Skip to main content

Computing with Infinite Argumentation Frameworks: The Case of AFRAs

  • Conference paper
Theorie and Applications of Formal Argumentation (TAFA 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7132))

Abstract

In recent years a large corpus of studies has arisen from Dung’s seminal abstract model of argumentation, including several extensions aimed at increasing its expressiveness. Most of these works focus on the case of finite argumentation frameworks, leaving the potential practical applications of infinite frameworks largely unexplored. In the context of a recently proposed extension of Dung’s framework called AFRA (Argumentation Framework with Recursive Attacks), this paper makes a first step to fill this gap. It is shown that, under some reasonable restrictions, infinite frameworks admit a compact finite specification and that, on this basis, computational problems which are tractable for finite frameworks may preserve the same property in the infinite case. In particular we provide a polynomial-time algorithm to compute the finite representation of the (possibly infinite) grounded extension of an AFRA with infinite attacks. An example concerning the representation of a moral dilemma is introduced to illustrate and instantiate the proposal and gives a preliminary idea of its potential applicability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baroni, P., Cerutti, F., Giacomin, M., Guida, G.: An argumentation-based approach to modeling decision support contexts with what-if capabilities. In: AAAI Fall Symposium. Technical Report SS-09-06. pp. 2–7 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baroni, P., Cerutti, F., Giacomin, M., Guida, G.: AFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacks. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 51(1), 19–37 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Baroni, P., Cerutti, F., Dunne, P.E., Giacomin, M.: Automata for infinite argumentation structures. Technical Report, Department of Computer Science, University of Liverpool, UK (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barringer, H., Gabbay, D., Woods, J.: Temporal Dynamics of Support and Attack Networks: From Argumentation to Zoology. In: Hutter, D., Stephan, W. (eds.) Mechanizing Mathematical Reasoning. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2605, pp. 59–98. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Bench-Capon, T.J.M.: Persuasion in practical argument using value based argumentation frameworks. Journal of Logic and Computation 13(3), 429–448 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming, and N-person games. Artificial Intelligence 77, 321–357 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Dunne, P.E.: Computability Theory – concepts and applications. Ellis–Horwood (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dunne, P.E., Modgil, S., Bench-Capon, T.: Computation in extended argumentation frameworks. In: Proceedings of 19th European Conference on Artificial Inteligence (ECAI 2010), Lisbon, pp. 119–124 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gabbay, D., Woods, J.: More on non-cooperation in dialogue logic. Logic Journal of IGPL 9(1), 305–323 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Gabbay, D., Woods, J.: Non-cooperation in dialogue logic. Synthese 127, 161–186 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Gabbay, D.: Semantics for higher level attacks in extended argumentation frames part 1: Overview. Studia Logica 93, 357–381 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Hopcroft, J.E., Ullman, J.D.: Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation. Addison-Wesley (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Modgil, S.: Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks. Artificial Intelligence 173(9–10), 901–934 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Walton, D., Reed, C., Macagno, F.: Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge University Press, NY (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Baroni, P., Cerutti, F., Dunne, P.E., Giacomin, M. (2012). Computing with Infinite Argumentation Frameworks: The Case of AFRAs. In: Modgil, S., Oren, N., Toni, F. (eds) Theorie and Applications of Formal Argumentation. TAFA 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7132. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29184-5_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29184-5_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-29183-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-29184-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics