R.: Disclosure Policies with Multiple Users. J. Account. Res. 31, 92–112 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Suijs, J.: Voluntary Disclosure of Bad News. J. Bus. Finan. Account. 32, 1423–1435 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wagenhofer, A.: Voluntary disclosure with a strategic opponent. J. Account. Econ. 12, 341–363 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics and ManagementOtto-von-Guericke University MagdeburgMagdeburgGermany

Personalised recommendations