The Mystery of Economy Structural Imbalance between China and America: A New Interpretation of Marshall-Lerner Condition

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing book series (AINSC, volume 158)

Abstract

The economic imbalances between China and America stem from the internal imbalances caused by the inappropriate macroeconomic policies of America over the past years. U.S. loose monetary policy accelerates international capital to flow to emerging market and lead to the formation of a global excess liquidity. But net capital inflows together with trade surplus makes their macroeconomic policies in emerging market countries more complicated. Long-term low interest rates lead to American increasing consumption expenditure and rising double deficit. In order to transfer the conflict, U.S. forces revaluation of RMB frequently. The continued substantial appreciation of RMB challenges the traditional Marshall-Lerner condition. Through formatting an equilibrium model, this paper deeply studies the export elasticity and import elasticity to examine the Marshall-Lerner condition and analysis its adaption and sensitivity, showing that in short term revaluation of RMB can improve U.S. trade deficit, but in long term it is ineffective.

Keywords

component RMB exchange rate Marshall-Lerner condition Balance of payments Double deficits 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Li, Y.: Research about the Foreign Economic of China and the balance of international Payment. International Culture Press, Beijing (1991)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen, B.: Research about the Exchange Rate of RMB. East China Normal University Press, Shanghai (1992)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dai, Z.: The elasticity analysis of China’s trade balance. Economic Research (7), 55–62 (1997)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhu, Z., Ning, N.: The elasticity analysis of China’s trade balance. World Economic (11), 26–31 (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Johansen, S.: Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in Gaussian vector auto regressive models. Econometrica 59, 1551–1580 (1991)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hoper, P.: Trade elasticitiesfor the G27 countries. Princeton Studiesin International Economics, vol. (87). Princeton University (2000)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goldstein, M., Khan, M.S.: Income and price effectsinforeign trade. In: Handbook of International Economics, pp. 1041–1105. North Holland, Amsterdam (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Caves, R.E., Frankel, J.A., Jones, R.W.: World trade and payments: an introduction, 9th edn. Addison Wesley (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lerner, A.: The economics of control. Macmillan, New York (1944)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sinha, D.: A note on trade elasticities in asian countries. International Trade Journal 15, 221–237 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EconomicsTianjin Polytechnic UniversityTianjinChina

Personalised recommendations