A Comparison of a Hydrological and an Energy Balance Model for Estimating Evapotranspiration of Chickpeas at Paphos (SW Cyprus) Agricultural Area

  • G. Papadavid
  • D. G. Hadjimitsis
  • S. Michaelides
  • L. Toulios
  • A. AgapiouEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Atmospheric Sciences book series (SPRINGERATMO)


The objective of this paper is to describe a methodological tool in order to improve the performance of irrigation demand based on the integration of remote sensing techniques and simulation modeling of irrigation water in Cyprus. For this purpose two different models were examined for specific annual crops (chickpeas) cultivated in the agricultural area of Mandria (SW Cyprus). The first one is a dynamic water budget model that supports multi-criteria optimization of water allocation and use. Estimating evapotranspiration involves irrigation demand estimation models which are based on predicted or observed meteorological data, crops and cropping patterns and individual crop physiological water demand. The second model is a fully based satellite image technique (SEBAL). SEBAL is a direct method to estimate evapotranspiration without a priori knowledge on soil, crop, and management conditions. Although evapotranspiration is very difficult to be calculated since it is not a straightforward procedure the comparison of the two different methods indicates similar results between them. The results had no any statistical significance difference using the T-test.


Agricultural Area Water Allocation Water Vapour Transport Energy Balance Model Irrigation Demand 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



Thanks are given to the Remote Sensing Laboratory of the Department of Civil Engineering & Geomatics at the Cyprus University of Technology for the support ( and the Meteorological Service of Cyprus for providing climate data. This study is part of G. Papadavid Ph.D. Thesis which is both supported by ‘Cyprus Research Promotion Foundation fund (PENEK/ENISX/0308/13’) and the Cyprus University Research Committee fund (‘Integration’/Internal project).


  1. Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration, guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage, vol 56. Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN (FAO), Rome, p 300Google Scholar
  2. Bastiaanssen WGM (2000) SEBAL-based sensible and latent heat fluxes in the irrigated Gediz Basin, Turkey. J Hydrol 229:87–100. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1694(99)00202-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bastiaanssen WGM, Menenti M, Feddes RA, Holtslag AAM (1998) A remote sensing surface energy balance algorithm for land (SEBAL). Part 1: Formulation. J Hydrol 212–213:198–212. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00253-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Doorenbos J, Pruitt WO (1977) Crop water requirements. FAO irrigation and drainage 24. FAO, Rome, 144pp (revised)Google Scholar
  5. FAO (1998) Crop evapotranspiration – guidelines for computing crop water requirements. Food and Agricultural Organization Irrigation and Drainage 56. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  6. Fedra K, Kubat M, Zuvela-Aloise M (2007) Web-based water resources management: economic valuation and participatory multi-criteria optimization. In: Proceedings of the second IASTED international conference water resources management, 20–22 Aug 2007, Honolulu, HIGoogle Scholar
  7. Hadjimitsis DG, Papadavid G, Themistocleous K, Kounoudes A, Toulios L (2008) Estimating irrigation demand using satellite remote sensing: a case study of Paphos District area in Cyprus. In: Neale CMU, Owe M, D’Urso G (eds) Remote sensing for agriculture, ecosystems, and hydrology. Proceedings of SPIE Europe remote sensing, vol 7104. University of Wales Institute, Cardiff, p 71040I. doi:10.1117/12.800366 Google Scholar
  8. Harmancioglu N, Fedra K, Barbaros F (2008) Analysis of sustainability in management of water scarce basins: the case of the Gediz River Basin in Turkey. Desalination 226:175–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hoedjes JCB, Chehbouni A, Jacob F, Ezzahar J, Boulet G (2008) Deriving daily evapotranspiration from remotely sensed instantaneous evaporative fraction over olive orchard in semi-arid Morocco. J Hydrol 354:53–64. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.02.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Papadavid G, Agapiou A, Michaelides S, Hadjimitsis DG (2009) The integration of meteorology and remote sensing for monitoring irrigation demand in Cyprus. Nat Hazard Earth Sys 9(6):2009–2014. doi: 10.5194/nhess-9-2009-200 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Papadavid G, Hadjimitsis DG, Perdikou S, Michaelides S, Toulios L, Sereaphides N (2011) Use of field spectroscopy for exploring the impact of atmospheric effects on Landsat 5 TM/7 ETM + satellite images intended for hydrological purposes in Cyprus. GIScience Remote Sens 48(2):280–298. doi: 10.2747/1548-1603.48.2.280 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Papadavid
    • 1
  • D. G. Hadjimitsis
    • 2
  • S. Michaelides
    • 3
  • L. Toulios
    • 4
  • A. Agapiou
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.The Agricultural Research Institute (ARI)NicosiaCyprus
  2. 2.Department of Civil Engineer and GeomaticsCyprus University of TechnologyLimassolCyprus
  3. 3.Cyprus Meteorological ServiceNicosiaCyprus
  4. 4.National Agricultural Research Foundation (NAGREF)LarissaGreece

Personalised recommendations