Evaluation of Cloud Description in General Circulation Models Using A-Train Observations

Conference paper
Part of the Springer Atmospheric Sciences book series (SPRINGERATMO)

Abstract

The representation of clouds and cloud feedbacks remain very different from one model to another, and they still constitute a major limitation to the reliability of climate change projections. It is therefore imperative to improve the representation of cloud processes in models. Until recently, the evaluation of several fundamental aspects of the cloudiness as the three-dimensional distribution of the cloud cover has been largely indirect, based on passive remote sensing satellites (e.g. ERBE, Scarab, ISCCP) which measure the TOA radiative fluxes. The A-train observations constitute exceptional tools to characterize the cloud properties. We will show that due to errors compensations, the climate models produce correct top-of the atmosphere fluxes. The A-train observations (CALIPSO, PARASOL, CERES) are used to unravel the errors compensations and to evaluate quantitatively the clouds description in various climate models using the COSP (CFMIP Observation Simulator Package) within the CFMIP (Cloud Feedback Model Intercomparison Program). A process oriented evaluation is conducted by analysing statistically the co-located A-train observations at high spatial resolution to built pictures of the cloud properties at the scale of the cloud process. This multi-instrument dataset at high spatial resolution is then used to assess the cloud parametrization in a climate model.

Keywords

Error Compensation Cloud Fraction High Cloud Cloud Feedback Cloud Property 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Thanks are due to G. Cesana for providing CALIPSO-GOCCP, A. Idelkadi for running COSP simulator and S. Bony for useful discussions. CNES and NASA are acknowledged for PARASOL and CALIPSO data. Climserv/ICARE for the computing resources used.

References

  1. Bodas-Salcedo A, Webb MJ, Bony S, Chepfer H, Dufresne J-L, Kein SA, Zhang Y, Marchand R, Haynes JM, Pincus R, John VO (2011) COSP: satellite simulation software for model assessment. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 92(8):1023–1043. doi: 10.1175/2011BAMS2856.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bony S, Dufresne J-L, Le Treut H, Morcette J-J, Senior C (2004) On dynamic and thermodynamic components of cloud changes. Clim Dyn 22:71–86. doi: 10.1007/s00382-003-0369-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bony S et al (2006) How well do we understand and evaluate climate change feedback processes? J Clim 19:3445–3482. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3819.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chepfer H, Bony S, Winker D, Cesana G, Dufresne J-L, Minnis P, Stubenrauch CJ, Zeng S (2010) The GCM-oriented CALIPSO cloud product (CALIPSO-GOCCP). J Geophys Res 115:D00H16. doi: 10.1029/2009JD012251 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dufresne J-L, Bony S (2008) An assessment of the primary sources of spread of global warming estimates from coupled atmosphere–ocean models. J Clim 21(9):5135–5144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hourdin F, Foujols M-A, Cordon F, Guemas V, Dufresne J-L, Bony S, Denvil S, Guez L, Lott F, Ghattas J, Braconnot P, Marti O, Meurdesoif Y, Bopp L (2012) Climate and sensitivity of the IPSL-CMA coupled model: impact of the LMDZ atmospheric grid configuration. Clim Dyn (submitted)Google Scholar
  7. Konsta D, Chepfer H, Dufresne J-L (2012a) A process oriented representation of tropical oceanic clouds for climate model evaluation, based on a statistical analysis of daytime A-train high spatial resolution observations. Clim Dyn (submitted)Google Scholar
  8. Konsta D, Dufresne J-L, Chepfer H, Idelkadi A, Cesana G (2012b) Evaluation of clouds simulated by the LMDZ5 GCM using A-train satellite observations (CALIPSO-PARASOL-CERES). Clim Dyn (submitted)Google Scholar
  9. Parol F, Buriez JC, Vanbauce C, Riedi J, Labonnote LC, Doutriaux-Boucher M, Vesperini M, Seze G, Couvert P, Viollier M, Breon FM (2004) Capabilities of multi-angle polarization cloud measurements from satellite: POLDER results. Adv Space Res 33:1080–1088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Soden BJ, Held IM (2006) An assessment of climate feedbacks in coupled ocean–atmosphere models. J Clim 19:3354–3360. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3799.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Webb M, Senior C, Bony S, Morcette JJ (2001) Combining ERBE and ISCCP data to assess clouds in the Hadley Center, ECMWF and LMD atmospheric climate models. Clim Dyn 17:905–922. doi: 10.1007/s003820100157 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Wielicki BA, Barkstrom BR, Harrison EF, Lee RB III, Smith GL, Cooper JE (1996) Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES): an earth observing system experiment. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77:853–868. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077<0853:CATER E>2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Winker D, Hunt W, McGill M (2007) Initial performance assessment of CALIOP. Geophys Res Lett 34:L19803. doi: 10.1029/2007GL030135 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Academy of AthensAthensGreece
  2. 2.LMD/IPSL, CNRSUniversite Pierre et Marie CurieParisFrance

Personalised recommendations