Investigating with the Ceres-Wheat Model the Impacts of Soil and Climate Factors on Durum Wheat Performance and Earliness in Northern Greece

  • K. SymeonidisEmail author
  • T. Mavromatis
  • S. Kotzamanidis
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Atmospheric Sciences book series (SPRINGERATMO)


Understanding crop-climate relationships are an important step to the development of reliable management systems that could allow yield prediction and quality improvement. In the present study, the impacts of soil and climatic factors on phenological development and productivity of three varieties of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum, L. var. durum) have been examined. For this purpose, phenological observations and the final harvest from experiments conducted in the farm of the Cereal Institute in Thermi, Thessaloniki, during 2003–2010 were taken. Furthermore, the extent to which the CERES-Wheat model may predict the observed relations between soil-climatic factors and durum wheat has also been investigated. The root mean squared error (RMSE) for end ear growth ranged between 1.13 d and 1.88 d and from 0.52 to 1.27 d for model calibration and validation, respectively. The RMSE of final grain yield was, on average, 0.21 t ha−1 for model calibration and validation. This study showed that CERES-Wheat has the capacity for simulating satisfactorily the impacts of soil and climate factors on durum wheat performance and earliness in Northern Greece.


Root Mean Square Error Wheat Cultivar Durum Wheat Mean Absolute Percentage Error Phenology Stage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Hunt LA, White JW, Hoogenboom G (2001) Agronomic data: advances in documentation and protocols for exchange and use. Agr Syst 70:477–492. doi: 10.1016/S0308-521X(01)00056-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Jones CA, Kiniry JR (1986) Ceres-N Maize: a simulation model of maize growth and development. Texas A&M University Press, College StationGoogle Scholar
  3. Jones JW, Hoogenboom G, Porter C, Boote K, Batchelor W, Hunt LA, Singh U, Gijsman A, Ritchie J (2003) The DSSAT cropping system model. Eur J Agron 18:235–265. doi: 10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00107-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. NSSG, National Statistical Service of Greece (2007)Google Scholar
  5. Soltani A, Meinke H, deVoil P (2004) Assessing linear interpolation to generate daily radiation and temperature data for use in crop simulations. Eur J Agron 21:133–148. doi: 10.1016/S1161-0301(03)00044-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Suleiman AA, Ritchie JT (2001) Estimating saturated hydraulic conductivity from soil porosity. Trans ASAE 44(2):235–239Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Meteorology and Climatology-School of GeologyAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations